Energy and entropy analysis of closed adiabatic expansion based trilateral cycles

Abstract A vast amount of heat energy is available at low cost within the range of medium and low temperatures. Existing thermal cycles cannot make efficient use of such available low grade heat because they are mainly based on conventional organic Rankine cycles which are limited by Carnot constraints. However, recent developments related to the performance of thermal cycles composed of closed processes have led to the exceeding of the Carnot factor. Consequently, once the viability of closed process based thermal cycles that surpass the Carnot factor operating at low and medium temperatures is globally accepted, research work will aim at looking into the consequences that lead from surpassing the Carnot factor while fulfilling the 2nd law, its impact on the 2nd law efficiency definition as well as the impact on the exergy transfer from thermal power sources to any heat consumer, including thermal cycles. The methodology used to meet the proposed objectives involves the analysis of energy and entropy on trilateral closed process based thermal cycles. Thus, such energy and entropy analysis is carried out upon non-condensing mode trilateral thermal cycles (TCs) characterised by the conversion of low grade heat into mechanical work undergoing closed adiabatic path functions: isochoric heat absorption, adiabatic heat to mechanical work conversion and isobaric heat rejection. Firstly, cycle energy analysis is performed to determine the range of some relevant cycle parameters, such as the operating temperatures and their associated pressures, entropies, internal energies and specific volumes. In this way, the ranges of temperatures within which the Carnot factor is exceeded are determined, where carbon dioxide, nitrogen, helium and hydrogen are considered as real working fluids, followed by an entropic analysis in order to verify 2nd law fulfilment. The results of the analysis show that within a range of relatively low operating temperatures, high thermal efficiency is achieved, reaching 44.9% for helium when the Carnot factor is 33.3% under a ratio of temperatures of 450/300 K. With respect to entropy analysis, it is verified that the results of the latter demonstrate compliance with the second principle, while violating Carnot constraints, since the Carnot factor is constrained only by the Carnot, Stirling and Ericsson cycles and its associated Carnot engine characteristics. However, the most relevant findings through the performed analysis concern the detection of some inconsistencies regarding the conventional 2nd law efficiency definition and the exergy transfer definition from thermal power sources to thermal cycles. In summary, a TC undergoing isochoric heat absorption, adiabatic expansion and isobaric heat rejection under closed transformations can yield improved performance over traditional thermal cycles, even exceeding the Carnot factor under relatively low top temperatures, for which Carnot efficiency is lower. Furthermore, the concept of 2nd law efficiency, defined as the ratio of the thermal to the Carnot efficiency, has been reconsidered in agreement with the results achieved. That is, the definition of 2nd law efficiency lacks both theoretical and practical sense. In the same way, as a result of discarding the Carnot factor as limiting the thermal efficiency, the definition of the exergy transfer to a thermal cycle (the maximum available energy) must be defined as the product of the transferred heat from a heat source and the thermal efficiency.

[1]  Ramón Ferreiro García,et al.  Preliminary thermodynamic study of regenerative Otto based cycles with zero NOx emissions operating with adiabatic and polytropic expansion , 2016 .

[2]  V. Dolz,et al.  Experimental and thermodynamic analysis of a bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) of gasoline engine using swash-plate expander , 2015 .

[3]  M. McLinden,et al.  NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 8.0 , 2007 .

[4]  Tzu-Chen Hung,et al.  Thermoeconomic comparison between pure and mixture working fluids of organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery , 2015 .

[5]  He Weifeng,et al.  Thermal matching performance of a geothermal ORC system using zeotropic working fluids , 2015 .

[6]  A. Borsukiewicz-Gozdur,et al.  Comparative analysis of natural and synthetic refrigerants in application to low temperature Clausius–Rankine cycle , 2007 .

[7]  Min-Hsiung Yang,et al.  Thermal and economic analyses of a compact waste heat recovering system for the marine diesel engine using transcritical Rankine cycle , 2015 .

