Computer-aided diagnostics in digital pathology: automated evaluation of early-phase pancreatic cancer in mice

Purpose   Digital pathology diagnostics are often based on subjective qualitative measures. A murine model of early-phase pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma provides a controlled environment with a priori knowledge of the genetic mutation and stage of the disease. Use of this model enables the application of supervised learning methods to digital pathology. A computerized diagnostics system for histological detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma was developed and tested.Methods Pathological H&E-stained specimens with early pancreatic lesions were identified and evaluated with a system that models cancer detection using a top-down object learning paradigm, mimicking the way a pathologist learns. First, the dominant primitives were identified and segmented in the images, i.e., the ducts, nuclei and tumor stroma. A boost-based machine learning technique was used for duct segmentation, classification and outlier pruning. Second, a set of morphological features traditionally used for cancer diagnosis which provides quantitative image features was employed to quantify subtle findings such as duct deformation and nuclei malformations. Finally, a visually interpretable predictive model was trained to distinguish between normal tissue and premalignant cancer lesions, given ground truth samples.Results A predictive success rate of 92 % was achieved using tenfold cross-validation and 93 % on an independent test set. Comparison was made with state-of-the-art classification algorithms that are not interpretable as visible features yielded the contribution of individual primitive features to the prediction outcome.Conclusions Quantitative image analysis and classification were successful in preclinical histology diagnosis for early-stage pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The usage of annotated contours coupled with interpretable supervised learning methods and outlier pruning can be adapted to other medical imaging tasks. The usage of interpretable supervised learning techniques may improve the success of CAD in histopathological diagnosis.

[1]  Ehud Rivlin,et al.  Cell nuclei segmentation using fuzzy logic engine , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04..

[2]  Rich Caruana,et al.  An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms , 2006, ICML.

[3]  C. Galbán,et al.  Oncogenic Kras is required for both the initiation and maintenance of pancreatic cancer in mice. , 2012, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[4]  Bikash Sabata,et al.  Digital pathology imaging - The next frontier in medical imaging , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS).

[5]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Marker-controlled watershed segmentation of nuclei in H&E stained breast cancer biopsy images , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[6]  Abderrahim Elmoataz,et al.  Multi-resolution graph-based analysis of histopathological whole slide images: Application to mitotic cell extraction and visualization , 2011, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[7]  Lakhmi C. Jain,et al.  Innovations in machine learning : theory and applications , 2006 .

[8]  Brian C. Lovell,et al.  Unsupervised cell nucleus segmentation with active contours , 1998, Signal Process..

[9]  Serge Beucher,et al.  THE WATERSHED TRANSFORMATION APPLIED TO IMAGE SEGMENTATION , 2009 .

[10]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1995, EuroCOLT.

[11]  J. Saltz,et al.  Image Analysis for Neuroblastoma Classification: Segmentation of Cell Nuclei , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  Alexander Vezhnevets,et al.  Avoiding Boosting Overfitting by Removing Confusing Samples , 2007, ECML.

[13]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: Historical review, current status and future potential , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[14]  R. Hruban,et al.  Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[15]  Michael H. Brill,et al.  Color appearance models , 1998 .

[16]  Dan Roth Learning Based Programming , 1999 .

[17]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1997, EuroCOLT.

[18]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Automated gland and nuclei segmentation for grading of prostate and breast cancer histopathology , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[19]  Constantine Katsinis,et al.  Large-scale computations on histology images reveal grade-differentiating parameters for breast cancer , 2006, BMC Medical Imaging.

[20]  Mark D. Fairchild,et al.  Color Appearance Models: Fairchild/Color Appearance Models , 2013 .

[21]  H. Kocher,et al.  Pancreatic Cancer , 2019, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[22]  Serge J. Belongie,et al.  Unsupervised Color Decomposition Of Histologically Stained Tissue Samples , 2003, NIPS.

[23]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  AUTOMATED GRADING OF PROSTATE CANCER USING ARCHITECTURAL AND TEXTURAL IMAGE FEATURES , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[24]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  A Boosted Bayesian Multiresolution Classifier for Prostate Cancer Detection From Digitized Needle Biopsies , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Jun Kong,et al.  Computer-aided prognosis of neuroblastoma on whole-slide images: Classification of stromal development , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[26]  L. Rodney Long,et al.  Histology image analysis for carcinoma detection and grading , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[27]  A. Fischer,et al.  Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue and cell sections. , 2008, CSH protocols.

[28]  Christophoros Nikou,et al.  Watershed-based segmentation of cell nuclei boundaries in Pap smear images , 2010, Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Information Technology and Applications in Biomedicine.

[29]  A. Madabhushi,et al.  Histopathological Image Analysis: A Review , 2009, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  David A. Tuveson,et al.  The Use of Targeted Mouse Models for Preclinical Testing of Novel Cancer Therapeutics , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[31]  Mark D. Fairchild,et al.  Color Appearance Models , 1997, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[32]  R. Hruban,et al.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: update on the surgical pathology of carcinomas of ductal origin and PanINs , 2007, Modern Pathology.