An Examination of Prototyping and Design Outcome

The building of prototypes is an important part of the product design and development process. This paper examines factors in prototyping, including part count and time spent on design and fabrication activity, and their correlations with design outcome. The research questions asked: Do simpler prototypes mean a more successful design? Does more prototyping lead to better designs? Does the amount of time spent on a project, both overall and on different activities over a project cycle, relate to design success? One of the main findings of this study is that prototypes with fewer parts correlate with better design outcome, as do prototypes that have fewer parts added to them over the course of development. This paper also finds that committing more time to a project is not necessarily associated with a successful design outcome.Copyright © 2004 by ASME

[1]  Michael Schrage,et al.  Serious Play: How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate , 1999 .

[2]  Scott Kiefer,et al.  A case study of prototyping methods and design for manufacture: electrostatic window blinds , 2004 .

[3]  Imre Horváth,et al.  Testing shape manipulation tools using abstract prototypes , 1998 .

[4]  V. Goel.  Sketches of thought , 1995 .

[5]  David G. Ullman,et al.  The information requests of mechanical design engineers , 1991 .

[6]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[7]  Reinhard Budde,et al.  Prototyping: An Approach to Evolutionary System Development , 1992, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[8]  Henry Petroski,et al.  Invention by design: how engineers get from thought to thing , 1996 .

[9]  Larry Leifer,et al.  210-NP: measuring the mechanical engineering design process , 1996, Technology-Based Re-Engineering Engineering Education Proceedings of Frontiers in Education FIE'96 26th Annual Conference.

[10]  David Craig,et al.  The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process , 1990, Comput. Graph..

[11]  Charles Hill,et al.  What do Prototypes Prototype , 1997 .

[12]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Concept Generation and Sketching: Correlations With Design Outcome , 2003 .

[13]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Powers of observation in creative design , 1996 .

[14]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis , 1997 .

[15]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .