Can a tool that automates insulin titration be a key to diabetes management?

BACKGROUND Most patients who use insulin do not achieve optimal glycemic control and become susceptible to complications. Numerous clinical trials have shown that frequent insulin dosage titration is imperative to achieve glycemic control. Unfortunately, implementation of such a paradigm is often impractical. We hypothesized that the Diabetes Insulin Guidance System (DIGS™) (Hygieia, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI) software, which automatically advises patients on adjustment of insulin dosage, would provide safe and effective weekly insulin dosage adjustments. SUBJECTS AND METHODS In a feasibility study we enrolled patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, treated with a variety of insulin regimens and having suboptimal glycemic control. The 12-week intervention period followed a 4-week baseline run-in period. During the intervention, DIGS processed patients' glucose readings and provided insulin dosage adjustments on a weekly basis. If approved by the study team, the adjusted insulin dosage was communicated to the patients. Insulin formulations were not changed during the study. The primary outcome was the fraction of DIGS dosage adjustments approved by the study team, and the secondary outcome was improved glycemic control. RESULTS Forty-six patients were recruited, and eight withdrew. The DIGS software recommended 1,734 insulin dosage adjustments, of which 1,731 (99.83%) were approved. During the run-in period the weekly average glucose was stable at 174.2±36.7 mg/dL (9.7±2.0 mmol/L). During the following 12 weeks, DIGS dosage adjustments resulted in progressive improvement in average glucose to 163.3±35.1 mg/dL (9.1±1.9 mmol/L) (P<0.03). Mean glycosylated hemoglobin decreased from 8.4±0.8% to 7.9±0.9% (P<0.05). Concomitantly, the frequency of hypoglycemia decreased by 25.2%. CONCLUSIONS The DIGS software provided patients with safe and effective weekly insulin dosage adjustments. Widespread implementation of DIGS may improve the outcome and reduce the cost of implementing effective insulin therapy.

[1]  A. Bhargava,et al.  A(1c) control in a primary care setting: self-titrating an insulin analog pre-mix (INITIATEplus trial). , 2009, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  J. Leahy,et al.  Fully Automated Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery Versus Semiautomated Hybrid Control in Pediatric Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using an Artificial Pancreas , 2008 .

[3]  I. Hirsch,et al.  Outpatient insulin therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: scientific review. , 2003, JAMA.

[4]  Janet M. Allen,et al.  Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[5]  P. Cryer The Barrier of Hypoglycemia in Diabetes , 2008, Diabetes.

[6]  B. Zinman,et al.  Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy: A Consensus Statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[7]  The effort required to achieve and maintain optimal glycemic control. , 2011, Journal of diabetes and its complications.

[8]  Aaron J. Kowalski,et al.  Can we really close the loop and how soon? Accelerating the availability of an artificial pancreas: a roadmap to better diabetes outcomes. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[9]  S. Bowlin,et al.  Glycemic control from 1988 to 2000 among U.S. adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a preliminary report. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[10]  Bruce W Bode,et al.  Glycemic characteristics in continuously monitored patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: normative values. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[11]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .

[12]  W. Herman,et al.  Are glucose readings sufficient to adjust insulin dosage? , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[13]  I. Colin,et al.  Glucose Meters with Built-In Automated Bolus Calculator: Gadget or Real Value for Insulin-Treated Diabetic Patients? , 2012, Diabetes Therapy.

[14]  Z. Bloomgarden European Association For The Study Of Diabetes , 2002, Diabetologia.

[15]  UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group Risk of hypoglycaemia in types 1 and 2 diabetes: effects of treatment modalities and their duration , 2007, Diabetologia.

[16]  W. Ambrosius,et al.  Update of the ACCORD Eye Study. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  P. Cryer,et al.  Hypoglycaemia: The limiting factor in the glycaemic management of Type I and Type II Diabetes* , 2002, Diabetologia.

[18]  Howard C. Zisser,et al.  Technology to inform insulin dose adjustments: its time is near. , 2012, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[19]  P. Donnan,et al.  Frequency and predictors of hypoglycaemia in Type 1 and insulin‐treated Type 2 diabetes: a population‐based study , 2005, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[20]  J. Fitzgerald,et al.  Primary care physician beliefs about insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes , 2008, International journal of clinical practice.

[21]  H. Wolpert Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Detection and Prevention of Hypoglycemia , 2007, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[22]  A. Cerami,et al.  Correlation of glucose regulation and hemoglobin AIc in diabetes mellitus. , 1976, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Advanced meter features improve postprandial and paired self-monitoring of blood glucose in individuals with diabetes: results of the Actions with the CONTOUR Blood Glucose Meter and Behaviors in Frequent Testers (ACT) study. , 2012, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[24]  Ray Burke,et al.  A clinical trial of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in older adults with type 2 diabetes. , 2005, Diabetes care.

[25]  R. Bergenstal,et al.  Adjust to Target in Type 2 Diabetes , 2008, Diabetes Care.

[26]  M. Riddle The underuse of insulin therapy in North America , 2002, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[27]  Uk-Prospective-Diabetes-Study-Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) , 1998, The Lancet.

[28]  Matthew D. Davis,et al.  Effect of intensive therapy on the microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus. , 2002, JAMA.

[29]  A. Farmer,et al.  Three-year efficacy of complex insulin regimens in type 2 diabetes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  A. Morris,et al.  Frequency of severe hypoglycemia requiring emergency treatment in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a population-based study of health service resource use. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[31]  B. Zinman,et al.  Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy , 2009, Diabetes Care.