HABITAT SELECTION BY WOOD TURTLES (CLEMMYS INSCULPTA): AN APPLICATION OF PAIRED LOGISTIC REGRESSION

Models of habitat selection have been developed primarily for mobile animals with well-defined home ranges. The assumptions made by traditional techniques about habitat availability are inappropriate for species with low mobility and large home ranges, such as the wood turtle. We used paired logistic regression, typically used in medical case - control studies, to model selection of habitat within activity areas in a population of wood turtles in a watershed in western Maine. We also modeled selection of activity areas within the watershed, using nonpaired logistic regression. Within activity areas, wood turtles selected nonforested locations close to water with low canopy cover. Within the watershed, they selected activity areas close to streams and rivers with moderate forest cover and little open water. The difference between selection at these two scales suggests that wood turtles select forest edges to balance thermoregulatory and feeding needs. The model of selection of activity areas within the watershed correctly classified 84% of activity areas and random areas. This model may be useful for identifying wood turtle habitat across the landscape as part of regional conservation efforts. We suggest that paired logistic regression shows promise for analysis of habitat selection of species with movement patterns that violate the assumptions of traditional habitat selection models.

[1]  R. Haight,et al.  A Regional Landscape Analysis and Prediction of Favorable Gray Wolf Habitat in the Northern Great Lakes Region , 1995 .

[2]  J. Bissonette,et al.  Marten subnivean access point use: response to subnivean prey levels , 1994 .

[3]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2000 .

[4]  D. Hunsaker.  3 – Ecology of New World Marsupials , 1977 .

[5]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[6]  Malcolm P. North,et al.  Microhabitat analysis using radiotelemetry locations and polytomous logistic regression , 1996 .

[7]  N. Breslow,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research: volume 1- The analysis of case-control studies , 1980 .

[8]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[9]  W. Mccomb,et al.  Selection of day roosts by female long-legged myotis in the central Oregon Cascade Range , 1998 .

[10]  Kevin S. McKelvey,et al.  Estimation of habitat selection for central-place foraging animals. , 1999 .

[11]  J. Lovich,et al.  Turtles of the United States and Canada , 1995 .

[12]  J. H. Kaufmann.  Habitat use by wood turtles in central Pennsylvania , 1992 .

[13]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Assessing habitat selection when availability changes , 1996 .

[14]  N. Quinn,et al.  Seasonal movements and habitat of wood turtles (Clemmys insculpta) in Algonquin Park, Canada , 1991 .

[15]  N. Breslow,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 1. The analysis of case-control studies. , 1981 .

[16]  Charles E. McCulloch,et al.  MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS IN ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS: PANACEA OR PANDORA'S BOX? , 1990 .

[17]  Joanna Burger,et al.  A 20-YR STUDY DOCUMENTING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TURTLE DECLINE AND HUMAN RECREATION' , 1995 .

[18]  F. R. Cagle.  A System of Marking Turtles for Future Identification , 1939 .

[19]  Dag Ø. Hjermann,et al.  Analyzing habitat selection in animals without well-defined home ranges , 2000 .

[20]  B. Efron,et al.  A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and , 1983 .

[21]  R. Buech,et al.  Identification of wood turtle nesting areas for protection and management , 1997 .

[22]  M. Morrison,et al.  Development and evaluation of habitat models for herpetofauna and small mammals , 1998 .