Polystyrene foams. III. Structure-tensile properties relationships

In the previous two parts of this series of articles, the relations among the foaming conditions, micro- structure, and impact properties of expanded microcellular polystyrene (EPS) were discussed. In this article, the effects of the foaming conditions and structure on the tensile prop- erties of EPS were investigated. A systematic investigation was performed based on a statistical experimental design. Various processing conditions were used and a wide range of cellular structures was developed. Regression analysis was conducted on the data and expressions were developed to quantify the relationship between the tensile properties and the cellular structure. Foaming time and foaming temper- ature were the most important processing parameters influ- encing the tensile modulus and strength. The tensile modu- lus and strength increased with an increasing foam density, but they decreased slightly when the cell size increased. Two different approaches were used to develop models relating the modulus to the foam density of EPS. Both models fitted the experimental data quite well. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 1427-1434, 2003

[1]  R. Skochdopole,et al.  Physical Property Modifications of Low-Density Polyethylene Foams , 1965 .

[2]  R. Bradt,et al.  Cell size effects on the strength of foamed glass , 1981 .

[3]  Saeed Doroudiani,et al.  Polystyrene foams. II. Structure–impact properties relationships , 2003 .

[4]  T. Manley.  Plastics materials 5th edn: J. A. Brydson Butterworths, Guildford, 1989 xiv + 839 pages, £57.50 ISBN 0-408-00721-4 , 1989 .

[5]  F. Ramsteiner,et al.  Testing the deformation behaviour of polymer foams , 2001 .

[6]  N. C. Hilyard,et al.  Low density cellular plastics , 1994 .

[7]  J. C. H. Affdl,et al.  The Halpin-Tsai Equations: A Review , 1976 .

[8]  W. E. Warren,et al.  The Nonlinear Elastic Behavior of Open-Cell Foams , 1991 .

[9]  D. J. Green,et al.  The effect of cell size on the mechanical behavior of cellular materials , 1990 .

[10]  B. Mehta,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Foamed Thermoplastics , 1976 .

[11]  M. B. Rhodes,et al.  Mechanical properties of particulate‐filled polyurethane foams , 1978 .

[12]  R. Landel,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites , 1993 .

[13]  Jong-Shin Huang,et al.  Fatigue of cellular materials , 1996 .

[14]  D. J. Green,et al.  Compressive behavior and deformation-mode map of an open cell alumina , 1990 .

[15]  M. Ashby,et al.  Cellular solids: Structure & properties , 1988 .

[16]  N. C. Hilyard,et al.  Mechanics of cellular plastics , 1982 .

[17]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  Processing of microcellular polyester composites , 1985 .

[18]  Saeed Doroudiani,et al.  Polystyrene foams. I. Processing‐structure relationships , 2003 .

[19]  M. Ashby,et al.  The mechanics of three-dimensional cellular materials , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[20]  J. E. Mark,et al.  Microcellular foams from polyethersulfone and polyphenylsulfone. Preparation and mechanical properties , 2002 .

[21]  D. J. Green,et al.  Elastic behavior of open-cell alumina , 1987 .

[22]  J. M. Lederman.  The prediction of the tensile properties of flexible foams , 1971 .

[23]  Richard M. Christensen,et al.  Mechanics of low density materials , 1986 .

[24]  A. Mcintyre,et al.  Fracture properties of a rigid polyurethane foam over a range of densities , 1979 .