Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Outcomes: Does Treatment at a High-Volume Center Confer Survival Benefit?

Objective To determine whether treatment of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) at a high-volume facility affects survival. Study Design Retrospective database analysis. Setting National Cancer Database (2004-2014). Subjects and Methods The National Cancer Database was queried for sinonasal SCC from 2004 to 2014. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and classification, resection margins, treatment regimen, and facility case-specific volume—averaged per year and grouped in tertiles as low (0%-33%), medium (34%-66%), and high (67%-100%)—were compared. Overall survival was compared with Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results A total of 3835 patients treated for sinonasal SCC between 2004 and 2014 were identified. Therapeutic options included surgery alone (18.6%), radiotherapy (RT) alone (29.1%), definitive chemoradiation (15.4%), surgery with adjuvant RT (22.8%), and combinations (14.1%) of the aforementioned treatments. Patients who underwent surgery with adjuvant RT had better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; P < .001; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86). As for treatment volume per facility, 7.4% of patients were treated at a low-volume center, 17.5% at a medium-volume center, and 75.1% at a high-volume center. Univariate analysis showed that treatment at a high-volume facility conferred a significantly better overall survival (HR, 0.77; P = .002). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex, tumor classification, and treatment regimen, demonstrated that patients who underwent treatment at a high-volume facility (HR, 0.81; P < .001) had significantly improved survival. Conclusion This study shows a better overall survival for sinonasal SCC treated at high-volume centers. Further study may be needed to understand the effect of case volume on the paradigms of sinonasal SCC management.

[1]  J. Eloy,et al.  Endoscopic Versus Open Resection of Non‐Squamous Cell Carcinoma Sinonasal Malignancies , 2020, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  B. Judson,et al.  Margins in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Predictors, Outcomes, and the Endoscopic Approach , 2019, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  B. Judson,et al.  Positive margin rates and predictors in transoral robotic surgery after federal approval: A national quality study , 2019, Head & neck.

[4]  B. Judson,et al.  Radiation therapy treatment facility and overall survival in the adjuvant setting for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma , 2019, Cancer.

[5]  J. Eloy,et al.  Comparison of endoscopic and open resection of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score–matched analysis of 652 patients , 2018, International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology.

[6]  M. Luu,et al.  Treatment at high‐volume facilities and academic centers is independently associated with improved survival in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer , 2017, Cancer.

[7]  J. Lewis Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review with Emphasis on Emerging Histologic Subtypes and the Role of Human Papillomavirus , 2016, Head and Neck Pathology.

[8]  S. Siesling,et al.  Impact of hospital volume on breast cancer outcome: a population-based study in the Netherlands , 2014, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[9]  J. Turner,et al.  Incidence and survival in patients with sinonasal cancer: A historical analysis of population‐based data , 2012, Head & neck.

[10]  Ewout F. W. Courrech Staal,et al.  Outcome of Low-Volume Surgery for Esophageal Cancer in a High-Volume Referral Center , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  L. Koniaris,et al.  Impact of Hospital Volume on Surgical Outcome for Head and Neck Cancer , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  Alain C Enthoven,et al.  Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. 1979. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  C. Begg,et al.  The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  C. Begg,et al.  impact of Hospital Volume on Operative Mortality for Major Cancer Surgery , 1999 .