Validation of mutual information-based registration of CT and bone SPECT images in dual-isotope studies

The registration of computed tomography (CT) and nuclear medicine (NM) images can substantially enhance patient diagnosis as it allows for the fusion of anatomical and functional information, as well as the attenuation correction of NM images. However, irrespective of the method used, registration accuracy depends heavily on the characteristics of the images that are registered and the degree of similarity between them. This poses a challenge for registering CT and NM images as they have very different characteristics and content. To address the particular problem of registering single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) oncology studies with corresponding CT, we have proposed to perform a dual-isotope study with simultaneous injection of a tumor tracer and a bone imaging agent to obtain a tumor SPECT and a bone SPECT image that are inherently registered. As bone structures are generally visible in both CT and bone SPECT, performing registration of these images will be more easily attainable than registration of CT and tumor SPECT. By subsequently applying the spatial transformation determined from this registration to the tumor SPECT acquired from the same dual-isotope study, the optimal alignment between the CT and tumor SPECT images can be obtained. In this paper, we present the proof-of-concept of the proposed approach, the MI-based algorithm employed, and the techniques used to select the algorithm's parameters. Our objectives are to show the feasibility of CT and bone SPECT registration using this algorithm and to validate quantitatively the results generated using clinical data.

[1]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Quantitative Comparison of Sinc-Approximating Kernels for Medical Image Interpolation , 1999, MICCAI.

[2]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Anatomical-based FDG-PET reconstruction for the detection of hypo-metabolic regions in epilepsy , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  J Hornegger,et al.  Effect of CT-based attenuation correction on uptake ratios in skeletal SPECT , 2007, Nuklearmedizin.

[5]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Deformations Incorporating Rigid Structures , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[6]  G. Hamarneh,et al.  Co-registration of Bone CT and SPECT Images Using Mutual Information , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology.

[7]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Polyrigid and Polyaffine Transformations: A New Class of Diffeomorphisms for Locally Rigid or Affine Registration , 2003, MICCAI.

[8]  John C Roeske,et al.  Incorporation of SPECT bone marrow imaging into intensity modulated whole-pelvic radiation therapy treatment planning for gynecologic malignancies. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Deformable registration of multi-modal data including rigid structures , 2002, 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[10]  Damini Dey,et al.  Automated 3-dimensional registration of stand-alone (18)F-FDG whole-body PET with CT. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  G.J. O'Keefe,et al.  Comparison and Evaluation of PET/CT Image Registration , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[12]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A survey of medical image registration , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  Anatomically Guided Registration of Whole Body Mouse MR Images , 2003, MICCAI.

[14]  Richard L Wahl,et al.  Prevalence of misregistration between SPECT and CT for attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[15]  Tracy L. Faber,et al.  Automated quality control of emission-transmission misalignment for attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT-CT systems , 2005 .

[16]  L. Bidaut,et al.  Automated registration of dynamic MR images for the quantification of myocardial perfusion , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  R. Shekhar,et al.  Automated 3-dimensional elastic registration of whole-body PET and CT from separate or combined scanners. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Jan Flusser,et al.  Image registration methods: a survey , 2003, Image Vis. Comput..

[19]  David R. Haynor,et al.  PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Ora Israel,et al.  SPECT/CT in tumor imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[21]  Dwight E Heron,et al.  Advances in image-guided radiation therapy--the role of PET-CT. , 2006, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[22]  Colin Studholme,et al.  Measures of 3D medical image alignment , 1997 .

[23]  J. Chu,et al.  CT and PET lung image registration and fusion in radiotherapy treatment planning using the chamfer-matching method. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Torsten Kuwert,et al.  Anatomical accuracy of hybrid SPECT/spiral CT in the lower spine , 2006, Nuclear medicine communications.

[25]  Jeffrey Tsao,et al.  Interpolation artifacts in multimodality image registration based on maximization of mutual information , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Medical image registration using mutual information , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[27]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[28]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Clinically feasible reconstruction of 3D whole-body PET/CT data using blurred anatomical labels. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  G. Marchal,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997 .

[30]  A. Celler,et al.  An APD-based Iterative Reconstruction Method for Simultaneous Technetium-99m/lodine-123 SPECT Imaging , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[31]  Michael Unser,et al.  Stochastic Sampling for Computing the Mutual Information of Two Images , 2003 .

[32]  M. Braun,et al.  Software for image registration: algorithms, accuracy, efficacy. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[33]  C A Pelizzari,et al.  Using vascular structure for CT-SPECT registration in the pelvis. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  Kazuo Awai,et al.  Initial experience with X-ray ct based attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion spect imaging using a combined spect/ct system , 2005, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[35]  Jyrki Lötjönen,et al.  Evaluation of cardiac PET-MRI registration methods using a numerical breathing phantom , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[36]  Serenella Russo,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of image registration and segmentation tools used in conformal treatment planning of prostate cancer , 2006, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[37]  Colin Studholme,et al.  Evaluation of the limits of visual detection of image misregistration in a brain fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET MRI study , 1997, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[38]  Colin Studholme,et al.  Visual assessment of the accuracy of retrospective registration of MR and CT images of the brain , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[39]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  Co-registration of CT-SPECT images for tumor localization and dosimetry , 2006 .

[40]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  Automatic CT-SPECT registration of livers treated with radioactive microspheres. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[41]  Tracy L Faber,et al.  Automated quality control of emission-transmission misalignment for attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT-CT systems. , 2006, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[42]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  Evaluation of 3D multimodality image registration using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[43]  M. Federle,et al.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography: protocol issues and options. , 2006, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[44]  Giovanna Rizzo,et al.  Automatic integration of PET/CT images for clinical use in radiotherapy , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[45]  Piotr J Slomka,et al.  Software Approach to Merging Molecular with Anatomic Information , 2004 .

[46]  Peter Bartenstein,et al.  SPET/CT image co-registration in the abdomen with a simple and cost-effective tool , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.