Different approaches to measure ego-centered social support networks: a meta-analysis

Survey indicators of social networks usually measure a certain function of social networks, for example exchange of social support. Social support is a multidimensional construct. The most comprehensive definition distinguishes among sources of social support (social support networks), supportive acts and appraisal of given support. Generally, two main hypotheses can be given with regard to the role social support plays in quality of life of individuals: that social support is beneficial as such (main effects), or that social support is beneficial at occasions of stressful events (buffer effect). In this paper we are dealing with survey measurement of ego-centered social support networks. Three methods to social network measurement are compared: the name generator method, the role generator method and the event-related approach. In a meta-analysis of several studies done on convenient quota samples the effects of method, type of calculation, response format and limitation of support providers on network composition indicators are studied.

[1]  Daniel W. Russell,et al.  Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. , 1990 .

[2]  Ron Coriell,et al.  Doing Unto Others , 1980 .

[3]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Sourcebook of Social Support and Personality , 1997 .

[4]  N. Lin Social Capital: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[5]  Anuska Ferligoj,et al.  Effects on reliability and validity of egocentered network measurements , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[6]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Social support: An interactional view. , 1990 .

[7]  Chang-Hyun Jin Social Capital Index , 2015 .

[8]  T. Wills,et al.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  A. Vaux Social Support: Theory, Research, and Intervention , 1988 .

[10]  R. Burt,et al.  Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction , 1983 .

[11]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Collecting ego-centred network data via the web , 2004, Advances in Methodology and Statistics.

[12]  B. Burleson,et al.  Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community. , 1997 .

[13]  T. Snijders,et al.  Proposals for the measurement of social capital , 2004 .

[14]  V. Hlebec,et al.  Stability of typologies produced on the basis of repeated measurement with the role relationship and the name generator approach , 2009, Advances in Methodology and Statistics.

[15]  V. Hlebec How (not) to Measure Social Support Networks: The Name Generator vs. the Role Relation Approach , 2011 .

[16]  Anuška Ferligoj,et al.  The quality of measurement of personal support subnetworks , 2005 .

[17]  Tzung-Pei Hong,et al.  Social Network Mining, Analysis and Research Trends: Techniques and Applications , 2011 .

[18]  R. Weiss The provisions of social relationships , 1974 .

[19]  G. Keinan Social Support, Stress, and Personality , 1997 .

[20]  V. Hlebec,et al.  Assessing social support networks in cross-national comparative surveys: Measurement issues , 2012 .

[21]  P. Thoits Social support functions and network structures: A supplemental view. , 1992 .

[22]  S. Hobfoll Limitations of Social Support in the Stress Process , 1985 .

[23]  B. Israel,et al.  Social networks and social support. , 2008 .

[24]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Traditional views of social support and their impact on assessment. , 1990 .

[25]  M. Poel,et al.  Personal Networks: A rational-choice explanation of their size and composition , 1993 .

[26]  Valentina Hlebec,et al.  "Please name the first two people you would ask for help" , 2010, Advances in Methodology and Statistics.

[27]  V. Hlebec,et al.  Hypothetical versus actual support providers in comparative network research , 2005, Advances in Methodology and Statistics.

[28]  P. Thoits Social Support and Psychological Well-Being: Theoretical Possibilities , 1985 .

[29]  V. Hlebec,et al.  Social support network and received support at stressful events , 2009, Advances in Methodology and Statistics.

[30]  Anuška Ferligoj,et al.  Merjenje egocentričnih omrežij socialne opore , 2003 .

[31]  Beate Völker,et al.  Creation and Returns of Social Capital , 2003 .

[32]  T. Snijders,et al.  Proposals for the measurement of individual social capital , 2003 .

[33]  H. Veiel,et al.  The meaning and measurement of social support , 1992 .

[34]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Social support : theory, research and applications , 1985 .

[35]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  A Procedure for Surveying Personal Networks , 1978 .

[36]  Anuska Ferligoj,et al.  Estimating the reliability and validity of personal support measures: full information ML estimation with planned incomplete data , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[37]  I. Sarason,et al.  Social Support: Global and Relationship-Based Levels of Analysis , 1994 .

[38]  H. Veiel,et al.  The Meaning And Measurement Of Support , 2014 .

[39]  Valentina Hlebec,et al.  The Comparability of Event-Related and General Social Support , 2012, SNA-KDD 2012.

[40]  Tina Kogovöek,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Measuring Social Support Networks by Web and Telephone , 2006 .

[41]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Multiple classification analysis , 1967 .

[42]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  The social support networks of internet users , 2006, New Media Soc..