Strategies for Context-Adaptive Message Dissemination in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks

In future deployments of vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) safety-related applications such as local danger warning (LDW) will use broadcast-based communication schemes to transmit information to other vehicles within the network. The unlimited flooding of a message throughout the whole network however, is neither feasible nor intended. The high resulting traffic load would congest the shared wireless medium and prevent other, potentially highly relevant and time-critical messages from getting access to the medium. Existing strategies to limit redundant packet retransmissions manage to make broadcast-based data packet dissemination more efficient and reliable. However, they do not take into account the individual network's nodes interest in information. In fact, the static mechanisms proposed are not adequate to leverage the limited network resources as efficiently as possible in varying network conditions and to transport information to where it is needed as fast as possible. Therefore, we propose an altruistic communication scheme which differentiates data traffic according to the benefit it is likely to provide to potential recipients. A system for calculating and leveraging message benefit and two different node architectures are presented. With the help of a comprehensive simulation environment, the performance of our concept is analyzed. Comparative simulative studies show that an improvement of the benefit provided to all the participants in a VANET is also possible with the help of the readily available IEEE 802.11e standard, but to a lower extent.

[1]  T. Kosch Situationsadaptive Kommunikation in Automobilen Ad-hoc Netzen , 2005 .

[2]  Edward W. Knightly,et al.  Ordered packet scheduling in wireless ad hoc networks: mechanisms and performance analysis , 2002, MobiHoc '02.

[3]  Richard J. La,et al.  Utility-based rate control in the Internet for elastic traffic , 2002, TNET.

[4]  Tracy Camp,et al.  Comparison of broadcasting techniques for mobile ad hoc networks , 2002, MobiHoc '02.

[5]  N. K. Shankaranarayanan,et al.  A subjective survey of user experience for data applications for future cellular wireless networks , 2001, Proceedings 2001 Symposium on Applications and the Internet.

[6]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  Broadcast reception rates and effects of priority access in 802.11-based vehicular ad-hoc networks , 2004, VANET '04.

[7]  M. Fazel,et al.  Network Utility Maximization With Nonconcave Utilities Using Sum-of-Squares Method , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Path loss, delay spread, and outage models as functions of antenna height for microcellular system design , 1994 .

[9]  Christoph Schroth,et al.  Simulation of car-to-car messaging: analyzing the impact on road traffic , 2005, 13th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems.

[10]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Charging and rate control for elastic traffic , 1997, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[11]  Nj Piscataway,et al.  Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications , 1996 .

[12]  Jörg Widmer,et al.  Contention-based forwarding for mobile ad hoc networks , 2003, Ad Hoc Networks.

[13]  Stefan Krauss,et al.  MICROSCOPIC MODELING OF TRAFFIC FLOW: INVESTIGATION OF COLLISION FREE VEHICLE DYNAMICS. , 1998 .

[14]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[15]  Paul James,et al.  A Practical View on Quality-of-Service Support in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2003 .

[16]  Mung Chiang,et al.  Nonconcave network utility maximization through sum of squares method , 2005, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.