Heel contact as a function of substrate type and speed in primates.

In this report we provide detailed data on the patterns and frequency of heel contact with terrestrial and arboreal supports in primates. These data can help resolve the question of whether African apes and humans are uniquely "plantigrade" (Gebo [1992] Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 89:29-58; Gebo [1993a] Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 91:382-385; Gebo [1993b] Postcranial Adaptation in Nonhuman Primates), or if plantigrady is common in other primates (Meldrum [1993] Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 91:379-381). Using biplanar and uniplanar videotapes, we recorded the frequency and timing of heel contact for a variety of primates (32 species) walking on the ground and on simulated arboreal supports at a range of natural speeds. Our results indicate that Pongo as well as the African apes exhibit a "heel-strike" at the end of swing phase. Ateles and Hylobates make heel contact on all supports shortly after mid-foot contact, although spider monkeys do so only at slow or moderate speeds. Data available from uniplanar videotapes suggest that this pattern occurs in Alouatta and Lagothrix as well. No other New or Old World monkey or prosimian in this study made heel contact during quadrupedalism on any substrate. Thus, heel contact occurs in all apes and atelines, but only the great apes exhibit a heel-strike. We suggest that heel contact with the substrate is a by-product of an active posterior weight-shift mechanism involving highly protracted hindlimbs at touchdown. Force plate studies indicate that this mechanism is most extreme in arboreally adapted primate quadrupeds walking on arboreal supports. Although heel contact and heel-strike may have no evolutionary link, it is possible that both patterns are the result of a similar weight shift mechanism. Therefore, the regular occurrence of heel contact in a variety of arboreal primates, and the absence of a true biomechanical link between limb elongation, heel contact, and terrestriality, calls into question the claim that hominid foot posture was necessarily derived from a quadrupedal terrestrial ancestor.

[1]  H. Mchenry The Common Ancestor , 1984 .

[2]  T R Reynolds,et al.  Stride length and its determinants in humans, early hominids, primates, and mammals. , 1987, American journal of physical anthropology.

[3]  W. Jungers Lucy's limbs: skeletal allometry and locomotion in Australopithecus afarensis , 1982, Nature.

[4]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Ground reaction forces in distance running. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  D. Gebo Plantigrady and foot adaptation in African apes: implications for hominid origins. , 1992, American journal of physical anthropology.

[6]  T. Reynolds,et al.  Stresses on the limbs of quadrupedal primates. , 1985, American journal of physical anthropology.

[7]  H. Elftman,et al.  Chimpanzee and human feet in bipedal walking , 1935 .

[8]  R. L. Susman,et al.  Evolution of the Human Foot: Evidence from Plio-Pleistocene Hominids , 1983, Foot & ankle.

[9]  E. Simons,et al.  The humerus of Aegyptopithecus zeuxis: a primitive anthropoid. , 1982, American journal of physical anthropology.

[10]  B. Demes,et al.  The kinetics of primate quadrupedalism: "hindlimb drive" reconsidered , 1994 .

[11]  D. D. Arnheim,et al.  Modern principles of athletic training , 1989 .

[12]  T I Grand,et al.  The functional anatomy of the lower limb of the howler monkey (Alouatta caraya). , 1968, American journal of physical anthropology.

[13]  T. Reynolds Mechanics of increased support of weight by the hindlimbs in primates. , 1985, American journal of physical anthropology.

[14]  M. Hildebrand Symmetrical gaits of primates , 1967 .

[15]  M. Ybarra,et al.  Positional behavior and limb bone adaptations in red howling monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) , 1987 .

[16]  D. Gebo Reply to Dr. Meldrum , 1993 .

[17]  E. Hooton,et al.  Up from the Ape , 1947 .

[18]  J. T. Stern,et al.  Arboreality and bipedality in the Hadar hominids. , 1984, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[19]  D. Youlatos Passages within a discontinuous canopy: bridging in the red howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus). , 1993, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[20]  D. Gebo,et al.  Functional anatomy of the tarsier foot , 1987 .

[21]  M. Rodgers Dynamic biomechanics of the normal foot and ankle during walking and running. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[22]  T. Harrison New postcranial remains of Victoriapithecus from the middle Miocene of Kenya , 1989 .

[23]  D. McClearn,et al.  Locomotion, Posture, and Feeding Behavior of Kinkajous, Coatis, and Raccoons , 1992 .

[24]  J. T. Stern,et al.  The locomotor anatomy of Australopithecus afarensis. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.

[25]  F. Mendel,et al.  Postural and locomotor behavior of Alouatta palliata on various substrates. , 1976, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[26]  D. Meldrum On plantigrady and quadrupedalism. , 1993, American journal of physical anthropology.

[27]  H. Mchenry,et al.  The capitate of Australopithecus afarensis and A. africanus. , 1983, American journal of physical anthropology.

[28]  D. Schmitt Forelimb mechanics as a function of substrate type during quadrupedalism in two anthropoid primates , 1994 .

[29]  A. Keith The history of the human foot and its bearing on orthopaedic practice , 1929 .

[30]  Margaret Rose The process of bipedalization in hominids , 1991 .

[31]  D. J. Morton Human origin. Correlation of previous studies of primate feet and posture with other morphologic evidence , 1927 .

[32]  T. Kimura Bipedal and quadrupedal walking of primates : Comparative dynamics , 1985 .

[33]  J. Bronowski The Ascent of Man , 1973 .

[34]  D. Meldrum,et al.  Kinematics of the cercopithecine foot on arboreal and terrestrial substrates with implications for the interpretation of hominid terrestrial adaptations. , 1991, American journal of physical anthropology.

[35]  F. Weidenreich Evolution of the human foot , 1923 .

[36]  D. J. Morton,et al.  Evolution of the human foot II , 1924 .