Intensity-invariance of fine time structure in basilar-membrane click responses: implications for cochlear mechanics.

Basilar-membrane and auditory-nerve responses to impulsive acoustic stimuli, whether measured directly in response to clicks or obtained indirectly using cross- or reverse-correlation and/or Fourier analysis, manifest a striking symmetry: near-invariance with stimulus intensity of the fine time structure of the response over almost the entire dynamic range of hearing. This paper explores the origin and implications of this symmetry for cochlear mechanics. Intensity-invariance is investigated by applying the EQ-NL theorem [de Boer, Aud. Neurosci. 3, 377-388 (1997)] to define a family of linear cochlear models in which the strength of the active force generators is controlled by a real-valued, intensity-dependent parameter, gamma (with 0 < or = gamma < or = 1). The invariance of fine time structure is conjectured to imply that as gamma is varied the poles of the admittance of the cochlear partition remain within relatively narrow bands of the complex plane oriented perpendicular to the real frequency axis. Physically, the conjecture implies that the local resonant frequencies of the cochlear partition are nearly independent of intensity. Cochlear-model responses, computed by extending the model obtained by solution of the inverse problem in squirrel monkey at low sound levels [Zweig, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 1229-1254 (1991)] with three different forms of the intensity dependence of the partition admittance, support the conjecture. Intensity-invariance of cochlear resonant frequencies is shown to be consistent with the well-known "half-octave shift," describing the shift with intensity in the peak (or best) frequency of the basilar-membrane frequency response. Shifts in best frequency do not arise locally, via changes in the underlying resonant frequencies of the partition, but globally through the intensity dependence of the driving pressure. Near-invariance of fine time structure places strong constraints on the mechanical effects of force generation by outer hair cells. In particular, the symmetry requires that the feedback forces generated by outer hair cells (OHCs) not significantly affect the natural resonant frequencies of the cochlear partition. These results contradict many, if not most, cochlear models, in which OHC forces produce significant changes in the reactance and resonant frequencies of the partition.

[1]  L. Carney Temporal response properties of neurons in the auditory pathway , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[2]  C. Shera,et al.  Frequency glides in click responses of the basilar membrane and auditory nerve: their scaling behavior and origin in traveling-wave dispersion. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  E de Boer,et al.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. I. Frequency modulations ("glides") in impulse responses and cross-correlation functions. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  P Dallos,et al.  Somatic stiffness of cochlear outer hair cells is voltage-dependent. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  F. Mammano,et al.  Biophysics of the cochlea: linear approximation. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  A. Hubbard,et al.  A traveling-wave amplifier model of the cochlea. , 1993, Science.

[7]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Study of mechanical motions in the basal region of the chinchilla cochlea. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  M. Sondhi,et al.  Method for computing motion in a two-dimensional cochlear model. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J. Guinan,et al.  Auditory-nerve-fiber responses to high-level clicks: interference patterns indicate that excitation is due to the combination of multiple drives. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  T J Goblick,et al.  Time-domain measurements of cochlear nonlinearities using combination click stimuli. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Peter Dallos,et al.  Properties of Voltage-Dependent Somatic Stiffness of Cochlear Outer Hair Cells , 2000, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[12]  E. de Boer,et al.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. III. Intensity effects. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  C. Daniel Geisler A cochlear model using feedback from motile outer hair cells , 1991, Hearing Research.

[14]  J. Pierce,et al.  The cochlear compromise. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Egbert de Boer THE INVERSE PROBLEM SOLVED FOR A THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL OF THE COCHLEA.II: APPLICATION TO EXPERIMENTAL DATA SETS , 1995 .

[16]  Anthony W. Gummer,et al.  Basilar membrane motion in the pigeon measured with the Mössbauer technique , 1987, Hearing Research.

[17]  J. I. Matsui,et al.  Characterization of Damage and Regeneration in Cultured Avian Utricles , 2000, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[18]  A. J. Hudspeth,et al.  Compliance of the hair bundle associated with gating of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in the Bullfrog's saccular hair cell , 1988, Neuron.

[19]  E de Boer,et al.  The "inverse problem" solved for a three-dimensional model of the cochlea. III. Brushing-up the solution method. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  M. Ruggero,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to clicks at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  A. Møller,et al.  Frequency selectivity of single auditory-nerve fibers in response to broadband noise stimuli. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  C D Geisler,et al.  Transient response of the basilar membrane measured in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer effect. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  G. Zweig,et al.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  M. Liberman,et al.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  W. S. Rhode Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  G. Zweig,et al.  Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  D. Brass A macro-mechanical model of the guinea pig cochlea with realistic parameters. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  L. Carney,et al.  Temporal coding of resonances by low-frequency auditory nerve fibers: single-fiber responses and a population model. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Paul J Kolston The importance of phase data and model dimensionality to cochlear mechanics , 2000, Hearing Research.

[31]  L. Carney,et al.  Frequency glides in the impulse responses of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1999 .

[32]  H. W. Bode,et al.  Network analysis and feedback amplifier design , 1945 .

[33]  Geisler Cd,et al.  A cochlear model using feedback from motile outer hair cells , 1991 .

[34]  Egbert de Boer The ‘‘inverse problem’’ solved for a three‐dimensional model of the cochlea. I. Analysis , 1995 .

[35]  N. Kiang,et al.  Tails of tuning curves of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  M A Viergever,et al.  What type of force does the cochlear amplifier produce? , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Basilar membrane responses to broadband stimuli. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.