Is the semantic category effect in the lateral temporal cortex due to motion property differences?

Two specific areas within the posterior lateral temporal cortex (PLTC), the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) and the posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG), have been proposed to store different types of conceptual properties of motion: the pSTS encodes knowledge of articulated, biological motion, and the pMTG encodes knowledge about unarticulated, mechanical motion. We examined this hypothesis by comparing activation patterns evoked by verbs denoting biological motion (e.g., walk), mechanical motion (e.g., rotate), and low-motion events (e.g., ferment). Classical noun categories with different motion types (animals, tools, and buildings) were also tested and compared with previous findings of the categorical effects in PLTC. Replicating previous findings of different types of nouns, we observed stronger activation for animals than tools in the pSTS and stronger activation for tools compared to other types of nouns in the pMTG. However, such motion-type specific activation patterns only partly extended to verbs. Whereas the pSTS showed preferences for biological-motion verbs, no region within the pMTG was sensitive to verbs denoting mechanical motion. We speculate that the pMTG preference for tools is driven by properties other than mechanical motion, such as strong mappings between the visual form and motor-related representations.

[1]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  J. Gee,et al.  Neural representation of verb meaning: An fMRI study , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  Automatic Priming of Semantically Related Words Reduces Activity in the Fusiform Gyrus , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Yanchao Bi,et al.  Motor knowledge is one dimension for concept organization: Further evidence from a Chinese semantic dementia case , 2011, Brain and Language.

[5]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Action-Related Properties Shape Object Representations in the Ventral Stream , 2007, Neuron.

[6]  M. Wallace,et al.  Visual Localization Ability Influences Cross-Modal Bias , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Action-related properties of objects shape object representations in the ventral stream , 2007 .

[8]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Superior Temporal SulcusIt's My Area: Or Is It? , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  B. Argall,et al.  Integration of Auditory and Visual Information about Objects in Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2004, Neuron.

[10]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge , 1996, Nature.

[11]  Aina Puce,et al.  Configural Processing of Biological Motion in Human Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Haxby,et al.  Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  M Besson,et al.  The Snodgrass and Vanderwart Set Revisited: Norms for Object Manipulability and for Pictorial Ambiguity of Objects, Chimeric Objects, and Nonobjects , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[14]  A. Damasioa,et al.  Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval , 2004 .

[15]  Alex Martin,et al.  Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  C. Price,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Semantic System: Divisible by What? , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  D. Perani,et al.  The Effects of Semantic Category and Knowledge Type on Lexical-Semantic Access: A PET Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[18]  C. Price The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging , 2000, Journal of anatomy.

[19]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[20]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  Why and how to study Theory of Mind with fMRI , 2006, Brain Research.

[21]  Alex Martin,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging of Semantic Memory , 2001 .

[22]  E. Tulving,et al.  Organization of memory. , 1973 .

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Action selectivity in parietal and temporal cortex. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[25]  T. Talavage,et al.  Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: Evidence from fMRI , 2008, Brain and Language.

[26]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Concepts Are More than Percepts: The Case of Action Verbs , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  C. Frith,et al.  Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  E. Bullmore,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or ‘representational momentum’ , 2000, Current Biology.

[29]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Domain specificity in visual cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  J. Haxby,et al.  Parallel Visual Motion Processing Streams for Manipulable Objects and Human Movements , 2002, Neuron.

[31]  R. Adolphs,et al.  NEURAL CORRELATES OF CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE FOR ACTIONS , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[32]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval , 2004, Cognition.

[33]  Uta Noppeney,et al.  Can segregation within the semantic system account for category-specific deficits? , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  R. Rosenthal Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[35]  J. Haxby,et al.  fMRI Responses to Video and Point-Light Displays of Moving Humans and Manipulable Objects , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 2002, Neuron.

[37]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[38]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Activation in Human MT/MST by Static Images with Implied Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  P. Sinha,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  E. Tulving,et al.  Episodic and semantic memory , 1972 .

[41]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[42]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Discrete Cortical Regions Associated with Knowledge of Color and Knowledge of Action , 1995, Science.

[43]  B. Bertenthal,et al.  Does Perception of Biological Motion Rely on Specific Brain Regions? , 2001, NeuroImage.

[44]  M. Brett,et al.  Actions Speak Louder Than Functions: The Importance of Manipulability and Action in Tool Representation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  Lorraine K. Tyler,et al.  Objects and their actions: evidence for a neurally distributed semantic system , 2003, NeuroImage.

[46]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Distinct Cortical Pathways for Processing Tool versus Animal Sounds , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Murray Grossman,et al.  The Neural Basis for Category-Specific Knowledge: An fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[48]  Pasquale A. Della Rosa,et al.  The impact of semantic reference on word class: An fMRI study of action and object naming , 2006, NeuroImage.

[49]  Howard J. Rosen,et al.  The Anatomy of Category-specific Object Naming in Neurodegenerative Diseases , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  Guido Gainotti,et al.  What the Locus of Brain Lesion Tells us About the Nature of the Cognitive Defect Underlying Category-Specific Disorders: A Review , 2000, Cortex.

[51]  Alex Martin,et al.  NEURAL FOUNDATIONS FOR UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL AND MECHANICAL CONCEPTS , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[52]  E. Vatikiotis-Bateson,et al.  Perceiving Biological Motion: Dissociating Visible Speech from Walking , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Neuroanatomically separable effects of imageability and grammatical class during single-word comprehension , 2006, Brain and Language.

[54]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[56]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Conceptual Representations of Action in the Lateral Temporal Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[57]  Stefano F. Cappa,et al.  Word and picture matching: a PET study of semantic category effects , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[58]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition , 2001 .

[59]  T. Shallice,et al.  Naming manipulable objects: Anatomy of a category specific effect in left temporal tumours , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[60]  J. Hodges,et al.  Generating ‘tiger’ as an animal name or a word beginning with T: differences in brain activation , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[62]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  J. Zacks Neuroimaging Studies of Mental Rotation: A Meta-analysis and Review , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Anatomic Constraints on Cognitive Theories of Category Specificity , 2002, NeuroImage.