"Agile Meets Non-Agile": Implications of Adopting Agile Practices at Enterprises

The question of how to increase speed and flexibility in times of digital disruption is essential to virtually any company. While previous research focuses on agility as software development practice or as form for organizing start-ups, little knowledge exists about agility at enterprises and its implications. Agile practices are currently adopted at enterprises in large-scale. While first steps towards agility are made quickly, we observed that specific challenges emerge when enterprises adopt agile practices. Drawing on results of an explorative study with ten global companies and on socio-technical systems theory, we reveal that adopting agile practices has far-reaching implications on products, processes, technology, people, and structure. This study contributes to agility research with specific insights on enterprise agility and its implications. While enterprises need to increase speed and flexibility to master digital transformation, an early incorporation of the implications of adopting agile practices fosters its sustainable implementation.

[1]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Meta-Theory for Understanding Information Systems Within Sociotechnical Systems , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  P. Weill,et al.  Thriving in an increasingly digital ecosystem , 2015 .

[3]  Nils Urbach,et al.  How to Implement Agile IT setups: a Taxonomy of Design options , 2017, ECIS.

[4]  Hong Li,et al.  The Journey to Enterprise Agility - Systems Thinking and Organizational Legacy , 2017 .

[5]  W. R. Howard Agile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products , 2010 .

[6]  Eric Overby,et al.  A Framework for Enterprise Agility and the Enabling Role of Digital Options , 2005, Business Agility and Information Technology Diffusion.

[7]  Klaas-Jan Stol,et al.  Continuous software engineering: A roadmap and agenda , 2017, J. Syst. Softw..

[8]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  Goals Gone Wild: The Systematic Side Effects of Overprescribing Goal Setting , 2009 .

[9]  Pekka Abrahamsson,et al.  ‘Lots done, more to do’: the current state of agile systems development research , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  A. Langley,et al.  Templates and Turns in Qualitative Studies of Strategy and Management , 2011 .

[11]  M. Kathryn Brohman,et al.  Dynamic Ambidexterity: Exploiting Exploration for Business Success in the Digital Age , 2017, ICIS.

[12]  Kari Smolander,et al.  Challenges in Transitioning to an Agile Way of Working , 2017, HICSS.

[13]  Xiaofeng Wang,et al.  Assimilation of agile practices in use , 2012, Inf. Syst. J..

[14]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[15]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Kai Petersen,et al.  Agile Software Development Practice Adoption Survey , 2012, XP.

[17]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Not so Shore Anymore: The New Imperatives When Sourcing in the Age of Open , 2015, ECIS.

[18]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[19]  Kieran Conboy,et al.  Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  P BostromRobert,et al.  MIS Problems and failures a socio-technical perspective part II , 1977 .

[21]  Orit Hazzan,et al.  The Agile Manifesto , 2014 .

[22]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Explaining information systems change: a punctuated socio-technical change model , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..