Aerodynamic sensitivity coefficients using the three-dimensional full potential equation

The quasianalytical (QA) approach is applied to the three-dimensional full potential equation to compute wing aerodynamic sensitivity coefficients in the transonic regime. Symbolic manipulation is used and is crucial in reducing the effort associated with obtaining sensitivity equations, and the large sensitivity system is solved using sparse solver routines such as the iterative conjugate gradient method. The results obtained are almost identical to those obtained by the finite difference (FD) approach and indicate that obtaining the sensitivity derivatives using the QA approach is more efficient than computing the derivatives by the FD method, especially as the number of design variables increases. It is concluded that the QA method is an efficient and accurate approach for obtaining transonic aerodynamic sensitivity coefficients in three dimensions.

[1]  Y. Saad,et al.  GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems , 1986 .

[2]  P. M. deZeeuw,et al.  Multigrid and conjugate gradient methods as convergence acceleration techniques , 1985 .

[3]  Jerry C. South,et al.  Vector processor algorithms for transonic flow calculations , 1980 .

[4]  George S. Dulikravich,et al.  Aerodynamic shape design and optimization , 1991 .

[5]  H. Elbanna,et al.  Determination of aerodynamic sensitivity coefficients based on the three-dimensional full potential equation , 1992 .

[6]  Gene Hou,et al.  Approximate analysis and sensitivity analysis methods for viscous flow involving variation of geometric shape , 1991 .

[7]  Oktay Baysal,et al.  Aerodynamic design optimization using sensitivity analysis and computational fluid dynamics , 1991 .

[8]  G. Burgreen,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using Sensitivity Analysis on Third-Order Euler Equations , 1993 .

[9]  Oktay Baysal,et al.  Preconditioned domain decomposition scheme for three-dimensional aerodynamic sensitivity analysis , 1994 .

[10]  Patrick J. Roache,et al.  Symbolic manipulation and computational fluid dynamics , 1983 .

[11]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  A combined direct/inverse three-dimensional transonic wing design method for vector computers , 1984 .

[12]  H. Elbanna,et al.  Determination of aerodynamic sensitivity coefficients based on the transonic small perturbation formulation , 1990 .

[15]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  The case for aerodynamic sensitivity analysis , 1987 .