MODELING LEFT-TRUNCATED AND RIGHT-CENSORED SURVIVAL DATA WITH LONGITUDINAL COVARIATES.

There is a surge in medical follow-up studies that include longitudinal covariates in the modeling of survival data. So far, the focus has been largely on right censored survival data. We consider survival data that are subject to both left truncation and right censoring. Left truncation is well known to produce biased sample. The sampling bias issue has been resolved in the literature for the case which involves baseline or time-varying covariates that are observable. The problem remains open however for the important case where longitudinal covariates are present in survival models. A joint likelihood approach has been shown in the literature to provide an effective way to overcome those difficulties for right censored data, but this approach faces substantial additional challenges in the presence of left truncation. Here we thus propose an alternative likelihood to overcome these difficulties and show that the regression coefficient in the survival component can be estimated unbiasedly and efficiently. Issues about the bias for the longitudinal component are discussed. The new approach is illustrated numerically through simulations and data from a multi-center AIDS cohort study.

[1]  A. Lazzarin,et al.  The natural history of HIV infection in intravenous drug users: risk of disease progression in a cohort of seroconverters. , 1989, AIDS.

[2]  T. Louis.  Finding the Observed Information Matrix When Using the EM Algorithm , 1982 .

[3]  Rizopoulos Dimitris,et al.  Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Time-to-Event Data , 2014 .

[4]  G. Rezza.  Disease Progression and Early Predictors of AIDS in HIV‐Seroconverted Injecting Drug Users the Italian Seroconversion Study , 1992, AIDS.

[5]  Y. Vardi.  Empirical Distributions in Selection Bias Models , 1985 .

[6]  Melinda Wang.  Product limit estimates: a generalized maximum likelihood study , 1987 .

[7]  F. Hsieh,et al.  Joint modelling of accelerated failure time and longitudinal data , 2005 .

[8]  F. Hsieh,et al.  Joint Modeling of Survival and Longitudinal Data: Likelihood Approach Revisited , 2006, Biometrics.

[9]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[10]  J. Klein,et al.  Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data , 1997 .

[11]  Marie Davidian,et al.  A Semiparametric Likelihood Approach to Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Time‐to‐Event Data , 2002, Biometrics.

[12]  D. Lynden-Bell,et al.  A Method of Allowing for Known Observational Selection in Small Samples Applied to 3CR Quasars , 1971 .

[13]  M. Woodroofe.  Estimating a Distribution Function with Truncated Data , 1985 .

[14]  A A Tsiatis,et al.  Evaluating surrogate markers of clinical outcome when measured with error. , 1998, Biometrics.

[15]  J. Klein,et al.  Statistical Models Based On Counting Process , 1994 .

[16]  D. Zeng,et al.  Asymptotic results for maximum likelihood estimators in joint analysis of repeated measurements and survival time , 2005, math/0602240.

[17]  A. W. van der Vaart,et al.  On Profile Likelihood , 2000 .

[18]  Jon A. Wellner,et al.  Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: With Applications to Statistics , 1996 .

[19]  M. Wulfsohn,et al.  A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error. , 1997, Biometrics.

[20]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .

[21]  M. Wulfsohn,et al.  Modeling the Relationship of Survival to Longitudinal Data Measured with Error. Applications to Survival and CD4 Counts in Patients with AIDS , 1995 .

[22]  V. De Gruttola,et al.  Modelling progression of CD4-lymphocyte count and its relationship to survival time. , 1994, Biometrics.

[23]  R Henderson,et al.  Joint modelling of longitudinal measurements and event time data. , 2000, Biostatistics.

[24]  I. Grama,et al.  Asymptotic theory for the Cox model with missing time-dependent covariate , 2006, math/0607033.