Effectiveness of RoboLeader for Dynamic Re-Tasking in an Urban Environment

RoboLeader is an intelligent agent that has the capabilities of coordinating a team of ground robots and revising route plans for the robots based on battlefield intelligence. Specifically, RoboLeader can support dynamic re-tasking based on battlefield developments as well as coordination between aerial and ground robots in pursuit of moving targets. In the current study, we manipulated the level of automation for RoboLeader as well as the presence of a visualization tool (which informed the participants about their target entrapment performance) in the RoboLeader user interface. Results showed that RoboLeader (Fully Automated condition) was more effective in encapsulating the moving targets than were the human operators (when they were either without assistance from RoboLeader or when they were partially assisted by RoboLeader). Participants successfully encapsulated the moving targets only 63% of the time in the Manual condition but 89% of the time when they were assisted by RoboLeader. Those participants who play video games frequently demonstrated significantly better encapsulation performance than did infrequent gamers; they also had better situation awareness of the mission environment. Visualization had little effect on participants’ performance. Finally, participants reported significantly higher workload when they were in the Manual condition than when they were assisted by RoboLeader.

[1]  J Y C Chen,et al.  Effects of tactile cueing on concurrent performance of military and robotics tasks in a simulated multitasking environment , 2008, Ergonomics.

[2]  Johnny E. Triplett The Effects of Commercial Video Game Playing: A Comparison of Skills and Abilities for the Predator UAV , 2012 .

[3]  Lindsey K. McIntire,et al.  Operator Selection for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Operators: A Comparison of Video Game Players and Manned Aircraft Pilots , 2009 .

[4]  Michael Lewis,et al.  Assessing cooperation in human control of heterogeneous robots , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[5]  Prasanna Velagapudi,et al.  How search and its subtasks scale in N robots , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  D. Derryberry,et al.  Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. , 2002, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Supervisory Control of Robots Using RoboLeader , 2010 .

[8]  L. Gugerty,et al.  Reference-frame misalignment and cardinal direction judgments: group differences and strategies. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[9]  Zhihua Qu,et al.  RoboLeader: Dynamic Re-Tasking for Persistence Surveillance in an Urban Environment Using Robot-to-Robot Control , 2011 .

[10]  John D. Lee,et al.  Human-Automation Collaboration in Dynamic Mission Planning: A Challenge Requiring an Ecological Approach , 2006 .

[11]  Paula J. Durlach,et al.  Human–Robot Interaction in the Context of Simulated Route Reconnaissance Missions , 2008 .

[12]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  Using a robot proxy to create common ground in exploration tasks , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[13]  C. S. Green,et al.  Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: the case of action video game players , 2006, Cognition.

[14]  Carla T. Joyner,et al.  Concurrent Performance of Gunner's and Robotics Operator's Tasks in a Multitasking Environment , 2009 .

[15]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Human Performance Issues and User Interface Design for Teleoperated Robots , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[16]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[17]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Toward human-multiagent teams , 2007 .