The effects on DNA migration of altering parameters in the comet assay protocol such as agarose density, electrophoresis conditions and durations of the enzyme or the alkaline treatments.

The single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) is a popular method for measuring DNA migration as an estimate of DNA damage. No standardised comet assay protocol exists, which make comparisons between studies complicated. In a previous inter-laboratory validation study of the comet assay, we identified important parameters in the protocol that might affect DNA migration. The aim of this study was to assess how different comet assay protocols affect DNA migration. The results in this study suggest that (i) there is a significant linear dose-response relationship between the agarose gel's density and DNA migration and that damaged cells are more sensitive to the agarose gel's density; (ii) incubation with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase for 10 min is inadequate, whereas 30 min is sufficient; (iii) the typically used 20 min of alkaline treatment might be to short when analysing samples that contain particular alkali-labile sites (ALS) and (iv) the duration of electrophoresis as well as the strength of the electric field applied affects the DNA migration. By using protocol-specific calibration curves, it is possible to reduce the variation in DNA migration caused by differences in comet assay protocols. This does, however, not completely remove the impact of the durations of alkaline treatment and electrophoresis when analysing cells containing ALS that are relatively resistant to high alkaline treatment.

[1]  Steffen Loft,et al.  An ECVAG† trial on assessment of oxidative damage to DNA measured by the comet assay , 2009, Mutagenesis.

[2]  Andrew R Collins,et al.  The use of bacterial repair endonucleases in the comet assay. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[3]  S. Basu,et al.  Down-regulation of oxidative DNA lesions in human mononuclear cells after antioxidant supplementation correlates to increase of gamma-tocopherol. , 2008, International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition.

[4]  David H Phillips,et al.  Variation in the measurement of DNA damage by comet assay measured by the ECVAG inter-laboratory validation trial. , 2010, Mutagenesis.

[5]  Vijayalaxmi,et al.  Assessment of radiation-induced DNA damage in human blood lymphocytes using the single-cell gel electrophoresis technique. , 1992, Mutation research.

[6]  M D Waters,et al.  IPCS guidelines for the monitoring of genotoxic effects of carcinogens in humans. International Programme on Chemical Safety. , 2000, Mutation research.

[7]  R. Tice,et al.  Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing , 2000, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[8]  K. Kohn.  Principles and practice of DNA filter elution. , 1991, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[9]  H. Karlsson,et al.  The comet assay in nanotoxicology research , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[10]  A. Collins,et al.  The comet assay for DNA damage and repair , 2004, Molecular biotechnology.

[11]  Steffen Loft,et al.  Variation in assessment of oxidatively damaged DNA in mononuclear blood cells by the comet assay with visual scoring. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[12]  G Speit,et al.  The influence of temperature during alkaline treatment and electrophoresis on results obtained with the comet assay. , 1999, Toxicology letters.

[13]  G. Speit,et al.  The comet assay: a sensitive genotoxicity test for the detection of DNA damage and repair. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[14]  R R Tice,et al.  Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. 4th International Comet Assay Workshop. , 2003, Mutagenesis.

[15]  B. Epe,et al.  Oxidative DNA damage and mutations induced by a polar photosensitizer, Ro19-8022. , 1999, Mutation research.

[16]  A. Collins,et al.  The comet assay in human biomonitoring: gene-environment interactions. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[17]  P. Olive,et al.  The comet assay: a comprehensive review. , 1995, Mutation research.

[18]  Trevelyan Square,et al.  Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay , 2003 .