Targeting the biotechnology clusters in North Carolina and Israel: lessons from successful and unsuccessful policy making

This paper analyses the development of biotechnology clusters in North Carolina (NC) and Israel. In both NC and Israel, when the biotechnology was identified as a potential strategic priority, the framework conditions were suitable for successful policy-targeting. NC presents a case of a successful transition from a traditional manufacturing economy to a knowledge economy. The most successful part of this transition was a policy-led development of a biotechnology cluster in the Research Triangle. While Israel also presents a case of a successful transition from a low-tech economy to a knowledge-intensive economy, Israel failed to develop a successful biotechnology cluster. We suggest that this failure is mostly due to a failure to implement policy to encourage such development. We argue that the elements, which separate NC's success from Israel's failure, are: a clear vision and strategic planning; timely response, long-term commitment; strong leadership; cooperation between the government, private sector and academia, and an adjustable policy-making process.

[1]  Michele Mastroeni,et al.  GUEST EDITORIAL: The evolution and dynamics of biotechnology systems of innovation: the role of policy targeting , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[2]  Albert N. Link,et al.  The Growth of Research Triangle Park , 2003 .

[3]  Dan Kaufmann,et al.  The Role of Location and Regional Networks for Biotechnology Firms in Israel , 2003 .

[4]  Harold J. Morowitz,et al.  The Encyclopedia of Science and Technology , 2001 .

[5]  J. W. Hardin.  North Carolina's Research Triangle Park: overview, history, success factors and lessons learned , 2008 .

[6]  Gil Avnimelech,et al.  Evolutionary policy targeting: towards a conceptual framework for effective policy intervention , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[7]  G. Avnimelech,et al.  FROM DIRECT SUPPORT OF BUSINESS SECTOR R&D/INNOVATION TO TARGETING VENTURE CAPITAL/PRIVATE EQUITY: A CATCHING-UP INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY LIFE CYCLE PERSPECTIVE , 2008 .

[8]  TATuP Redaktion.  World Conference on Science and Technology Parks , 1998 .

[9]  Steve Steiner,et al.  Missing link , 1989 .

[10]  W. Rohe.  The Research Triangle: From Tobacco Road to Global Prominence , 2011 .

[11]  G. Avnimelech,et al.  Towards a systemic and evolutionary framework for venture capital policy , 2011 .

[12]  Elio Rossi,et al.  Policy , 2007, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM.

[13]  Networking: The “Missing Link” in Public R&D Support Schemes , 2008 .

[14]  Abdelillah Hamdouch,et al.  Conceptualizing Innovation Clusters and Networks , 2008 .

[15]  G. Avnimelech.  A Five-phase Entrepreneurial Oriented Innovation and Technology Policy Profile: The Israeli Experience , 2008 .

[16]  Gil Avnimelech,et al.  Venture capital start-up co-evolution and the emergence & development of Israel's new high tech cluster , 2004 .

[17]  G. Dutrénit,et al.  Building bridges between co-evolutionary approaches to science, technology and innovation and development economics: an interpretive model , 2011 .

[18]  G. Avnimelech,et al.  Creating venture capital industries that co-evolve with high tech: Insights from an extended industry life cycle perspective of the Israeli experience , 2006 .

[19]  M. Teubal,et al.  Evolutionary targeting , 2008 .

[20]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[21]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Regional Corporate Spawning and the Role of Homegrown Companies , 2010 .