Performance Parameters Interrelations from a Balanced Scorecard Perspective: An Analysis of Greek Companies

Purpose - The proponents of balanced scorecard (BSc) claim that lead factors interrelate and their improvement ultimately leads to increased financial performance. The purpose of this paper is to use the underlying hypotheses of BSc in order to assess whether improvements that relate to learning and growth, internal processes and customers actually contribute to alterations of reported financial performance. Design/methodology/approach - A structured questionnaire was used and data were gathered from 90 leading Greek companies in relation to the progress they have experienced during a three-year period regarding various activities that can be broadly classified as aspects of the three qualitative perspectives of BSc (i.e. the learning and growth perspective, the internal business and production process perspective, and the customer perspective). Published financial data were used in order to calculate several financial ratios for all sample firms for the same time period. Findings - The empirical data verified the underlying theoretical hypothesis of BSc that lead BSc perspectives are positively correlated with one an: other at a statistically significant level in a sequential way. However, within a given perspective not all measures exhibit homogeneous behaviour in terms of statistical significance. Supportive evidence was also found that the companies that have improved their return on equity (ROE) and return on assets (ROA) during the analysis period have increased their efforts towards aspects that characterize the learning and growth perspective more than the companies whose ROE and ROA values decreased. Originality/value - The innovative dimension of this research work relies mainly on the fact that the BSc framework was used as a general structured model in order to assess the relationships between non-financial parameters and financial performance. Thus, conclusions are not restricted only to companies that actually apply BSc.

[1]  J. Shepherd,et al.  Book and Resource Reviews , 2005 .

[2]  Gerald K. Debusk,et al.  Components and relative weights in utilization of dashboard measurement systems like the Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .

[3]  R. Kaplan,et al.  PUTTING THE BALANCED SCORECARD TO WORK , 1993 .

[4]  R. Chenhall.  Integrative strategic performance measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufacturing, learning and strategic outcomes: an exploratory study , 2005 .

[5]  D. Larcker,et al.  Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[6]  R. Banker,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Performance Measures Linked to Strategy , 2004 .

[7]  Ulf Johanson,et al.  Current development in human resource costing and accounting: Reality present, researchers absent? , 1998 .

[8]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Exploring Corporate Strategy , 1988 .

[9]  Lan Guo,et al.  Reducing conflict in balanced scorecard evaluations , 2007 .

[10]  Efrosini Kaimenaki,et al.  ABC: adopters, supporters, deniers and unawares , 2005 .

[11]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[12]  Taylor Randall,et al.  Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Services Firms , 2003 .

[13]  I M Pandey,et al.  Balanced Scorecard: Myth and Reality , 2005 .

[14]  Teemu Malmi,et al.  BALANCED SCORECARDS IN FINNISH COMPANIES: A RESEARCH NOTE , 2001 .

[15]  Lars-Goan Aidemark,et al.  The Meaning of Balanced Scorecards in the Health Care Organisation , 2001 .

[16]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[17]  Steven E. Salterio,et al.  A note on the judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard's information organization , 2002 .

[18]  Thomas L. Albright,et al.  An investigation of the effect of Balanced Scorecard implementation on financial performance , 2004 .

[19]  Hanne Nørreklit,et al.  The American balanced scorecard versus the French tableau de bord: the ideological dimension , 2004 .

[20]  Hanne Nørreklit.  The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions , 2000 .

[21]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[22]  Hanne Nørreklit.  The Balanced Scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .

[23]  Zahirul Hoque,et al.  Linking Balanced Scorecard Measures to Size and Market Factors: Impact on Organizational Performance , 2000 .

[24]  Christian Ax,et al.  Bundling and diffusion of management accounting innovations—the case of the balanced scorecard in Sweden , 2005 .

[25]  James R. Evans.  An exploratory study of performance measurement systems and relationships with performance results , 2004 .

[26]  Mary A. Malina,et al.  Communicating and Controlling Strategy: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard , 2001 .

[27]  Fredrik Nilsson,et al.  Performance measurement at Nordic companies , 2000 .

[28]  Robert S. Kaplan,et al.  Advanced Management Accounting , 1989 .

[29]  Steven E. Salterio,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: The Effects of Assurance and Process Accountability on Managerial Judgment , 2004 .

[30]  Paloma Sánchez,et al.  MEASURING INTANGIBLES TO UNDERSTAND AND IMPROVE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT. PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1999 .

[31]  T. Pfeiffer,et al.  A Descriptive Analysis on the Implementation of Balanced Scorecards in German-Speaking Countries , 2003 .