Simulation in the supply chain context:matching the simulation tool to the problem

The supply chain can be a source of competitive advantage for the firm. Simulation is an effective tool for investigating supply chain problems. The three main simulation approaches in the supply chain context are System Dynamics (SD), Discrete Event Simulation (DES) and Agent Based Modelling (ABM). A sample from the literature suggests that whilst SD and ABM have been used to address strategic and planning problems, DES has mainly been used on planning and operational problems., A review of received wisdom suggests that historically, driven by custom and practice, certain simulation techniques have been focused on certain problem types. A theoretical review of the techniques, however, suggests that the scope of their application should be much wider and that supply chain practitioners could benefit from applying them in this broader way.

[1]  Peter Milling,et al.  Modeling the Forest or Modeling the Trees - A Comparison of System Dynamics and Agent-Based Simulation , 2003 .

[2]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers , 2012 .

[3]  R. G. Coyle Representing Discrete Events in System Dynamics Models: A Theoretical Application to Modelling Coal Production , 1985 .

[4]  M. Christopher Logistics and supply chain management , 2011 .

[5]  Andreas Größler,et al.  Emergent structures in supply chains - a study integrating agent-based and system dynamics modeling , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[6]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[7]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Computer Simulation in Management Science (3rd Edition) , 1998 .

[8]  Charles M. Macal,et al.  Managing Business Complexity: Discovering Strategic Solutions with Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation , 2007 .

[9]  Sergio Cavalieri,et al.  Simulation in the supply chain context: a survey , 2004, Comput. Ind..

[10]  Sally C. Brailsford,et al.  A comparison of discrete event simulation and system dynamics for modelling health care systems , 2001 .

[11]  Hokey Min,et al.  Supply chain modeling: past, present and future , 2002 .

[12]  Nicoleta S. Tipi,et al.  Modelling the dynamics of supply chains , 2000, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[13]  Marios C. Angelides,et al.  System dynamics modelling in supply chain management: research review , 2000, 2000 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37165).

[14]  Andrew Greasley Incorporating human behaviour in a simulation study , 2007 .

[15]  James Odell,et al.  Objects and Agents Compared , 2002, J. Object Technol..

[16]  A. Borshchev,et al.  From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modeling : Reasons , Techniques , Tools , 2004 .

[17]  David C. Lane,et al.  You just don't understand me: modes of failure and success in the discourse between system dynamics and discrete event simulation , 2000 .

[18]  Stewart Robinson,et al.  Comparing discrete-event simulation and system dynamics: users' perceptions , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[19]  Nico Dellaert,et al.  The rediscovery of industrial dynamics: the contribution of system dynamics to supply chain management in a dynamic and fragmented world , 2005 .

[20]  Michael R. Lackner Toward a general simulation capability , 1962, AIEE-IRE '62 (Spring).

[21]  Jack Homer,et al.  Macro- and micro-modeling of field service dynamics , 1999 .

[22]  Tobias Lorenz,et al.  Towards an orientation framework in multi-paradigm modeling Aligning purpose, object and methodology in System Dynamics, Agent-based Modeling and Discrete-Event-Simulation , 2006 .

[23]  Philip J. Kiviat DIGITAL COMPUTER SIMULATION: COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES , 1969 .

[24]  Andrew Greasley,et al.  A comparison of system dynamics and discrete event simulation , 2009 .