How motion verbs are special: The interaction of semantic and pragmatic information in aspectual verb meanings

This paper focuses on a distinction between two kinds of information in verb meanings: a highly structured, templatic part of the meaning, based on aspectual properties of the verb, and apart of the meaning which contributes to filling gaps in the templatic information. The two kinds of information differ in the nature and degree of connections to encyclopedic world knowledge. This demarcation between the two kinds of information is related to the semantics/ pragmatics distinction, and may be clearly articulated using Krifka's (1992) formalization of a homomorphism from objects to events. Motion verbs, for which the concept of distance plays a crucial role in the gap-filling information, are shown to be special in a number of ways, due to the special properties of distance as encoded in the world knowledge of the speaker. The possible universality of these findings is also discussed.

[1]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  (1) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms; and , 1987 .

[2]  C. Tenny.  Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness , 1987 .

[3]  M. Dascal.  Pragmatics and the Philosophy of Mind: Vol. I: Thought in Language , 1983 .

[4]  Jeffrey S. Gruber,et al.  Lexical structures in syntax and semantics , 1976 .

[5]  Teun Hoekstra,et al.  Small clause results , 1988 .

[6]  D. Bolinger.  The phrasal verb in English , 1974 .

[7]  Ken Hale,et al.  The syntactic character of thematic structure , 1992 .

[8]  Jeffrey Gruber.  Studies in lexical relations , 1965 .

[9]  B. Levin,et al.  What to do with theta-roles , 1986 .

[10]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference , 1988, CL.

[11]  Malka Rappaport Hovav,et al.  The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: the perspective from unaccusativity , 1992 .

[12]  益子 真由美.  Argument Structure , 1993, The Lexicon.

[13]  A. Porter.  Definitions and Theories , 1994 .

[14]  R. Jackendoff.  The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory , 1987 .

[15]  Denis Bouchard,et al.  From Conceptual Structure to Syntactic Structure , 1991 .

[16]  Henk J. Verkuyl,et al.  A Theory of Aspectuality: References , 1993 .

[17]  Braj B. Kachru,et al.  ISSUES IN LINGUISTICS , 1973 .

[18]  R. Jackendoff.  The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in english , 1996 .

[19]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  Thematic Relations as Links between Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution , 1992 .

[20]  Beth Levin,et al.  Lexical semantics in review , 1985 .

[21]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .

[22]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  The syntax of event structure , 1991, Cognition.

[23]  Carol Lee Tenny,et al.  Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface , 1994 .

[24]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[25]  Max J. Cresswell,et al.  Logics and languages , 1973 .

[26]  Erhard W. Hinrichs,et al.  A compositional semantics for aktionsarten and NP reference in English , 1985 .

[27]  Glynn Winskel,et al.  Event Structures , 1986, Advances in Petri Nets.

[28]  Tim Stowell,et al.  Origins of phrase structure , 1981 .

[29]  H. Verkuyl.  Aspectual classes and aspectual composition , 1989 .

[30]  Ken Hale,et al.  Some transitivity alternations in English , 1986 .

[31]  Alec Marantz.  The way construction and the semantics of direct arguments in English , 1992 .

[32]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[33]  Bruce Fraser,et al.  The verb-particle combination in English , 1976 .

[34]  Maria Luisa Zubizarreta,et al.  Levels of representation in the lexicon and in the syntax , 1987 .

[35]  M. Halliday.  NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .