Implicitly and Intelligently Influencing the Interactive Experience

Enabling intuitive interaction in system design remains an art more than a science. This difficulty is exacerbated when the diversity of device and end user group is considered. In this paper, it is argued that conventional interaction modalities are unsuitable in many circumstances and that alternative modalities need be considered. Specifically the case of implicit interaction is considered, and the paper discusses how its use may lead to more satisfactory experiences. Specifically, harnessing implicit interaction in conjunction with the traditional explicit interaction modality, can enable a more intuitive and natural interactive experience. However, the exercise of capturing and interpreting implicit interaction is problematic and is one that lends itself to the adoption of AI techniques. In this position paper, the potential of lightweight intelligent agents is proposed as a model for harmonising the explicit and implicit components of an arbitrary interaction.

[1]  Gregory M. P. O'Hare,et al.  Towards Pervasive Intelligence: Reflections on the Evolution of the Agent Factory Framework , 2009, Multi-Agent Programming, Languages, Tools and Applications.

[2]  Virpi Roto,et al.  Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile HCI , 2005, CHI.

[3]  Sharon Oviatt,et al.  Multimodal interactive maps: designing for human performance , 1997 .

[4]  Wenji Mao,et al.  Social Computing: From Social Informatics to Social Intelligence , 2007, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[5]  Maja Pantic,et al.  Social signal processing: Survey of an emerging domain , 2009, Image Vis. Comput..

[6]  Jürgen Dix,et al.  Multi-Agent Programming , 2009, Springer US.

[7]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  The Belief-Desire-Intention Model of Agency , 1998, ATAL.

[8]  John F. Bradley,et al.  Embedded agents: a paradigm for mobile services , 2006, Int. J. Web Grid Serv..

[9]  Stephan Herrmann,et al.  Model-view-controller and object teams: a perfect match of paradigms , 2003, AOSD '03.

[10]  Gregory M. P. O'Hare,et al.  Easishop: Ambient intelligence assists everyday shopping , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[11]  A. Pentland Social Signal Processing [Exploratory DSP] , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[12]  D. Goleman Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships , 2006 .

[13]  E. Thorndike Intelligence and its uses. , 1920 .

[14]  Emile H. L. Aarts,et al.  Ambient Intelligence 2.0: Towards Synergetic Prosperity , 2009, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ..

[15]  P. Ekman,et al.  The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding , 1969 .

[16]  Nicu Sebe,et al.  Multimodal interfaces: Challenges and perspectives , 2009, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ..

[17]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[18]  W. Buxton Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[19]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction (3rd Edition) , 2003 .

[20]  M. Argyle,et al.  The Communication of Inferior and Superior Attitudes by Verbal and Non‐verbal Signals* , 1970 .

[21]  Wendy Ju,et al.  The Design of Implicit Interactions: Making Interactive Systems Less Obnoxious , 2008, Design Issues.

[22]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages: A Survey , 1995, ECAI Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages.

[23]  Gregory M. P. O'Hare,et al.  Delivering adaptivity through context-awareness , 2007, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..