Intermediate product yield enhancement with a catalytic inorganic membrane—I. Analytical model for the case of isothermal and differential operation

A simple model is developed to examine the performance of a supported catalytic membrane within which occurs the consecutive-parallel reaction system given by A + B → R, with RATE = k1pA1ApBB, and A + R → P, with RATE = k2pA2ApRR. Closed-form solutions reveal that segregation of reactants A and B to opposite sides of the membrane is an effective strategy for increasing the desired product (R) point yield. However, increases in the component R yield come at the expense of the point catalyst utilization, due, in part, to depletion of reacting components B and R. The membrane performance is sensitive to the relative reaction orders with respect to component A for the special case in which the rates are zeroth-order with respect to B and R (B = R = 0). The segregation strategy is shown to be most beneficial if three requirements are met: (i) A1 < A2, (ii) k1, k2 sufficiently large and (iii) active layer sufficiently thin compared to support. Under favorable conditions [requirements (i)-(iii) met], component R is selectively produced near the active layer surface, and diffuses out of the membrane before further reaction to undesired product (P). The simulations indicate that the fractional increases in the R yield attained, as the degree of segregation is increased, exceed the fractional decreases in catalyst utilization. A secondary benefit of the membrane design is the confinement of reaction products in the bulk stream on the active layer side, thus reducing the downstream separation needs.

[1]  Geert Versteeg,et al.  A non-permselective membrane reactor for chemical processes normally requiring strict stoichiometric feed rates of reactants , 1990 .

[2]  A. Burggraaf,et al.  Reactor studies using alumina separation membranes for the dehydrogenation of methanol and n-butane , 1991 .

[3]  Philippe Cini,et al.  Experimental study of the tubular multiphase catalyst , 1991 .

[4]  S. Agarwalla,et al.  Use of a membrane reactor to improve selectivity to intermediate products in consecutive catalytic reactions , 1992 .

[5]  C. Vayenas,et al.  Dependence of catalytic rates on catalyst work function , 1990, Nature.

[6]  A. Burggraaf,et al.  Reactions of methanol over catalytically active alumina membranes , 1991 .

[7]  Yi-Ming Sun,et al.  Catalytic membrane for simultaneous chemical reaction and separation applied to a dehydrogenation reaction , 1988 .

[8]  A. Burggraaf,et al.  Gas separation mechanisms in microporous modified γ-al2o3 membranes , 1988 .

[9]  C. A. Smolders,et al.  High-Temperature Membrane Reactor for Catalytic Gas-Solid Reactions , 1992 .

[10]  M. Misono,et al.  The Dehydrogenation of Cyclohexane by the Use of a Porous-glass Reactor , 1982 .

[11]  V. Gryaznov Hydrogen Permeable Palladium Membrane Catalysts , 1986, Platinum Metals Review.

[12]  J. Armor,et al.  Catalysis with permselective inorganic membranes , 1989 .

[13]  A. Burggraaf,et al.  The preparation and characterization of alumina membranes with ultra-fine pores , 1984 .

[14]  R. De Vos,et al.  The cross-flow catalyst reactor. An alternative for liquid phase hydrogenations , 1982 .

[15]  Philippe Cini,et al.  Preparation and characterization of modified tubular ceramic membranes for use as catalyst supports , 1991 .

[16]  R. G. Minet,et al.  A high temperature catalytic membrane reactor for ethane dehydrogenation , 1990 .

[17]  A. J. Burggraaf,et al.  The preparation and characterization of alumina membranes with ultrafine pores: 2. The formation of supported membranes , 1985 .

[18]  D. Eng,et al.  Catalytic and Electrocatalytic Methane Oxidation with Solid Gxide Membranes , 1991 .

[19]  A. Burggraaf,et al.  Reactions of methanol over alumina catalytically activ membranes modified by silver , 1991 .