Body size and joint posture in primates.

Body mass has been shown in experimental and comparative morphological studies to have a significant effect on joint posture in major limb joints. The generalizability of experimental studies is limited by their use of small sample sizes and limited size ranges. In contrast, while comparative morphological studies often have increased sample sizes, the connection between joint posture and morphological variables is often indirect. The current study infers joint postures for a large sample of primates using an experimentally validated method, and tests whether larger primates use more extended joint postures than smaller species. Postures are inferred through the analysis of patterns of subchondral bone apparent density on the medial femoral condyle. Femora from 94 adult wild-shot individuals of 28 species were included. Apparent density measurements were obtained from CT scans using AMIRA software, and the angular position of the anterior-most extent of the region of maximum apparent density on the medial femoral condyle was recorded. In general, the hypothesis that larger-bodied primates use more extended knee posture was supported, but it should be noted that considerable variation exists, particularly at small body sizes. This indicates that smaller species are less constrained by their body size, and their patterns of apparent density are consistent with a wide range of knee postures. The size-related increase in inferred joint posture was observed in most major groups of primates, and this observation attests to the generalizability of Biewener's model that relates body size and joint posture.

[1]  D. Burr,et al.  Body Size and Scaling of Long Bone Geometry, Bone Strength, and Positional Behavior in Cercopithecoid Primates , 1998 .

[2]  J. Polk Influences of limb proportions and body size on locomotor kinematics in terrestrial primates and fossil hominins. , 2004, Journal of human evolution.

[3]  A. Biewener Scaling body support in mammals: limb posture and muscle mechanics. , 1989, Science.

[4]  L. M. Day,et al.  Interspecific scaling of the morphology and posture of the limbs during the locomotion of cats (Felidae) , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[5]  K. Carlson,et al.  Habitual use of the primate forelimb is reflected in the material properties of subchondral bone in the distal radius , 2006, Journal of anatomy.

[6]  I. Paul,et al.  Response of joints to impact loading. 3. Relationship between trabecular microfractures and cartilage degeneration. , 1973, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  W. Jungers Scaling of postcranial joint size in hominoid primates , 1991 .

[8]  H. Mchenry,et al.  Body proportions of Australopithecus afarensis and A. africanus and the origin of the genus Homo. , 1998, Journal of human evolution.

[9]  T. Breurch,et al.  A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation (econometrica vol 47 , 1979 .

[10]  R M Rose,et al.  The response of joints to impact loading. II. In vivo behavior of subchondral bone. , 1972, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  A. Biewener Biomechanical consequences of scaling , 2005, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[12]  S. Cowin,et al.  On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  I. Paul,et al.  Role of mechanical factors in pathogenesis of primary osteoarthritis. , 1972, Lancet.

[14]  J. M. V. Rayner,et al.  Linear relations in biomechanics: the statistics of scaling functions , 2009 .

[15]  Herman Pontzer,et al.  Climbing and the daily energy cost of locomotion in wild chimpanzees: implications for hominoid locomotor evolution. , 2004, Journal of human evolution.

[16]  I L Paul,et al.  Importance of bone in sparing articular cartilage from impact. , 1971, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  D. Burr,et al.  Body size, long bone geometry and locomotion in quadrupedal monkeys , 1994 .

[18]  E. Radin,et al.  Microfractures and microcracks in subchondral bone: are they relevant to osteoarthrosis? , 2003, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[19]  R Putz,et al.  Demonstration of subchondral bone density patterns by three‐dimensional ct osteoabsorptiometry as a noninvasive method for in vivo assessment of individual long‐term stresses in joints , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  K. Carlson,et al.  Apparent density patterns in subchondral bone of the sloth and anteater forelimb , 2008, Biology Letters.

[21]  R. J. Smith,et al.  Body mass in comparative primatology. , 1997, Journal of human evolution.

[22]  Christopher B. Ruff,et al.  Hindlimb articular surface allometry in hominoidea and Macaca, with comparisons to diaphyseal scaling , 1988 .

[23]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  The determinants of change in tibial plateau bone area in osteoarthritic knees: a cohort study , 2005, Arthritis research & therapy.

[24]  L E Lanyon,et al.  Dynamic strain similarity in vertebrates; an alternative to allometric limb bone scaling. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  I L Paul,et al.  A comparison of the dynamic force transmitting properties of subchondral bone and articular cartilage. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  F Eckstein,et al.  Stress distribution in the trochlear notch. A model of bicentric load transmission through joints. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  William L. Jungers,et al.  Long bone cross-sectional dimensions, locomotor adaptations and body size in prosimian primates , 1993 .

[28]  J. Polk,et al.  Knee Posture Predicted from Subchondral Apparent Density in the Distal Femur: An Experimental Validation , 2008, Anatomical record.

[29]  A A Biewener,et al.  Bone strength in small mammals and bipedal birds: do safety factors change with body size? , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  S. K. Chatterji,et al.  Age-related changes in the density and tensile strength of human femoral cortical bone , 1979, Calcified Tissue International.

[31]  Bernd Hamann,et al.  Evolutionary morphing , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[32]  R. E. Heinrich,et al.  A comparison of primate, carnivoran and rodent limb bone cross-sectional properties: are primates really unique? , 2000, Journal of human evolution.

[33]  K J Fischer,et al.  Computational method for determination of bone and joint loads using bone density distributions. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  R. M. Alexander,et al.  Optimization and gaits in the locomotion of vertebrates. , 1989, Physiological reviews.

[35]  C. Ruff,et al.  Structural allometry of the femur and tibia in Hominoidea and Macaca. , 1987, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[36]  A A Biewener,et al.  Musculoskeletal design in relation to body size. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  A. Biewener Biomechanics of mammalian terrestrial locomotion. , 1990, Science.

[38]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[39]  W A Wallace,et al.  Impact-absorbing properties of the human knee. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[40]  A. Biewener Mammalian terrestrial locomotion and size , 1989 .

[41]  G. Hall,et al.  MALIGNANT HYPERTHERMIA: A HUMAN AND PORCINE STRESS SYNDROME? , 1975, The Lancet.

[42]  W. Jungers Relative joint size and hominoid locomotor adaptations with implications for the evolution of hominid bipedalism , 1988 .

[43]  K. Carlson,et al.  Bone density spatial patterns in the distal radius reflect habitual hand postures adopted by quadrupedal primates. , 2007, Journal of human evolution.

[44]  A. Biewener Allometry of quadrupedal locomotion: the scaling of duty factor, bone curvature and limb orientation to body size. , 1983, The Journal of experimental biology.

[45]  W C Hayes,et al.  Fracture mechanics parameters for compact bone--effects of density and specimen thickness. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  L. Lanyon,et al.  Limb mechanics as a function of speed and gait: a study of functional strains in the radius and tibia of horse and dog. , 1982, The Journal of experimental biology.

[47]  W. E. Ricker,et al.  Computation and uses of central trend lines , 1984 .

[48]  W. Jungers,et al.  Shape, relative size, and size‐adjustments in morphometrics , 1995 .

[49]  William R Taylor,et al.  Tibio-femoral joint contact forces in sheep. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[50]  J. Currey The effect of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of elasticity of compact bone. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[51]  Frank P. Leo,et al.  Use of computed tomography in skeletal structure research , 1986 .

[52]  J. Polk,et al.  Adaptive and phylogenetic influences on musculoskeletal design in cercopithecine primates. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.