Impact factor for the ionospheric total electron content response to solar flare irradiation

On the basis of ionospheric total electron content (TEC) enhancement over the subsolar region during flares, and combined with data of the peak X-ray flux in the 0.1-0.8 nm region, EUV increase in the 0.1-50 and 26-34 nm regions observed by the SOHO Solar EUV Monitor EUV detector, also with the flare location on the solar disc, the relationship among these parameters is analyzed statistically. Results show that the correlation between ionospheric TEC enhancement and the soft X-ray peak flux in the 0.1-0.8 nm region is poor, and the flare location on the solar disc is one noticeable factor for the impact strength of the ionospheric TEC during solar flares. Statistics indicate clearly that, at the same X-ray class, the flares near the solar disc center have much larger effects on the ionospheric TEC than those near the solar limb region. For the EUV band, although TEC enhancements and EUV flux increases in both the 0.1-50 and 26-34 nm regions have a positive relation, the flux increase in the 26-34 nm region during flares is more correlative with TEC enhancements. Considering the possible connection between the flare location on the solar disc and the solar atmospheric absorption to the EUV irradiation, an Earth zenith angle is introduced, and an empirical formula describing the relationship of TEC enhancement and traditional flare parameters, including flare X-ray peak and flare location information, is given. In addition, the X-ray class of the flare occurring on 4 November 2003, which led the saturation of the X-ray detector on GOES 12, is estimated using this empirical formula, and the estimated class is X44.

[1]  J. Klobuchar,et al.  CORRELATION OF SOLAR RADIO BURSTS AND SUDDEN INCREASES OF THE TOTAL ELECTRON CONTENT (SITEC) OF THE IONOSPHERE. , 1972 .

[2]  Gabor E. Lanyi,et al.  A comparison of mapped and measured total ionospheric electron content using global positioning system and beacon satellite observations , 1988 .

[3]  C. Rodger,et al.  Large solar flares and their ionospheric D region enhancements , 2005 .

[4]  R. F. Donnelly Contribution of X‐ray and EUV bursts of solar flares to sudden frequency deviations , 1969 .

[5]  D. J. Allerton,et al.  Book Review: GPS theory and practice. Second Edition, HOFFMANNWELLENHOFF B., LICHTENEGGER H. and COLLINS J., 1993, 326 pp., Springer, £31.00 pb, ISBN 3-211-82477-4 , 1995 .

[6]  Chi‐Yen Lin,et al.  The solar flare radiation responsible for sudden frequency deviation and geomagnetic fluctuation , 1996 .

[7]  L. A. Leonovich,et al.  The response of the ionosphere to faint and bright solar flares as deduced from global GPS network data , 2002 .

[8]  C. Rodger,et al.  Ionosphere gives size of greatest solar flare , 2004 .

[9]  Gary J. Rottman,et al.  Solar EUV Experiment (SEE): Mission overview and first results , 2005 .

[10]  Anthony J. Mannucci,et al.  A global mapping technique for GPS‐derived ionospheric total electron content measurements , 1998 .

[11]  K. Igarashi,et al.  GPS‐derived ionospheric total electron content response to a solar flare that occurred on 14 July 2000 , 2002 .

[12]  Steven Tingay,et al.  X‐ray magnitude of the 4 November 2003 solar flare inferred from the ionospheric attenuation of the galactic radio background , 2005 .

[13]  A. Mitra,et al.  Ionospheric effects of solar flares , 1974 .

[14]  Greg Kopp,et al.  Contributions of the solar ultraviolet irradiance to the total solar irradiance during large flares , 2005 .

[15]  R. Skoug,et al.  Introduction to the special section: Violent Sun‐Earth connection events of October–November 2003 , 2005 .

[16]  A. Mannucci,et al.  A brief review of “solar flare effects” on the ionosphere , 2009 .

[17]  Greg Kopp,et al.  Solar irradiance variability during the October 2003 solar storm period , 2004 .

[18]  L. A. Leonovich,et al.  Dependence of the ionospheric response on the solar flare parameters based on the theoretical modeling and GPS data , 2010 .

[19]  R. F. Donnelly Empirical models of solar flare X ray and EUV emission for use in studying their E and F region effects , 1976 .

[20]  Z. Xiao,et al.  Study of ionospheric response to the 4B flare on 28 October 2003 using International GPS Service network data , 2005 .

[21]  S. Chapman,et al.  The absorption and dissociative or ionizing effect of monochromatic radiation in an atmosphere on a rotating earth , 1931 .

[22]  T. Woods,et al.  The Extreme-Ultraviolet Solar Irradiance Spectrum Observed with the Coronal Diagnostic Spectrometer (CDS) on SOHO , 2000 .

[23]  R. M. Skoug,et al.  Introduction to violent Sun-Earth connection events of October-0 November 2003 5 0 , 2022 .

[24]  Bin Chen,et al.  Modeling the responses of the middle latitude ionosphere to solar flares , 2007 .

[25]  Zuo Xiao,et al.  Study of the ionospheric total electron content response to the great flare on 15 April 2001 using the International GPS Service network for the whole sunlit hemisphere , 2003 .

[26]  L. R. Canfield,et al.  First Solar EUV Irradiances Obtained from SOHO by the Celias/Sem , 1998 .

[27]  L. Kersley,et al.  Behavior of the ionospheric F region during the Great Solar Flare of August 7, 1972 , 1974 .

[28]  Simon P. Plunkett,et al.  Introduction to violent Sun‐Earth connection events of October–November 2003 , 2005 .

[29]  A. Mannucci,et al.  Extreme solar EUV flares and ICMEs and resultant extreme ionospheric effects: Comparison of the Halloween 2003 and the Bastille Day events , 2006 .

[30]  A. Mannucci,et al.  The October 28, 2003 extreme EUV solar flare and resultant extreme ionospheric effects: Comparison to other Halloween events and the Bastille Day event , 2005 .