[8]  Linjun Wang,et al.  An open steam power cycle used for IC engine exhaust gas energy recovery , 2012 .

[9]  E. Michaelides Future directions and cycles for electricity production from geothermal resources , 2016 .

[10]  Hans-Erik Ångström,et al.  A review of turbocompounding as a waste heat recovery system for internal combustion engines , 2015 .

[11]  T. Hung Waste heat recovery of organic Rankine cycle using dry fluids , 2001 .

[12]  Naijun Zhou,et al.  Fluid selection and parametric optimization of organic Rankine cycle using low temperature waste heat , 2012 .

[13]  Gequn Shu,et al.  Fluids and parameters optimization for the organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) used in exhaust heat recovery of Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) , 2012 .

[14]  Mehmet Kanoglu,et al.  First and second law analysis of diesel engine powered cogeneration systems , 2008 .

[15]  Xiaosong Zhang,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of a novel energy-efficient refrigeration system subcooled by liquid desiccant dehumidification and evaporation , 2014 .

[16]  S. K. Wang,et al.  A Review of Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs) for the Recovery of Low-grade Waste Heat , 1997 .

[17]  G. Angelino,et al.  Multicomponent Working Fluids For Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs) , 1998 .

[18]  M. Fallah,et al.  Advanced exergy analysis of the Kalina cycle applied for low temperature enhanced geothermal system , 2016 .

[19]  H. A. Ajimotokan,et al.  Thermodynamic performance simulation and design optimisation of trilateral-cycle engines for waste heat recovery-to-power generation , 2015 .

[20]  David S.-K. Ting,et al.  Second law analysis of the transcritical CO2 refrigeration cycle , 2004 .

[21]  Ramón Ferreiro García,et al.  Power Plant Driven by Residual Heat Rejected by the Bottoming Low Pressure Steam Turbines , 2015 .

[22]  Rahman Saidur,et al.  Technologies to recover exhaust heat from internal combustion engines , 2012 .

[23]  Takahisa Yamamoto,et al.  Design and testing of the Organic Rankine Cycle , 2001 .

[24]  He Weifeng,et al.  Experimental study on Organic Rankine cycle for low grade thermal energy recovery. , 2016 .

[25]  Ramón Ferreiro García,et al.  Isothermal and Adiabatic Expansion Based Trilateral Cycles , 2015 .

[26]  Antti Uusitalo,et al.  Technology competition in the internal combustion engine waste heat recovery: a patent landscape analysis , 2016 .

[27]  Johann Fischer,et al.  Comparison of trilateral cycles and organic Rankine cycles , 2011 .

[28]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of a novel ammonia-water trilateral Rankine cycle , 2008 .

[29]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  An examination of regenerative organic Rankine cycles using dry fluids , 2008 .

[30]  Ramón Ferreiro García Contributions on Closed System Transformations Based Thermal Cycles , 2014 .

[31]  Yiping Dai,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of an (organic Rankine cycle) ORC using low grade heat source , 2013 .

[32]  Ian K. Smith,et al.  Development of the Trilateral Flash Cycle System: Part 1: Fundamental Considerations , 1993 .

[33]  Dongxiang Wang,et al.  Efficiency and optimal performance evaluation of organic Rankine cycle for low grade waste heat power generation , 2013 .

[34]  Jian Song,et al.  Parametric analysis of a dual loop Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) system for engine waste heat recovery , 2015 .

[35]  Ramón Ferreiro García Preliminary Study of an Efficient OTEC Using a Thermal Cycle with Closed Thermodynamic Transformations , 2014 .

[36]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source , 2015 .

[37]  Yang Shi,et al.  Comparison between regenerative organic Rankine cycle (RORC) and basic organic Rankine cycle (BORC) based on thermoeconomic multi-objective optimization considering exergy efficiency and levelized energy cost (LEC) , 2015 .