User-operated speech in noise test: Implementation and comparison with a traditional test

Abstract Objective: The purpose of this study was to implement and evaluate a user-operated speech in noise test. Design: The test is based on the Danish speech material Dantale II, which consists of five words sentences (18). For each word presented the subject selected a response from ten alternative words. Two versions of the test were made: one with and one without the possibility that for each word presented the subject could answer “I do not know” (?-button). Using a listening test the two versions were evaluated against a traditional test, where the subjects orally repeated the words that were perceived. Study sample: Twenty-four normal-hearing subjects. Results: The speech intelligibility as a function of the signal-to-noise ratio can be described by logistic functions in the different user-operated tests and in the traditional test. The logistic parameters obtained from the user-operated test with the ?-button agree with the parameters obtained in a traditional test. The homogeneity of the speech material is uninfluenced when the material is used in a user-operated test. Conclusions: It is reasonable to use the Dantale II speech material for a user-operated speech in noise test, and the use of the ?-button is favourable.

[1]  Wouter A. Dreschler,et al.  Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, Part 2: Improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[2]  Torsten Dau,et al.  The Danish hearing in noise test , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[3]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[4]  B Hagerman,et al.  Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[5]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Anna Warzybok,et al.  Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[7]  Wouter A Dreschler,et al.  Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, Part 1: Test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[8]  Virginia M. Richards,et al.  Stimulus step size and heterogeneous stimulus conditions in adaptive psychophysics , 1989 .

[9]  W. Newey,et al.  Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing , 1986 .

[10]  A. Boothroyd Statistical theory of the speech discrimination score. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: A multi-center study , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[12]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[13]  C Ludvigsen,et al.  DANTALE: a new Danish speech material. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology.