Low-dose chest CT: optimizing radiation protection for patients.

OBJECTIVE The aim of our study was to evaluate CT scanning protocols to determine how best to minimize patient exposure to ionizing radiation while maintaining sufficient image quality to detect pulmonary diseases. SUBJECT AND METHODS The CT dose index (CTDI) was determined by scanning an acrylic phantom at various tube current-time products (7.5-115 mAs). Image quality was evaluated by comparing the homogeneity and noise level of CT scans obtained in the acrylic phantom with those obtained in a water-equivalent phantom. The CT scans obtained at various milliampere-second settings in patients with nodules or diffuse opacifications were assessed. The relationships between the CTDI and the image quality of the CT scans (noise level and artifacts) were established. RESULTS The reduction of a conventional tube current-time product (115 mAs) by 65%, 78%, or 93.5% can decrease the CTDI by 60%, 70%, or 85%, respectively. In correlating the image quality of each CT scan to the milliampere-second settings used to obtain it, we found that homogeneity decreased as milliampere-second settings decreased, whereas the noise level increased as milliampere-second settings decreased. For both 8- and 3-mm slice thicknesses, the homogeneity of CT scans acquired at 7.5 mAs or greater was within the acceptable range (< 4 H). However, the noise level of CT scans remained within the acceptable range (< 0.35%) when 25 mAs or greater was used. The evaluation of the image quality of the patients' CT scans indicated no statistical significance in image quality rating between the scans obtained at 25 mAs and those obtained at 115 mAs (p > 0.01). CONCLUSION Low-dose (i.e., 40 or 25 mAs) helical chest CT produced satisfactory image quality and reduced the CTDI, thereby maximally protecting patients from radiation exposure.

[1]  D. McCauley,et al.  Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations. , 1990, Radiology.

[2]  D. Brenner,et al.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  N. Müller,et al.  Low-dose high-resolution CT of lung parenchyma. , 1991, Radiology.

[4]  Zhao Shaohon Early lung cancer baseline screening: preliminary study with low-dose spiral CT , 2002 .

[5]  O S Miettinen,et al.  Early lung cancer action project: a summary of the findings on baseline screening. , 2001, The oncologist.

[6]  D. Frush,et al.  Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Icrp 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 1991 .

[8]  Ultra low-dose helical CT of the chest. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  K Murata,et al.  Ultra low-dose helical CT of the chest: evaluation in clinical cases. , 1999, Radiation medicine.

[10]  Jo-Anne Shepard,et al.  Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Zhuang Xiao-hua The relationship between image quality and CT dose index of multi-slice low-dose chest CT , 2003 .

[12]  H Rusinek,et al.  Pulmonary nodule detection: low-dose versus conventional CT. , 1998, Radiology.

[13]  C A Kelsey,et al.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[14]  Hajime Nakata,et al.  Lung cancer screening using low-dose spiral CT: results of baseline and 1-year follow-up studies. , 2002, Chest.

[15]  Lee F Rogers,et al.  Dose reduction in CT: how low can we go? , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  A S Brody,et al.  Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large Children's Hospital. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  W. Heindel,et al.  Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. , 2002, Radiology.

[18]  G. Enríquez,et al.  Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  T M Yelbuz,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT. , 1999, Radiology.

[20]  Nevzat Karabulut,et al.  Comparison of low-dose and standard-dose helical CT in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules , 2002, European Radiology.

[21]  T. Slovis,et al.  Children, computed tomography radiation dose, and the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) concept. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[22]  O S Miettinen,et al.  Early Lung Cancer Action Project , 2001, Cancer.

[23]  Michael F McNitt-Gray,et al.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[24]  Michael Thomas,et al.  Screening for asymptomatic early bronchogenic carcinoma with low dose CT of the chest , 2000, Cancer.

[25]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Low-dose spiral CT: applicability to paediatric chest imaging , 1999, Pediatric Radiology.

[26]  M. Ambrosino,et al.  Feasibility of high-resolution, low-dose chest CT in evaluating the pediatric chest , 2005, Pediatric Radiology.

[27]  H. Ohmatsu,et al.  Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. , 1996, Radiology.