Attribution Theory and Discipline Arbitration

This study focuses on 230 male arbitrators' decisions in a hypothetical discharge grievance case. An analysis of the responses supports the central proposition of attribution theory that a decision-maker's response to an individual's action largely depends on the decision-maker's attributions of causality or responsibility for the action. The analysis also shows that, all else equal, the arbitrators tended to specify a more lenient penalty when the grievant was female than when the grievant was male; and more experienced arbitrators tended to decide either completely in favor of the grievant or completely in favor of the employer, whereas less experienced arbitrators tended to make compromise decisions.

[1]  Perry A. Zirkel,et al.  The Consistency and Predictability of Grievance Arbitration Awards , 1990 .

[2]  Brian Bemmels.  The Effect of Grievants' Gender on Arbitrators' Decisions , 1988 .

[3]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Attributions and Actions: A Note of Caution , 1982 .

[4]  Martin H. Greenberg,et al.  Social Psychology of the Criminal Justice System , 1982 .

[5]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Those who are number two try harder: The effect of sex on attributions of causality. , 1974 .

[6]  Nels E. Nelson,et al.  Arbitrator Characteristics and Arbitral Decisions , 1981 .

[7]  H. Garland,et al.  Attitudes Toward Women in Management and Attributions for Their Success and Failure in a Managerial Position. , 1977 .

[8]  Brian Bemmels,et al.  Arbitrator characteristics and arbitrator decisions , 1990 .

[9]  R. Block,et al.  The Impact of Attorneys and Arbitrators on Arbitration Awards , 1987 .

[10]  R. W. Fleming.  The labor arbitration process , 1967 .

[11]  G. Dobbins.  Effects of Gender on Leaders' Responses to Poor Performers: An Attributional Interpretation , 1985 .

[12]  C. Scott,et al.  The effect of gender on arbitration decisions , 1989 .

[13]  R. Lord,et al.  Theoretical, Information Processing, and Situational Factors Affecting Attribution Theory Models of Organizational Behavior , 1983 .

[14]  H. Kelley,et al.  Attribution theory and research. , 1980, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  H. G. Heneman,et al.  Arbitrators’ backgrounds and behavior , 1983 .

[16]  K. Deaux,et al.  Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. , 1974 .

[17]  T. Mitchell,et al.  Attributional processes of leaders in leader–member interactions. , 1979 .

[18]  H. Kelley.  Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[19]  Gerald L. Rose.  Sex effects on effort attributions in managerial performance evaluation , 1978 .

[20]  B. Gutek,et al.  Sex Effects on Evaluation , 1980 .

[21]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  The perceived cause of work success as a mediator of sex discrimination in organizations , 1978 .

[22]  E. E. Jones.  Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .

[23]  Brian Bemmels.  Gender Effects in Discharge Arbitration , 1988 .