Examining state environmental regulatory policy design

Abstract This paper develops a scheme for characterizing variation in the structure of state environmental regulatory policy design. The rules, policy tools and incentives built into regulatory policies affect the manner in which policies are implemented, and, ultimately, the actions of target populations toward the ambient environment. Variation in state concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) regulation is examined as a specific case of subnational regulatory policy design. These operations can have substantial environmental impacts on local communities and large cumulative impacts on waterways. Using a content analysis of CAFO policy across states, the paper shows state policy designs to vary on three dimensions: scope, stringency and prescription. This research calls attention to the use of more detailed measures of environmental policy design rather than unitary measures typically used in environmental policy research.

[1]  Bruce Tonn,et al.  A Framework for Understanding and Improving Environmental Decision Making , 2000 .

[2]  A. Schneider,et al.  Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[3]  Sarah B. Pralle Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change: The Internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy , 2003, Journal of Public Policy.

[4]  Murat Işık Environmental Regulation and the Spatial Structure of the U.S. Dairy Sector , 2004 .

[5]  E. Ringquist Policy Influence and Policy Responsiveness in State Pollution Control , 1994 .

[6]  Aseem Prakash,et al.  Greening the firm : the politics of corporate environmentalism , 2000 .

[7]  R. Elmore INSTRUMENTS AND STRATEGY IN PUBLIC POLICY , 1987 .

[8]  R. Feiock,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Economic Development: the Movement of Chemical Production Among States , 1990 .

[9]  M. Goggin,et al.  Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[10]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  A DESIGN PERSPECTIVE ON POLICY IMPLEMENTATION: THE FALLACIES OF MISPLACED PRESCRIPTION , 1987 .

[11]  A. Bowman,et al.  Hazardous Wastes, Politics, and Public Policy: a Comparative State Analysis , 1983, The Western political quarterly.

[12]  L. Salamon,et al.  The tools of government : a guide to the new governance , 2002 .

[13]  S. Wing,et al.  Concentrated swine feeding operations and public health: a review of occupational and community health effects. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[14]  Daniel A. Mazmanian,et al.  Implementation and public policy , 1983 .

[15]  T. Lowi,et al.  The end of liberalism : the second republic of the United States , 1969 .

[16]  Patricia W. Ingraham TOWARD MORE SYSTEMATIC CONSIDERATION OF POLICY DESIGN1 , 1987 .

[17]  Lael R. Keiser,et al.  Policy Design, Bureaucratic Incentives, and Public Management: The Case of Child Support Enforcement , 1996 .

[18]  John D. Huber,et al.  Legislatures and statutory control of bureaucracy , 2001 .

[19]  Mark R. Metcalfe State Legislation Regulating Animal Manure Management , 2000 .

[20]  Timothy N. Cason,et al.  Why do firms volunteer to exceed environmental regulations? : Understanding participation in EPA's 33/50 program , 1996 .

[21]  K. Meier The Political Economy of Consumer Protection: an Examination of State Legislation , 1987 .

[22]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[23]  E. Jennings,et al.  Administration, Governance, and Policy Tools in Welfare Policy Implementation , 2004 .

[24]  Michael A. Pagano,et al.  The State of American Federalism, 1993–1994 , 1994 .

[25]  W. Lowry The Dimensions of Federalism: State Governments and Pollution Control Policies , 1991 .

[26]  E. Ringquist,et al.  Environmental Protection at the State Level: Politics and Progress in Controlling Pollution , 1993 .

[27]  William D. Berry Utility Regulation in the States: The Policy Effects of Professionalism and Salience to the Consumer , 1979 .

[28]  A. Sardell Policy Design and the Politics of Implementation: The Case of Child Health Care in the American States , 1988 .

[29]  Mark R. Metcalfe U.S. Hog Production and the Influence of State Water Quality Regulation , 2001 .

[30]  P. May Mandate design and implementation: Enhancing implementation efforts and shaping regulatory styles , 1993 .

[31]  Michael J. Licari,et al.  Regulatory Policy When Behavior is Addictive: Smoking, Cigarette Taxes and Bootlegging , 1997 .

[32]  M. Allen Laying Down the Law? Interest Group Influence on State Adoption of Animal Cruelty Felony Laws , 2005 .

[33]  A. Schneider,et al.  Policy Design for Democracy , 1997 .

[34]  Analyzing Mandate Design: State Mandates Governing Hazard-Prone Areas , 1994 .