Imaging high stage river‐water intrusion into a contaminated aquifer along a major river corridor using 2‐D time‐lapse surface electrical resistivity tomography

The Hanford 300 Area is located adjacent to the Columbia River in south-central Washington State, USA, and was a former site for nuclear fuel processing operations. Waste disposal practices resulted in persistent unsaturated zone and groundwater contamination, the primary contaminant of concern being uranium. Uranium behavior at the site is intimately linked with river stage driven groundwater-river water exchange such that understanding the nature of river water intrusion into the 300 Area is critical for predicting uranium desorption and transport. In this paper we use time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) to image the inland intrusion of river during high stage conditions. We demonstrate a modified time-lapse inversion approach, whereby the transient water table elevation is explicitly modeled by removing regularization constraints across the water table boundary. This implementation was critical for producing meaningful imaging results. We inverted approximately 1200 data sets (400 per line over 3 lines) using high performance computing resources to produce a time-lapse sequence of changes in bulk conductivity caused by river water intrusion during the 2011 spring runoff cycle over approximately 125 days. The resulting time series for each mesh element was then analyzed using common time series analysis to reveal the timing and location ofmore » river water intrusion beneath each line. The results reveal non-uniform flows characterized by preferred flow zones where river water enters and exits quickly with stage increase and decrease, and low permeability zones with broader bulk conductivity ‘break through’ curves and longer river water residence times. The time-lapse ERT inversion approach removes the deleterious effects of changing water table elevation and enables remote and spatial continuous groundwater-river water exchange monitoring using surface based ERT arrays under conditions where groundwater and river water conductivity are in contrast.« less

[1]  L. Bentley,et al.  Simultaneous time-lapse electrical resistivity inversion , 2011 .

[2]  E. C. Thomas,et al.  Electrical Conductivities in Shaly Sands-I. The Relation Between Hydrocarbon Saturation and Resistivity Index; II. The Temperature Coefficient Of Electrical Conductivity , 1974 .

[3]  G. Backus,et al.  Numerical Applications of a Formalism for Geophysical Inverse Problems , 1967 .

[4]  Mary J. Hartman,et al.  Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring for Fiscal Year 2005 , 2006 .

[5]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Hydrologic and geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange during base flow recession in a headwater mountain stream , 2012 .

[6]  Douglas LaBrecque,et al.  Difference Inversion of ERT Data: a Fast Inversion Method for 3-D In Situ Monitoring , 2001 .

[7]  T. Günther,et al.  A filtering method to correct time-lapse 3D ERT data and improve imaging of natural aquifer dynamics , 2012 .

[8]  Kamini Singha,et al.  Characterizing hyporheic transport processes — Interpretation of electrical geophysical data in coupled stream–hyporheic zone systems during solute tracer studies , 2010 .

[9]  James P. McNamara,et al.  Application of time-lapse ERT imaging to watershed characterization , 2008 .

[10]  J. Nitao,et al.  Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement , 1992 .

[11]  C. Zheng,et al.  Multi-Scale Mass Transfer Processes Controlling Natural Attenuation and Engineered Remediation: An IFRC Focused on Hanford’s 300 Area Uranium Plume , 2007 .

[12]  Kamini Singha,et al.  Electrical characterization of non‐Fickian transport in groundwater and hyporheic systems , 2008 .

[13]  Andrew Binley,et al.  Synthetic and field-based electrical imaging of a zerovalent iron barrier: Implications for monitoring long-term barrier performance , 2006 .

[14]  Frederick D. Day-Lewis,et al.  Monitoring groundwater‐surface water interaction using time‐series and time‐frequency analysis of transient three‐dimensional electrical resistivity changes , 2012 .

[15]  Niklas Linde,et al.  3D crosshole ERT for aquifer characterization and monitoring of infiltrating river water , 2011 .

[16]  Saskia M. van Manen,et al.  Ground temperature profiles and thermal rock properties at Wairakei, New Zealand , 2012 .

[17]  Kamini Singha,et al.  Effects of spatially variable resolution on field-scale estimates of tracer concentration from electrical inversions using Archie’s law , 2006 .

[18]  A. Binley,et al.  Improved hydrogeophysical characterization using joint inversion of cross‐hole electrical resistance and ground‐penetrating radar traveltime data , 2006 .

[19]  A. Binley,et al.  Cross-hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection , 2000 .

[20]  A. Ward,et al.  Use of electrical imaging and distributed temperature sensing methods to characterize surface water–groundwater exchange regulating uranium transport at the Hanford 300 Area, Washington , 2010 .

[21]  Boris Gurevich,et al.  Influence of microheterogeneity on effective stress law for elastic properties of rocks , 2008 .

[22]  Niklas Linde,et al.  The borehole-fluid effect in electrical resistivity imaging , 2010 .

[23]  D. P. Mendoza,et al.  Investigation of the Hyporheic Zone at the 300 Area,Hanford Site , 2007 .

[24]  L. Slater,et al.  Improved Resistivity Imaging of Targets with Sharp Boundaries Using an Iterative Disconnect Procedure , 2012 .

[25]  Christopher F. Brown,et al.  Limited Field Investigation Report for Uranium Contamination in the 300 Area, 300-FF-5 Operable Unit, Hanford Site, Washington , 2007 .

[26]  Andreas Kemna,et al.  Time-lapse three-dimensional inversion of complex conductivity data using an active time constrained (ATC) approach , 2011 .

[27]  R. Parker,et al.  Occam's inversion; a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data , 1987 .

[28]  J. Zachara,et al.  Multispecies diffusion models: A study of uranyl species diffusion , 2011 .

[29]  J. G. Kim,et al.  4-D inversion of DC resistivity monitoring data acquired over a dynamically changing earth model , 2009 .

[30]  L. Toran,et al.  Stream Bottom Resistivity Tomography to Map Ground Water Discharge , 2008, Ground water.

[31]  J. Zachara,et al.  River‐Induced Flow Dynamics in Long‐Screen Wells and Impact on Aqueous Samples , 2011, Ground water.

[32]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models , 2002 .

[33]  W. Daily,et al.  The effects of noise on Occam's inversion of resistivity tomography data , 1996 .

[34]  C. Zheng,et al.  Multi-Scale Mass Transfer Processes Controlling Natural Attenuation and Engineered Remediation: An IFRC Focused on Hanford’s 300 Area Uranium Plume January 2011 to January 2012 , 2012 .

[35]  Roelof Versteeg,et al.  Improved hydrogeophysical characterization and monitoring through parallel modeling and inversion of time-domain resistivity andinduced-polarization data , 2010 .

[36]  M. Cardenas,et al.  Water table dynamics and groundwater–surface water interaction during filling and draining of a large fluvial island due to dam‐induced river stage fluctuations , 2010 .