Dose accumulation for MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy: From practical considerations to state-of-the-art clinical implementation

MRI-linear accelerator (MR-linac) devices have been introduced into clinical practice in recent years and have enabled MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART). However, by accounting for anatomical changes throughout radiation therapy (RT) and delivering different treatment plans at each fraction, adaptive radiation therapy (ART) highlights several challenges in terms of calculating the total delivered dose. Dose accumulation strategies—which typically involve deformable image registration between planning images, deformable dose mapping, and voxel-wise dose summation—can be employed for ART to estimate the delivered dose. In MRgART, plan adaptation on MRI instead of CT necessitates additional considerations in the dose accumulation process because MRI pixel values do not contain the quantitative information used for dose calculation. In this review, we discuss considerations for dose accumulation specific to MRgART and in relation to current MR-linac clinical workflows. We present a general dose accumulation framework for MRgART and discuss relevant quality assurance criteria. Finally, we highlight the clinical importance of dose accumulation in the ART era as well as the possible ways in which dose accumulation can transform clinical practice and improve our ability to deliver personalized RT.

[1]  E. Yorke,et al.  High Dose per Fraction, Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC): An Overview. , 2021, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  A. Bertelsen,et al.  Accuracy of automatic structure propagation for daily magnetic resonance image-guided head and neck radiotherapy , 2021, Acta oncologica.

[3]  Laurence E. Court,et al.  Tissue-specific deformable image registration using a spatial-contextual filter , 2020, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[4]  Pengjiang Qian,et al.  Dixon-based thorax synthetic CT generation using Generative Adversarial Network , 2020 .

[5]  J. Lagendijk,et al.  Prostate intrafraction motion during the preparation and delivery of MR-guided radiotherapy sessions on a 1.5T MR-Linac. , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  J. Lagendijk,et al.  Delivered dose quantification in prostate radiotherapy using online 3D cine imaging and treatment log files on a combined 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging and linear accelerator system , 2020, Physics and imaging in radiation oncology.

[7]  Jinzhong Yang,et al.  Initial Feasibility and Clinical Implementation of Daily MR-guided Adaptive Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy on a 1.5T MR-Linac System: Prospective R-IDEAL 2a/2b Systematic Clinical Evaluation of Technical Innovation , 2020, medRxiv.

[8]  B. Erickson,et al.  Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Simultaneous Integrated Boost Approach. , 2020, Practical radiation oncology.

[9]  A. Bertelsen,et al.  Accuracy of automatic deformable structure propagation for high-field MRI guided prostate radiotherapy , 2020, Radiation Oncology.

[10]  R. Louwe,et al.  Quantifying the dose accumulation uncertainty after deformable image registration in head-and-neck radiotherapy. , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  Automatic reconstruction of the delivered dose of the day using MR-linac treatment log files and online MR imaging , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Cornel Zachiu,et al.  Biomechanical quality assurance criteria for deformable image registration algorithms used in radiotherapy guidance , 2020, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  C. Fuller,et al.  Differences between planned and delivered dose for head and neck cancer, and their consequences for normal tissue complication probability and treatment adaptation. , 2020, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  Chenbin Liu,et al.  Synthetic CT Generation Based on T2 Weighted MRI of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC) Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) , 2019, Front. Oncol..

[15]  David A Jaffray,et al.  The transformation of radiation oncology using real-time magnetic resonance guidance: A review. , 2019, European journal of cancer.

[16]  W. Curran,et al.  Evaluation of a deep learning-based pelvic synthetic CT generation technique for MRI-based prostate proton treatment planning , 2019, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  A. Meigooni,et al.  Evaluation of deformable image registration algorithm for determination of accumulated dose for brachytherapy of cervical cancer patients , 2019, Journal of contemporary brachytherapy.

[18]  S. Senan,et al.  End-to-end empirical validation of dose accumulation in MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer using an anthropomorphic deformable pelvis phantom. , 2019, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  I. Chetty,et al.  Modern Radiation Therapy Planning and Delivery. , 2019, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[20]  M F Fast,et al.  MRI-guided mid-position liver radiotherapy: Validation of image processing and registration steps. , 2019, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  D. Georg,et al.  Image guidance: past and future of radiotherapy , 2019, Der Radiologe.

[22]  Clifton David Fuller,et al.  Head and Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART): Conceptual Considerations for the Informed Clinician. , 2019, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[23]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  Deformable Registration for Dose Accumulation. , 2019, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[24]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Adaptive Radiotherapy for Anatomical Changes. , 2019, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[25]  Mona Kamal,et al.  Prospective quantitative quality assurance and deformation estimation of MRI-CT image registration in simulation of head and neck radiotherapy patients , 2019, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[26]  Sebastian Klüter,et al.  Technical design and concept of a 0.35 T MR-Linac , 2019, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[27]  Rob H.N. Tijssen,et al.  Adaptive radiotherapy: The Elekta Unity MR-linac concept , 2019, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[28]  X. Li,et al.  A Technique to Rapidly Generate Synthetic Computed Tomography for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Online Adaptive Replanning: An Exploratory Study. , 2019, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  Pierre Guyomarc'h,et al.  Landmark Typology in Applied Morphometrics Studies: What's the Point? , 2018, Anatomical record.

