The biphasic poroviscoelastic behavior of articular cartilage: role of the surface zone in governing the compressive behavior.

Surface fibrillation of articular cartilage is an early sign of degenerative changes in the development of osteoarthritis. To assess the influence of the surface zone on the viscoelastic properties of cartilage under compressive loading, we prepared osteochondral plugs from skeletally mature steers, with and without the surface zone of articular cartilage, for study in the confined compression creep experiment. The relative contributions of two viscoelastic mechanisms, i.e. a flow-independent mechanism [Hayes and Bodine, J. Biomechanics 11, 407-419 (1978)], and a flow-dependent mechanism [Mow et al. J. biomech. Engng 102, 73-84 (1980)], to the compressive creep response of these two types of specimens were determined using the biphasic poroviscoelastic theory proposed by Mak. [J. Biomechanics 20, 703-714 (1986)]. From the experimental results and the biphasic poroviscoelastic theory, we found that frictional drag associated with interstitial fluid flow and fluid pressurization are the dominant mechanisms of load support in the intact specimens, i.e. the flow-dependent mechanisms alone were sufficient to describe normal articular cartilage compressive creep behavior. For specimens with the surface removed, we found an increased creep rate which was derived from an increased tissue permeability, as well as significant changes in the flow-independent parameters of the viscoelastic solid matrix. permeability, as well as significant changes in the flow-independent parameters of the viscoelastic solid matrix. From these tissue properties and the biphasic poroviscoelastic theory, we determined that the flow-dependent mechanisms of load support, i.e. frictional drag and fluid pressurization, were greatly diminished in cartilage without the articular surface. Calculations based upon these material parameters show that for specimens with the surface zone removed, the cartilage solid matrix became more highly loaded during the early stages of creep. This suggests that an important function of the articular surface is to provide for a low fluid permeability, and thereby serve to restrict fluid exudation and increase interstitial fluid pressurization. Thus, it is likely that with increasing severity of damage to the articular surface, load support in cartilage under compression shifts from the flow-dependent modes of fluid drag and pressurization to increased solid matrix stress. This suggests that it is important to maintain the integrity of the articular surface in preserving normal compressive behavior of the tissue and normal load carriage in the joint.

[1]  V C Mow,et al.  Tensile properties of human knee joint cartilage: I. Influence of ionic conditions, weight bearing, and fibrillation on the tensile modulus , 1986, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  J M Mansour,et al.  The permeability of articular cartilage under compressive strain and at high pressures. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  A F Mak,et al.  Nonlinear viscoelastic properties of articular cartilage in shear , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  W C Hayes,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of human articular cartilage. , 1971, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  V C Mow,et al.  Effects of proteoglycan extraction on the tensile behavior of articular cartilage , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  M. Glimcher,et al.  Changes in the hexosamine content and swelling ratio of articular cartilage as functions of depth from the surface. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  P. Bullough,et al.  The distribution of collagen in human articular cartilage with some of its physiological implications. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  M. Holmes,et al.  Singular perturbation analysis of the nonlinear, flow-dependent compressive stress relaxation behavior of articular cartilage. , 1985, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  A. Mak,et al.  The effect of shear fatigue on bovine articular cartilage , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  W M Lai,et al.  Drag-induced compression of articular cartilage during a permeation experiment. , 1980, Biorheology.

[11]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Chemical composition and swelling of normal and osteoarthrotic femoral head cartilage. I. Chemical composition. , 1977, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  J Black,et al.  The viscoelastic shear behavior of normal rabbit articular cartilage. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  V C Mow,et al.  Variations in the intrinsic mechanical properties of human articular cartilage with age, degeneration, and water content. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  A F Mak,et al.  The apparent viscoelastic behavior of articular cartilage--the contributions from the intrinsic matrix viscoelasticity and interstitial fluid flows. , 1986, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  V. Mow,et al.  Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage--I. Theoretical analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  W C Hayes,et al.  Flow-independent viscoelastic properties of articular cartilage matrix. , 1978, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  W M Lai,et al.  Fluid transport and mechanical properties of articular cartilage: a review. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  L. Mockros,et al.  Indentation tests of human articular cartilage. , 1976, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  M. Freeman,et al.  The determination of a creep modulus for articular cartilage from indentation tests of the human femoral head. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  W M Lai,et al.  Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage--II. A numerical algorithm and an experimental study. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  S L Woo,et al.  A comparison of the physical behavior of normal articular cartilage and the arthroplasty surface. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  W M Lai,et al.  An analysis of the unconfined compression of articular cartilage. , 1984, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Physicochemical properties of cartilage in the light of ion exchange theory. , 1968, Biophysical journal.

[24]  V. Mow,et al.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[25]  I. Redler A scanning electron microscopic study of human normal and osteoarthritic articular cartilage. , 1974, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  S L Woo,et al.  Quasi-linear viscoelastic properties of normal articular cartilage. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[27]  A. Grodzinsky,et al.  Swelling of articular cartilage and other connective tissues: Electromechanochemical forces , 1985, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[28]  M. Holmes,et al.  Advanced theoretical and experimental techniques in cartilage research , 1982 .

[29]  G E Kempson,et al.  The effects of proteolytic enzymes on the mechanical properties of adult human articular cartilage. , 1976, Biochimica et biophysica acta.