Clinicopathologic features and prognosis for wilms' tumor patients with metastases at diagnosis

Comparisons were made between 236 Wilms' tumor patients with metastasis to the lungs and/or liver at initial diagnosis who were registered on the National Wilms' Tumor Study (NWTS) during 1969 to 1983, and 1755 patients who did not have overt metastases at diagnosis. Patients with evidence of regional spread of disease beyond the kidney, especially if to the renal vein or lymph nodes, were much more likely to have overt metastases present at diagnosis than those with apparently localized disease. The presence of metastases was also correlated with age at diagnosis, ranging from 1% among infants younger than 1 year of age to 24% for those aged 6 years or older. The percentage of tumor deaths for patients with metastases at diagnosis (Stage IV) and a primary tumor of favorable histology (FH) declined from 29% at 2 years postdiagnosis on the first therapeutic trial (NWTS‐1) to 9% for the most recent one (NWTS‐3), and is now comparable to that for patients without metastases but with nonresectable local invasion at diagnosis (Stage III). The local extent of disease also influenced the survival outcome for Stage IV/FH patients. Survival was poor for those with anaplastic or sarcomatous (unfavorable) histology, regardless of local staging or trial. There was no difference in survival according to metastatic site (liver ± lung vs. lung only) if present prior to treatment. By contrast, patients who developed liver metastases during or after treatment had an especially poor chance for survival as compared with those who developed lung deposits at those times.

[1]  Nathan Mantel,et al.  Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom , 1963 .

[2]  L. R. Hill,et al.  Wilms' tumor: Prognostic factors for patients without metastases at diagnosis. Results of the national Wilms' tumor study , 1978, Cancer.

[3]  V. Farewell,et al.  Patterns of intra-abdominal relapse (IAR) in patients with Wilms' tumor who received radiation: analysis by histopathology. A report of National Wilms' Tumor Studies 1 and 2 (NWTS-1 & 2). , 1980, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  David R. Cox The analysis of binary data , 1970 .

[5]  G. Draper,et al.  Natural History and Treatment of Wilms's Tumour: An Analysis of 335 Cases Occurring in England and Wales 1962-6 , 1970, British medical journal.

[6]  B. Jereb Metastases and recurrences in nephroblastoma. , 1973, Acta radiologica: therapy, physics, biology.

[7]  A. J. Brough,et al.  Significance of mediastinal metastatic disease in Wilms' tumor of favorable histology. , 1984, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[8]  L. Leape,et al.  The treatment of Wilms' Tumor: Results of the second national Wilms' Tumor study , 1981, Cancer.

[9]  Maynard W. Shelly,et al.  Predictive Modeling of Multivariable and Multivariate Data , 1974 .

[10]  E. Beckwith,et al.  Histopathology and prognosis of Wilms tumor Results from the first national wilms' tumor study , 1978, Cancer.

[11]  N Breslow,et al.  Prognosis for Wilms' tumor patients with nonmetastatic disease at diagnosis--results of the second National Wilms' Tumor Study. , 1985, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  N. Breslow,et al.  Prognosis in children with Wilms' tumor metastases prior to or following primary treatment Results from the first National Wilms' Tumor Study (NWTS‐1) , 1982, American Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  L. Leape,et al.  The Surgical Treatment of Wilms' Tumor: Results of the National Wilms' Tumor Study , 1978, Annals of surgery.

[14]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .

[15]  L. Leape,et al.  The treatment of Wilms' tumor. Results of the national Wilms' tumor study , 1976, Cancer.

[16]  M. Pike,et al.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples. , 1977, British Journal of Cancer.