[30]  Parag J. Parikh,et al.  Stereotactic MR-Guided Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) for Ultracentral Thorax Malignancies: Results of a Phase 1 Trial , 2018, Advances in radiation oncology.

[31]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Multimodal image registration for liver radioembolization planning and patient assessment , 2018, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[32]  Marco Riboldi,et al.  "Patient-specific validation of deformable image registration in radiation therapy: Overview and caveats". , 2018, Medical physics.

[33]  Anurag K. Singh,et al.  Technical and dosimetric implications of respiratory induced density variations in a heterogeneous lung phantom , 2018, Radiation oncology.

[34]  B. Raaymakers,et al.  Anatomically plausible models and quality assurance criteria for online mono- and multi-modal medical image registration , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  W. Tomé,et al.  Towards abdominal MRI-based treatment planning using population-based Hounsfield units for bulk density assignment , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Rojano Kashani,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Target Delineation and Daily Treatment Modification. , 2018, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[37]  K. Brock,et al.  A simulation study to assess the potential impact of developing normal tissue complication probability models with accumulated dose , 2018, Advances in radiation oncology.

[38]  Martin F Fast,et al.  Real-time energy/mass transfer mapping for online 4D dose reconstruction , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[39]  Carri K Glide-Hurst,et al.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Phase I trial of stereotactic MR-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for the treatment of oligometastatic or unresectable primary malignancies of the abdomen. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[41]  A. Garden,et al.  Prospective in silico study of the feasibility and dosimetric advantages of MRI-guided dose adaptation for human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal cancer patients compared with standard IMRT , 2017, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[42]  Cornel Zachiu,et al.  Non-rigid CT/CBCT to CBCT registration for online external beam radiotherapy guidance , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  A. Sahgal,et al.  Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[44]  A N T J Kotte,et al.  First patients treated with a 1.5 T MRI-Linac: clinical proof of concept of a high-precision, high-field MRI guided radiotherapy treatment , 2017, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[45]  B. Stemkens,et al.  Towards fast online intrafraction replanning for free-breathing stereotactic body radiation therapy with the MR-linac , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[46]  Jason Vickress,et al.  Representing the dosimetric impact of deformable image registration errors , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  Elizabeth Gore,et al.  Technical Note: Is bulk electron density assignment appropriate for MRI‐only based treatment planning for lung cancer?† , 2017, Medical physics.

[48]  K. Brock,et al.  Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 132 , 2017, Medical physics.

[49]  K. T. Block,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT for magnetic resonance-only based radiotherapy planning of lung cancer , 2017, Radiation oncology.

[50]  Xiao Han,et al.  MR‐based synthetic CT generation using a deep convolutional neural network method , 2017, Medical physics.

[51]  Raj Shekhar,et al.  Deformable registration of CT and cone-beam CT with local intensity matching , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[52]  I. Chetty,et al.  Caution Must Be Exercised When Performing Deformable Dose Accumulation for Tumors Undergoing Mass Changes During Fractionated Radiation Therapy. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[53]  C. Fuller,et al.  The MRI-Linear Accelerator Consortium: Evidence-Based Clinical Introduction of an Innovation in Radiation Oncology Connecting Researchers, Methodology, Data Collection, Quality Assurance, and Technical Development , 2016, Front. Oncol..

[54]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  MIND Demons for MR-to-CT deformable image registration in image-guided spine surgery , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[55]  Tianyu Zhao,et al.  Online Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy: First Clinical Applications. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[56]  I. Chetty,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT relative to bulk density assignment-based magnetic resonance-only approaches for prostate radiotherapy , 2015, Radiation oncology.

[57]  Charis Kontaxis,et al.  A new methodology for inter- and intrafraction plan adaptation for the MR-linac , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[58]  Allan Hanbury,et al.  Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool , 2015, BMC Medical Imaging.

[59]  Charis Kontaxis,et al.  Towards adaptive IMRT sequencing for the MR-linac , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[60]  Pascal Haigron,et al.  Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy , 2015, BioMed research international.

[61]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Uncertainties in dose warping due to the choice of deformable registration algorithm. , 2015, Medical physics.

[62]  Samuel G Armato,et al.  Effect of deformable registration on the dose calculated in radiation therapy planning CT scans of lung cancer patients. , 2014, Medical physics.

[63]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  The feasibility of utilizing pseudo CT-data for online MRI based treatment plan adaptation for a stereotactic radiotherapy treatment of spinal bone metastases , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[64]  Sahar Ahmad,et al.  Non rigid image registration by modeling deformations as elastic waves , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[65]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  The ViewRay system: magnetic resonance-guided and controlled radiotherapy. , 2014, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[66]  Ya Wang,et al.  The distance discordance metric---a novel approach to quantifying spatial uncertainties in intra-and inter-patient deformable image registration , 2016 .

