Quantum erasure with causally disconnected choice

The counterintuitive features of quantum physics challenge many common-sense assumptions. In an interferometric quantum eraser experiment, one can actively choose whether or not to erase which-path information (a particle feature) of one quantum system and thus observe its wave feature via interference or not by performing a suitable measurement on a distant quantum system entangled with it. In all experiments performed to date, this choice took place either in the past or, in some delayed-choice arrangements, in the future of the interference. Thus, in principle, physical communications between choice and interference were not excluded. Here, we report a quantum eraser experiment in which, by enforcing Einstein locality, no such communication is possible. This is achieved by independent active choices, which are space-like separated from the interference. Our setup employs hybrid path-polarization entangled photon pairs, which are distributed over an optical fiber link of 55 m in one experiment, or over a free-space link of 144 km in another. No naive realistic picture is compatible with our results because whether a quantum could be seen as showing particle- or wave-like behavior would depend on a causally disconnected choice. It is therefore suggestive to abandon such pictures altogether.

[1]  Xiao-song Ma.  Nonlocal delayed-choice experiments with entangled photons , 2010 .

[2]  Gregor Weihs,et al.  Happy centenary, photon , 2005, Nature.

[3]  E. Schrödinger.  Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[4]  K. Weizsäcker.  Ortsbestimmung eines Elektrons durch ein Mikroskop , 1931 .

[5]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions , 1998, quant-ph/9810080.

[6]  Berthold-Georg Englert,et al.  Quantitative quantum erasure , 2000 .

[7]  Johannes Kofler,et al.  Experimental violation of a Bell inequality with two different degrees of freedom of entangled particle pairs , 2009, 0904.3245.

[8]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[9]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Reply to the "Comment on: Testing the speed of 'spooky action at a distance' " , 2008, 0810.4607.

[10]  Yakir Aharonov,et al.  Time and the Quantum: Erasing the Past and Impacting the Future , 2005, Science.

[11]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Free-Space distribution of entanglement and single photons over 144 km , 2006, quant-ph/0607182.

[12]  Guang-Can Guo,et al.  Realization of quantum Wheeler's delayed-choice experiment , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[13]  Charles L. Harper,et al.  Science and ultimate reality : quantum theory, cosmology, and complexity , 2004 .

[14]  J. Bell,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics , 1988 .

[15]  Niels Bohr,et al.  Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics , 1996 .

[16]  Wineland,et al.  Young's interference experiment with light scattered from two atoms. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[17]  Rupert Ursin,et al.  Experimental delayed-choice entanglement swapping , 2012 .

[18]  Rupert Ursin,et al.  High-fidelity transmission of entanglement over a high-loss free-space channel , 2009, 0902.2015.

[19]  Asher Peres.  Delayed choice for entanglement swapping , 2000 .

[20]  Peter Mittelstaedt,et al.  Unsharp particle-wave duality in a photon split-beam experiment , 1987 .

[21]  M. Scully,et al.  Quantum eraser: A proposed photon correlation experiment concerning observation and , 1982 .

[22]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Entanglement-based quantum communication over 144km , 2007 .

[23]  W. Heisenberg.  Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik , 1927 .

[24]  William K. Wootters,et al.  Complementarity in the double-slit experiment: Quantum nonseparability and a quantitative statement of Bohr's principle , 1979 .

[25]  P. Grangier,et al.  Experimental Evidence for a Photon Anticorrelation Effect on a Beam Splitter: A New Light on Single-Photon Interferences , 1986 .

[26]  L. Ballentine.  Quantum mechanics : a modern development , 1998 .

[27]  EXPERIMENTAL PROPOSAL OF SWITCHED "DELAYED-CHOICE" FOR ENTANGLEMENT SWAPPING , 2005 .

[28]  C. F. von Weizsäcker,et al.  Zur Deutung der Quantenmechanik , 1941 .

[29]  J. Baldzuhn,et al.  A wave-particle delayed-choice experiment with a single-photon state , 1989 .

[30]  Walther,et al.  Delayed-choice experiments in quantum interference. , 1987, Physical review. A, General physics.

[31]  Philippe Grangier,et al.  Experimental Realization of Wheeler's Delayed-Choice Gedanken Experiment , 2006, Science.

[32]  Gregor Weihs,et al.  Experimental nonlocality proof of quantum teleportation and entanglement swapping. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[33]  G. Greenstein.  The quantum challenge , 1997 .

[34]  Rupert Ursin,et al.  Violation of local realism with freedom of choice , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  P. Grangier,et al.  Delayed-choice test of quantum complementarity with interfering single photons. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[36]  B. Englert,et al.  Quantum optical tests of complementarity , 1991, Nature.

[37]  Thomas Coudreau,et al.  Entanglement-Enabled Delayed-Choice Experiment , 2012, Science.

[38]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  A fast and compact quantum random number generator , 1999, quant-ph/9912118.

[39]  B. Englert,et al.  Fringe Visibility and Which-Way Information: An Inequality. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[40]  Shih,et al.  New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[41]  A. Aspect,et al.  A New Light on Single Photon Interferences , 1986 .

[42]  Radu Ionicioiu,et al.  Proposal for a quantum delayed-choice experiment. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[43]  B G Sidharth,et al.  Law without Law , 2007, 0710.3900.

[44]  J. Bell,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Preface to the first edition , 2004 .

[45]  F. Sciarrino,et al.  Delayed-choice entanglement swapping with vacuum–one-photon quantum states , 2002, quant-ph/0201019.

[46]  John F. Clauser,et al.  Experimental distinction between the quantum and classical field - theoretic predictions for the pho , 1973 .

[47]  Sandu Popescu,et al.  A Quantum Delayed-Choice Experiment , 2012, Science.

[48]  Shih,et al.  Delayed "Choice" quantum eraser , 1999, Physical review letters.

[49]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[50]  A. Zeilinger.  Experiment and the Foundations of Quantum Physics , 1999 .

[51]  J. Baudon,et al.  Delayed choices in atom Stern-Gerlach interferometry. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[52]  S. P. Walborn,et al.  Double-slit quantum eraser , 2001, quant-ph/0106078.

[53]  Daniel M. Greenberger,et al.  Simultaneous wave and particle knowledge in a neutron interferometer , 1988 .

[54]  John Archibald Wheeler,et al.  The “Past” and the “Delayed-Choice” Double-Slit Experiment , 1978 .