Subgrid‐scale treatment for major point sources in an Eulerian model: A sensitivity study on the European Tracer Experiment (ETEX) and Chernobyl cases

We investigate the plume-in-grid method for a subgrid-scale treatment of major point sources in the passive case. This method consists in an on-line coupling of a Gaussian pu model and an Eulerian model, which better represents the point emissions without signicantly increasing the computational burden. In this paper, the plume-in-grid model implemented on the Polyphemus air quality modeling system is described, with an emphasis on the parameterizations available for the Gaussian dispersion, and on the coupling with the Eulerian model. The study evaluates the model for passive tracers at continental scale with the ETEX experiment and the Chernobyl case. The aim is to (1) estimate the model sensitivity to the local-scale parameterizations, and (2) to bring insights on the spatial and temporal scales that are relevant in the use of a plume-in-grid model. It is found that the plume-in-grid treatment improves the vertical diusion at local-scale, thus reducing the bias -- especially at the closest stations. Doury's Gaussian parameterization and a column injection method give the best results. There is a strong sensitivity of the results to the injection time and the grid resolution. The "best" injection time actually depends on the resolution, but is difficult to determine a priori. The plume-in-grid method is also found to improve the results at ne resolutions more than with coarse grids, by compensating the Eulerian tendency to over-predict the concentrations at these resolutions.

[1]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[2]  Marc Bocquet Reconstruction of an atmospheric tracer source using the principle of maximum entropy. II: Applications , 2005 .

[3]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  Diffusion by Continuous Movements , 1922 .

[4]  F. Girardi,et al.  The field campaigns of the European Tracer Experiment (ETEX): overview and results , 1998 .

[5]  A. Stohl Computation, accuracy and applications of trajectories—A review and bibliography , 1998 .

[6]  Vivien Mallet,et al.  Development and validation of a fully modular platform for numerical modelling of air pollution: POLAIR , 2004 .

[7]  Jens Havskov Sørensen,et al.  Sensitivity of the DERMA long-range Gaussian dispersion model to meteorological input and diffusion parameters , 1998 .

[8]  D. Byun,et al.  Review of the Governing Equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System , 2006 .

[9]  J. Louis A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere , 1979 .

[10]  J. Weil Dispersion in the Convective Boundary Layer , 1988 .

[11]  L. M. Frohn,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Modelling Transport and Deposition of Caesium and Iodine from the Chernobyl Accident Using the Dream Model , 2002 .

[12]  Lin Wu,et al.  Technical Note: The air quality modeling system Polyphemus , 2007 .

[13]  A. Russell,et al.  Development of a computationally efficient, reactive subgrid‐scale plume model and the impact in the northeastern United States using increasing levels of chemical detail , 1996 .

[14]  R. H. Maryon,et al.  Tropospheric dispersion: The first ten days after a puff release , 1995 .

[15]  Steven R. Hanna,et al.  Handbook on atmospheric diffusion , 1982 .

[16]  Marc Bocquet,et al.  Validation of the Polyphemus platform on the ETEX, Chernobyl and Algeciras cases , 2007 .

[17]  I. Troen,et al.  A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation , 1986 .

[18]  Steven R. Hanna,et al.  Applications in Air Pollution Modeling , 1984 .

[19]  R. H. Maryon,et al.  Validation of the UK Met. Office’s name model against the ETEX dataset , 1998 .

[20]  R. Bellasio,et al.  A statistical methodology for the evaluation of long-range dispersion models: an application to the ETEX exercise , 1998 .

[21]  Zahari Zlatev,et al.  Using a combination of two models in tracer simulations , 1996 .

[22]  Prakash Karamchandani,et al.  Development and application of a state-of-the-science plume-in-grid model , 2002 .

[23]  Zahari Zlatev,et al.  Testing the importance of accurate meteorological input fields and parameterizations in atmospheric transport modelling using dream - validation against ETEX-1 , 1998 .

[24]  Christian Seigneur,et al.  On the treatment of point source emissions in urban air quality modeling , 1983 .

[25]  S. Arya Air Pollution Meteorology and Dispersion , 1998 .

[26]  Marc Bocquet,et al.  Inverse modelling-based reconstruction of the Chernobyl source term available for long-range transport , 2007 .

[27]  Vivien Mallet,et al.  Comparative Study of Gaussian Dispersion Formulas within the Polyphemus Platform: Evaluation with Prairie Grass and Kincaid Experiments , 2009 .

[28]  B. Carissimo,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of an Eulerian CFD and Gaussian Plume Models Based on Prairie Grass Dispersion Experiment , 2008 .

[29]  Marc Bocquet,et al.  Reconstruction of an atmospheric tracer source using the principle of maximum entropy. I: Theory , 2005 .

[30]  Andreas Stohl,et al.  Evaluation of trajectories calculated from ecmwf data against constant volume balloon flights during etex , 1998 .