[67]  João Manuel R S Tavares,et al.  Medical image registration: a review , 2014, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[68]  Carri Glide-Hurst,et al.  Direct dose mapping versus energy/mass transfer mapping for 4D dose accumulation: fundamental differences and dosimetric consequences , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[69]  Tiina Seppälä,et al.  A dual model HU conversion from MRI intensity values within and outside of bone segment for MRI-based radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer. , 2013, Medical physics.

[70]  Jeffrey N. Adams,et al.  Using patient‐specific phantoms to evaluate deformable image registration algorithms for adaptive radiation therapy , 2013, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[71]  Adam Johansson,et al.  Improved quality of computed tomography substitute derived from magnetic resonance (MR) data by incorporation of spatial information – potential application for MR-only radiotherapy and attenuation correction in positron emission tomography , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[72]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Deformable Medical Image Registration: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[73]  S. Hui,et al.  A framework for deformable image registration validation in radiotherapy clinical applications , 2013, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[74]  Lei Dong,et al.  Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer--dosimetric results from a prospective clinical trial. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[75]  Colin G Orton,et al.  Point/counterpoint: it is not appropriate to "deform" dose along with deformable image registration in adaptive radiotherapy. , 2012, Medical physics.

[76]  Michael Brady,et al.  MIND: Modality independent neighbourhood descriptor for multi-modal deformable registration , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[77]  Eduard Schreibmann,et al.  A measure to evaluate deformable registration fields in clinical settings , 2012, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[78]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy utilizing CT-based technologies: a report of the AAPM TG-179. , 2012, Medical physics.

[79]  Michael Velec,et al.  A novel technique to enable experimental validation of deformable dose accumulation. , 2012, Medical physics.

[80]  Han Liu,et al.  Evaluations of an adaptive planning technique incorporating dose feedback in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer. , 2011, Medical physics.

[81]  Hua Yang,et al.  Deformable image registration of sliding organs using anisotropic diffusive regularization , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[82]  R. Ehman,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography: A review , 2010, Clinical anatomy.

[83]  Tufve Nyholm,et al.  Treatment planning using MRI data: an analysis of the dose calculation accuracy for different treatment regions , 2010, Radiation oncology.

[84]  K. Brock,et al.  Accurate accumulation of dose for improved understanding of radiation effects in normal tissue. , 2010, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[85]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[86]  E. Yorke,et al.  Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[87]  Meritxell Bach Cuadra,et al.  A multidimensional segmentation evaluation for medical image data , 2009, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[88]  Hualiang Zhong,et al.  Monte Carlo dose mapping on deforming anatomy , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[89]  J G M Kok,et al.  Integrating a 1.5 T MRI scanner with a 6 MV accelerator: proof of concept , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[90]  N. Burnet,et al.  SU‐FF‐T‐602: A New Method to Calculate the Dose Distribution From An Isocenter Shift Without Recalculating Dose Distribution to Evaluate Plan with Geometric Uncertainties , 2009 .

[91]  Hualiang Zhong,et al.  An energy transfer method for 4D Monte Carlo dose calculation. , 2008, Medical physics.

[92]  Lei Xing,et al.  Formulating adaptive radiation therapy (ART) treatment planning into a closed-loop control framework , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[93]  E. Haber,et al.  Intensity Gradient Based Registration and Fusion of Multi-modal Images , 2007, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[94]  Eldad Haber,et al.  Intensity Gradient Based Registration and Fusion of Multi-modal Images , 2006, MICCAI.

[95]  M. Kessler.  Image registration and data fusion in radiation therapy. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[96]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  Dose reconstruction in deforming lung anatomy: dose grid size effects and clinical implications. , 2005, Medical physics.

[97]  K. Brock,et al.  Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration. , 2005, Medical physics.

[98]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  A feature space for edgels in images with landmarks , 1993, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[99]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[100]  G S Bauman,et al.  Tracking the dose distribution in radiation therapy by accounting for variable anatomy , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[101]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[102]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  The effect of set-up uncertainties, contour changes, and tissue inhomogeneities on target dose-volume histograms. , 2002, Medical physics.

[103]  A. Nahum,et al.  The delta-TCP concept: a clinically useful measure of tumor control probability. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[104]  R K Ten Haken,et al.  Estimation of tumor control probability model parameters from 3-D dose distributions of non-small cell lung cancer patients. , 1999, Lung cancer.

[105]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[106]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[107]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Spatial Transformation and Registration of Brain Images Using Elastically Deformable Models , 1997, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[108]  Calvin R. Maurer,et al.  Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[109]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[110]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[111]  A. V. Cideciyan,et al.  Registration of ocular fundus images: an algorithm using cross-correlation of triple invariant image descriptors , 1995 .

[112]  Michael Unser,et al.  B-spline signal processing. I. Theory , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[113]  L. R. Dice.  Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[114]  P. Jaccard.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE FLORA IN THE ALPINE ZONE.1 , 1912 .