Audio-/Videorecording Clinic Visits for Patient’s Personal Use in the United States: Cross-Sectional Survey

Background Few clinics in the United States routinely offer patients audio or video recordings of their clinic visits. While interest in this practice has increased, to date, there are no data on the prevalence of recording clinic visits in the United States. Objective Our objectives were to (1) determine the prevalence of audiorecording clinic visits for patients’ personal use in the United States, (2) assess the attitudes of clinicians and public toward recording, and (3) identify whether policies exist to guide recording practices in 49 of the largest health systems in the United States. Methods We administered 2 parallel cross-sectional surveys in July 2017 to the internet panels of US-based clinicians (SERMO Panel) and the US public (Qualtrics Panel). To ensure a diverse range of perspectives, we set quotas to capture clinicians from 8 specialties. Quotas were also applied to the public survey based on US census data (gender, race, ethnicity, and language other than English spoken at home) to approximate the US adult population. We contacted 49 of the largest health systems (by clinician number) in the United States by email and telephone to determine the existence, or absence, of policies to guide audiorecordings of clinic visits for patients’ personal use. Multiple logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with recording. Results In total, 456 clinicians and 524 public respondents completed the surveys. More than one-quarter of clinicians (129/456, 28.3%) reported that they had recorded a clinic visit for patients’ personal use, while 18.7% (98/524) of the public reported doing so, including 2.7% (14/524) who recorded visits without the clinician’s permission. Amongst clinicians who had not recorded a clinic visit, 49.5% (162/327) would be willing to do so in the future, while 66.0% (346/524) of the public would be willing to record in the future. Clinician specialty was associated with prior recording: specifically oncology (odds ratio [OR] 5.1, 95% CI 1.9-14.9; P=.002) and physical rehabilitation (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4-11.6; P=.01). Public respondents who were male (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.26-3.61; P=.005), younger (OR 0.73 for a 10-year increase in age, 95% CI 0.60-0.89; P=.002), or spoke a language other than English at home (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.09-3.59; P=.02) were more likely to have recorded a clinic visit. None of the large health systems we contacted reported a dedicated policy; however, 2 of the 49 health systems did report an existing policy that would cover the recording of clinic visits for patient use. The perceived benefits of recording included improved patient understanding and recall. Privacy and medicolegal concerns were raised. Conclusions Policy guidance from health systems and further examination of the impact of recordings—positive or negative—on care delivery, clinician-related outcomes, and patients’ behavioral and health-related outcomes is urgently required.

[1]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Giving tape recordings or written summaries of consultations to people with cancer: a systematic review , 2001, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[2]  J. Sensmeier Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence. , 2017, Nursing management.

[3]  E. Yano,et al.  Challenges Facing Primary Care Practices Aiming to Implement Patient-Centered Medical Homes , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  J. Travis Gossey,et al.  Association of Patient Recall, Satisfaction, and Adherence to Content of an Electronic Health Record (EHR)–Generated After Visit Summary: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2014, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[5]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Can Patients Make Recordings of Medical Encounters?: What Does the Law Say? , 2017, JAMA.

[6]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Providing recording of clinical consultation to patients - a highly valued but underutilized intervention: a scoping review. , 2014, Patient education and counseling.

[7]  L. Morales,et al.  Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  S. Boyko,et al.  Effective Teaching Strategies and Methods of Delivery for Patient Education: A Systematic Review and Practice Guideline Recommendations , 2011, Journal of Cancer Education.

[9]  Elizabeth A Bayliss,et al.  Barriers to Self-Management and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Seniors With Multimorbidities , 2007, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[10]  A. E. Thompson,et al.  The influence of gender and other patient characteristics on health care-seeking behaviour: a QUALICOPC study , 2016, BMC Family Practice.

[11]  D. Berwick Disseminating innovations in health care. , 2003, JAMA.

[12]  Tom Delbanco,et al.  Sharing Physician Notes Through an Electronic Portal is Associated With Improved Medication Adherence: Quasi-Experimental Study , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  Paul C. Tang,et al.  Care-Centered Clinical Documentation in the Digital Environment: Solutions to Alleviate Burnout , 2018 .

[14]  J. Hibbard,et al.  What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. , 2013, Health affairs.

[15]  E. Perez-stable,et al.  Language Barriers and Understanding of Hospital Discharge Instructions , 2012, Medical care.

[16]  Jerod M Loeb,et al.  Language proficiency and adverse events in US hospitals: a pilot study. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[17]  S. Kripalani Clinical summaries for hospitalised patients: time for higher standards , 2016, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[18]  Joseph L. Kannry,et al.  Patient and clinician perspectives on the outpatient after-visit summary: a qualitative study to inform improvements in visit summary design , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Patients recording clinical encounters: a path to empowerment? Assessment by mixed methods , 2015, BMJ Open.

[20]  R. Kessels,et al.  Patients’ Memory for Medical Information , 2003, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[21]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Awareness and Use of the After-Visit Summary Through a Patient Portal: Evaluation of Patient Characteristics and an Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2016, Journal of medical Internet research.

[22]  B. McKinstry,et al.  A systematic review of interventions to improve recall of medical advice in healthcare consultations , 2009, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[23]  S. van Dulmen,et al.  Does age really matter? Recall of information presented to newly referred patients with cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Sharing Annotated Audio Recordings of Clinic Visits With Patients—Development of the Open Recording Automated Logging System (ORALS): Study Protocol , 2017, JMIR research protocols.

[25]  Joann G Elmore,et al.  Inviting Patients to Read Their Doctors' Notes: A Quasi-experimental Study and a Look Ahead , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[26]  Charles E McCulloch,et al.  Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[27]  T. Hack,et al.  Audio-taping the oncology treatment consultation: a literature review. , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[28]  D. Meltzer,et al.  Influence of language barriers on outcomes of hospital care for general medicine inpatients. , 2010, Journal of hospital medicine.

[29]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Patients Covertly Recording Clinical Encounters: Threat or Opportunity? A Qualitative Analysis of Online Texts , 2015, PloS one.

[30]  David F. Rosenthal,et al.  Voice-Enabled, Structured Medical Reporting , 1998, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[31]  P Ley,et al.  Memory for medical information. , 1979, The British journal of social and clinical psychology.