Exploring student control over data privacy through speculative design

Higher education institutions face a number of questions about the data they gather from students and how it will be used in the future. Between commercial incentives for collecting student data and anxieties about the privacy and security of that data, lies the intentional sharing exemplified by the ‘Quantified Self’ movement, when users voluntarily provide information for personal development. Though there are risks to making student data available to third-party service providers, students could benefit from advanced learning analytics that personalise their educational experience. This research paper describes how designers of educational technologies can use ‘speculative design’ as an approach to exploring these possibilities, enabling positive future potentials that enable students to control the data they share.

[1]  William DeAngelis,et al.  Academic Deans, Codes of Ethics, and……Fiduciary Duties? , 2014 .

[2]  Sonja Trainor Student data privacy is cloudy today, clearer tomorrow , 2015 .

[3]  S. Yelavich Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming , 2015 .

[4]  James Auger,et al.  Speculative design: crafting the speculation , 2013, Digit. Creativity.

[5]  Mark MacCarthy New Directions in Privacy: Disclosure, Unfairness and Externalities , 2011 .

[6]  P. Prinsloo,et al.  Learning Analytics , 2013 .

[7]  C. DiSalvo,et al.  FCJ-142 Spectacles and Tropes: Speculative Design and Contemporary Food Cultures , 2012 .

[8]  John Fritz,et al.  Classroom walls that talk: Using online course activity data of successful students to raise self-awareness of underperforming peers , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[9]  Paul Prinsloo,et al.  Student perspectives on the use of their data: between intrusion, surveillance and care , 2015 .

[10]  Bettina Nissen,et al.  Metadating: Exploring the Romance and Future of Personal Data , 2016, CHI.

[11]  Nathaniel Good,et al.  Empirical Studies on Software Notices to Inform Policy Makers and Usability Designers , 2007, Financial Cryptography.

[12]  Elizabeth Boling,et al.  Inscribing ethics and values in designs for learning: a problematic , 2016 .

[13]  Mary Shaw,et al.  Comparing Architectural Design Styles , 1995, IEEE Softw..

[14]  Paul Prinsloo,et al.  Student privacy self-management: implications for learning analytics , 2015, LAK.

[15]  George Siemens,et al.  Learning Analytics , 2013 .

[16]  Jan Bosch,et al.  Software Architecture as a Set of Architectural Design Decisions , 2005, 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA'05).