Forecasting solar wind structures and shock arrival times using an ensemble of models

[1] Forecasting the time of arrival at Earth of interplanetary shocks following solar metric type II activity is an important first step in the establishment of an operational space weather prediction system. The quality of the forecasts is of utmost importance. The performances of the shock time of arrival (STOA) and interplanetary shock propagation models (ISPM) were previously evaluated by Smith et al. [2000] for 36 solar events. Here we use 173 solar events between February 1997 and October 2000 to set thresholds for the Hakamada–Akasofu–Fry version 2 (HAFv.2) model and then present the results of a comparison of the performance of this model to the STOA and ISPM solar wind models. Each model predicts shock arrival time (SAT) at the Earth using real-time metric type II radio frequency drifts and coincident X-ray and optical data for input and L1 satellite observations for verification. Our evaluation of input parameters to the models showed that the accuracy of the solar metric type II radio burst observations as a measure of the initial shock velocity was compromised for those events at greater than 20° solar longitude from central meridian. The HAF model also calculates the interplanetary shock propagation imbedded in a realistic solar wind structure through which the shocks travel and interact. Standard meteorological forecast metrics are used. A variety of statistical comparisons among the three models show them to be practically equivalent in forecasting SAT. Although the HAF kinematic model performance compares favorably with ISPM and STOA, it appears to be no better at predicting SAT than ISPM or STOA. HAFv.2 takes the inhomogeneous, ambient solar wind structure into account and thereby provides a means of sorting event-driven shock arrivals from corotating interaction region (CIR) passage.

[1]  Murray Dryer,et al.  Interplanetary shock waves generated by solar flares , 1974 .

[2]  J. Virginia Lincoln,et al.  Geomagnetic and solar data , 1966 .

[3]  Xuepu Zhao Interaction of fast steady flow with slow transient flow: A new cause of shock pair and interplanetary Bz event , 1992 .

[4]  M. Dryer,et al.  Dynamical models of coronal transients and interplanetary disturbances , 1984 .

[5]  Syun-Ichi Akasofu Predicting geomagnetic storms as a space weather project , 2002 .

[6]  R. Marsden The sun and the heliosphere in three dimensions : proceedings of the XIXth ESLAB symposium, held in Les Diablerets, Switzerland, 4-6 June 1985 , 1986 .

[7]  M. Dryer Multi-dimensional MHD simulation of solar-generated disturbances - Space weather forecasting of geomagnetic storms , 1997 .

[8]  Z. Smith,et al.  Calibration of the kinematic method of studying solar wind disturbances on the basis of a one-dimensional MHD solution and a simulation study of the heliosphere disturbances between 22 november and 6 december 1977 , 1985 .

[9]  Shea,et al.  Estimating the Arrival Time of Solar-Flare-Initiated Shocks by Considering Them to Be Blast Waves Riding over the Solar Wind , 1986 .

[10]  Kurt W. Weiler,et al.  Radio astronomy at long wavelengths , 2000 .

[11]  N. Gopalswamy,et al.  Interplanetary acceleration of coronal mass ejections , 2000 .

[12]  M. A. Shea,et al.  A simplified model for timing the arrival of solar flare‐initiated shocks , 1985 .

[13]  C. Fry,et al.  A simulation study of distortion of the heliospheric sheet caused by solar activity , 1985 .

[14]  James Chen,et al.  Acceleration of coronal mass ejections , 2002 .

[15]  J. Schaefer The critical success index as an indicator of Warning skill , 1990 .

[16]  K. Hakamada,et al.  Simulation of three-dimensional solar wind disturbances and resulting geomagnetic storms , 1982 .

[17]  M. Dryer,et al.  Numerical simulations of high-speed solar wind streams within 1 AU and their signatures at 1 AU , 1991 .

[18]  C. Fry,et al.  Heliospheric current sheet and its solar cycle variations , 1986 .

[19]  M. Dryer Multidimensional, magnetohydrodynamic simulation of solar-generated disturbances: space weather forecasting of geomagnetic storms. , 1998 .

[20]  M. Dryer,et al.  MHD study of temporal and spatial evolution of simulated interplanetary shocks in the ecliptic plane within 1 AU , 1990 .

[21]  M. Dryer,et al.  Real-time forecasting of ICME shock arrivals at L1 during the "April Fool's Day" epoch: 28 March - 21 April 2001 , 2002 .

[22]  C. Arge,et al.  Improvement in the prediction of solar wind conditions using near‐real time solar magnetic field updates , 2000 .

[23]  M. Dryer,et al.  Evaluation of solar Type II radio burst estimates of initial solar wind shock speed using a kinematic model of the solar wind on the April 2001 solar event swarm , 2002 .

[24]  A. Szabo,et al.  Interplanetary fast shocks and associated drivers observed through the 23rd solar minimum by Wind over its first 2.5 years , 2000 .

[25]  L. Sedov Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics , 1960 .

[26]  W. Murtagh,et al.  Performance of interplanetary shock prediction models: STOA and ISPM , 2000 .

[27]  M. Dryer,et al.  Improvements to the HAF solar wind model for space weather predictions , 2001 .

[28]  S. Akasofu,et al.  Quantitative forecasting of the 27-day recurrent magnetic activity , 1988 .

[29]  J. K. Chao,et al.  A shock surface geometry - The February 15-16, 1967, event. [solar flare associated interplanetary shock] , 1974 .

[30]  M. Heinemann Effects of solar wind inhomogeneities on transit times of interplanetary shock waves , 2002 .

[31]  M. Dryer Interplanetary studies: Propagation of disturbances between the Sun and the magnetosphere , 1994 .