Video-assisted thoracoscopic treatment of pneumothorax

In the last three decades, minimally invasive techniques have progressively gained acceptance, as shown by the numerous studies published in the literature. Before the 1990s, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was considered feasible almost exclusively for the diagnosis of pleural diseases. The availability of better instruments and endoscopic stapling devices allowed thoracoscopy to evolve into a new “therapeutic era”. Nowadays, VATS is considered the approach of choice for the treatment of pneumothorax and other lung, mediastinal and esophageal diseases, replacing traditional approaches as thoracotomy and sternotomy. The use of ports through small incisions (one to three-four) for the camera and surgical instruments allows the surgeon to explore the pleural cavity and work easily on the lung parenchyma. This approach translates into less discomfort for the patient, reduced morbidity, shorten hospital stay and faster functional recovery. The optimal treatment of pneumothorax certainly refers thoracoscopy as the approach of choice maintaining the same indications as for open surgery.

[1]  T. Walles,et al.  Management of Spontaneous Pneumothorax and Postinterventional Pneumothorax: German S3-Guideline S3-Leitlinie: Diagnostik und Therapie von Spontanpneumothorax und postinterventionellem Pneumothorax , 2018, Zentralblatt für Chirurgie.

[2]  Yanlong Yang,et al.  Single-incision versus conventional three-port video-assisted surgery in the treatment of pneumothorax: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[3]  N. Rahman,et al.  Effectiveness of chemical pleurodesis in spontaneous pneumothorax recurrence prevention: a systematic review , 2016, Thorax.

[4]  L. Xian,et al.  Uniportal versus three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a meta-analysis. , 2015, Journal of thoracic disease.

[5]  Jin-Shing Chen,et al.  The etiology and therapy of primary spontaneous pneumothoraces , 2015, Expert review of respiratory medicine.

[6]  P. V. Van Schil,et al.  ERS task force statement: diagnosis and treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax , 2015, European Respiratory Journal.

[7]  Mo-yu Ming,et al.  The Effect of Pleural Abrasion on the Treatment of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  N. Katsikogiannis,et al.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery and pneumothorax. , 2015, Journal of thoracic disease.

[9]  Jeong Su Cho,et al.  Staple line coverage after bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized trial. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  Yueqin Huang,et al.  Mechanical pleurodesis does not reduce recurrence of spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized trial. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  Wing-Kai Chan,et al.  Simple aspiration and drainage and intrapleural minocycline pleurodesis versus simple aspiration and drainage for the initial treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: an open-label, parallel-group, prospective, randomised, controlled trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[12]  R. Malthaner,et al.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy and talc poudrage for spontaneous pneumothoraces: effect on short-term lung function. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  A. Arnold,et al.  Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010 , 2010, Thorax.

[14]  K. Nakanishi An apical symphysial technique using a wide absorbable mesh placed on the apex for primary spontaneous pneumothorax , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[15]  C. Pona,et al.  Surgical pleurodesis for Vanderschueren's stage III primary spontaneous pneumothorax , 2008, European Respiratory Journal.

[16]  T. Muramatsu,et al.  Staple Line Reinforcement with Fleece-Coated Fibrin Glue (TachoComb) After Thoracoscopic Bullectomy for the Treatment of Spontaneous Pneumothorax , 2007, Surgery Today.

[17]  C. Ng,et al.  Video assisted thoracic surgery in the management of spontaneous pneumothorax: the current status , 2006, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[18]  Y.C. Chang,et al.  Modified needlescopic video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[19]  A. Sihoe,et al.  Incidence of chest wall paresthesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. , 2004, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[20]  J. Ravn,et al.  [Video-assisted thoracoscopic treatment of pneumothorax]. , 2004, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[21]  T. Omori,et al.  Staple line coverage with absorbable mesh after thoracoscopic bullectomy for spontaneous pneumothorax , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[22]  T. Naruke,et al.  Impact of additional pleurodesis in video-assisted thoracoscopic bullectomy for primary spontaneous pneumothorax , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy.

[23]  B. Passlick,et al.  Incidence of chronic pain after minimal-invasive surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax. , 2001, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[24]  S. Knight,et al.  Efficacy study of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pleurodesis for spontaneous pneumothorax. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[25]  A. Ayed,et al.  The results of thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. , 2000, Chest.

[26]  N. Nesher,et al.  [Videothorascopic sympathectomy (VATS) for palmar hyperhidriosis:summary of a clinical trial and surgical results]. , 2000, Harefuah.

[27]  J. Olak,et al.  Anatomy and physiology of the pleural space. , 1994, Chest Surgery Clinics of North America.

[28]  K. Viskum,et al.  Spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of simple drainage, talc pleurodesis, and tetracycline pleurodesis. , 1989, Thorax.