Knowledge and Perspectives on the Welfare of Italian Heavy Pigs on Farms

Simple Summary Italian heavy pigs are characterized by much higher body weights and age at slaughter (approximately 160–170 kg, and over 9 months of age) than the majority of pigs reared in Europe. This results in peculiar behavioral and rearing-related needs compared to smaller pigs. However, there is a limited body of research dealing with the welfare of this productive category. The aim of this review is to collect the most significant available information on welfare issues of heavy pigs on farms and to highlight recent findings and areas needing additional research. It is hoped that these findings will, in the future, serve as a basis for the development of specific policies aimed at enhancing the ethical attributes of this renowned production. Abstract This review aims to give an overview of the most significant available information on welfare issues of Italian heavy pigs on farms. These animals, whose meat is used to produce typical products, are characterized by much higher body weights and age at slaughter (approximately 160–170 kg, and 9 months of age) than most pigs reared in Europe, resulting in peculiar behavioral and rearing-related needs. To highlight the main findings and the areas in which additional research is needed, the paper was organized by allocating the studies on the basis of the Welfare Quality four principles framework, i.e., good feeding, good housing, good health, and appropriate behavior. The results indicate the possibility of improvement with regard to the management of feeding, watering, and some environmental parameters (light, thermal comfort, enrichments) and a lack of knowledge on the actual space requirements (and a corresponding regulatory gap). Moreover, deficiencies concerning the prevalence of injuries and disease and the relationship between lesions observed post-mortem and rearing conditions needs to be addressed. Lastly, the absence of research concerning the evaluation of the emotional state of animals has been highlighted. It is hoped that these findings will, in the future, serve as a basis for the development of specific policies for these animals in order to increase the ethical value of the entire production chain, in accordance with consumers’ demand and expectation for high animal welfare standards.

[1]  P. Trevisi,et al.  Benchmarking of anatomopathological lesions assessed at slaughter and their association with tail lesions and carcass traits in heavy pigs , 2021, Italian Journal of Animal Science.

[2]  E. Zanardi,et al.  Abattoir-Based Measures to Assess Swine Welfare: Analysis of the Methods Adopted in European Slaughterhouses , 2021, Animals.

[3]  A. Aarnink,et al.  Soiling of Pig Pens: A Review of Eliminative Behaviour , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[4]  Anastasia A. Semenova,et al.  Exploratory Survey on European Consumer and Stakeholder Attitudes towards Alternatives for Surgical Castration of Piglets , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[5]  S. Schiavon,et al.  A Short Period of Darkness after Mixing of Growing Pigs Intended for PDO Hams Production Reduces Skin Lesions , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[6]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Factors that Influence Farmers’ Views on Farm Animal Welfare: A Semi-Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis , 2020, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[7]  J. Yee,et al.  Positive Welfare and the Like: Distinct Views and a Proposed Framework , 2020, Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

[8]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Comparison of different scoring keys for tail-biting in pigs to evaluate the importance of one common scoring key to improve the comparability of studies – A review , 2019 .

[9]  G. Martelli,et al.  Towards the Abandonment of Surgical Castration in Pigs: How is Immunocastration Perceived by Italian Consumers? , 2019, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[10]  N. De Briyne,et al.  Efforts to Ban the Routine Tail Docking of Pigs and to Give Pigs Enrichment Materials via EU Law: Where Do We Stand a Quarter of a Century on? , 2019, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[11]  G. Martelli,et al.  Effects of increased space allowance on animal welfare, meat and ham quality of heavy pigs slaughtered at 160Kg , 2019, PloS one.

[12]  M. Bacci,et al.  Enrichment devices for undocked heavy pigs: effects on animal welfare, blood parameters and production traits , 2019 .

[13]  A. Bonaldo,et al.  Enrichment tools for undocked heavy pigs: effects on body and gastric lesions and carcase and meat quality parameters , 2019 .

[14]  N. Vitale,et al.  Animal-based measures on fattening heavy pigs at the slaughterhouse and the association with animal welfare at the farm level: a preliminary study. , 2019, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[15]  Organic farming in the EU A fast growing sector , 2019 .

[16]  S. Edwards,et al.  Skin lesion monitoring at slaughter on heavy pigs (170 kg): Welfare indicators and ham defects , 2018, PloS one.

[17]  Irene Camerlink,et al.  The translation of animal welfare research into practice: The case of mixing aggression between pigs , 2018, Applied Animal Behaviour Science.

[18]  E. Zanardi,et al.  Development and test of a visual-only meat inspection system for heavy pigs in Northern Italy , 2018, BMC Veterinary Research.

[19]  S. Edwards,et al.  Benchmarking of pluck lesions at slaughter as a health monitoring tool for pigs slaughtered at 170kg (heavy pigs). , 2017, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[20]  S. Edwards,et al.  Prevalence and risk factors for gastric ulceration in pigs slaughtered at 170 kg. , 2017, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[21]  J. DeRouchey,et al.  A review of heavy weight market pigs: status of knowledge and future needs assessment1 , 2017, Translational animal science.

[22]  A. Velarde,et al.  Application of the Welfare Quality® protocol in pig slaughterhouses of five countries , 2016 .

[23]  F. Gottardo,et al.  Frequency of tail lesions and risk factors for tail biting in heavy pig production from weaning to 170 kg live weight. , 2016, Veterinary journal.

[24]  G. Parolari,et al.  Effect of vaccination against gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in heavy male pigs for Italian typical dry-cured ham production. , 2015, Meat science.

[25]  D. Leibovici,et al.  Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability , 2015, Public Health Nutrition.

[26]  L. Bonfanti,et al.  The effect of tail docking on the welfare of pigs housed under challenging conditions , 2015 .

[27]  A. Bonaldo,et al.  Growth parameters, behavior, and meat and ham quality of heavy pigs subjected to photoperiods of different duration. , 2015, Journal of animal science.

[28]  F. Capitanio,et al.  What Foods are Identified as Animal Friendly by Italian Consumers? , 2014 .

[29]  E. Canali,et al.  Survey on the use of manipulable material as environmental enrichment in the pig farms in Italy. , 2014 .

[30]  L. Bonfanti,et al.  Continuous straw provision reduces prevalence of oesophago-gastric ulcer in pigs slaughtered at 170 kg (heavy pigs). , 2013, Research in veterinary science.

[31]  L. Bonfanti,et al.  Tail docking and the rearing of heavy pigs: the role played by gender and the presence of straw in the control of tail biting. Blood parameters, behaviour and skin lesions. , 2013, Research in veterinary science.

[32]  B. Kemp,et al.  Indicators of positive and negative emotions and emotional contagion in pigs , 2013, Physiology & Behavior.

[33]  G. Vignola,et al.  Water requirements of liquid-fed heavy pigs: Effect of water restriction on growth traits, animal welfare and meat and ham quality , 2013 .

[34]  G. Vignola,et al.  Meat and ham quality of Italian heavy pigs subjected to different illumination regimes. , 2012, Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift.

[35]  P. Bonilauri,et al.  Survey of pleuritis and pulmonary lesions in pigs at abattoir with a focus on the extent of the condition and herd risk factors. , 2012, Veterinary journal.

[36]  H. Spoolder,et al.  Development of a simplified Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for pigs , 2012 .

[37]  G. Martelli,et al.  The effects of two different light intensities on the production and behavioural traits of Italian heavy pigs. , 2010, Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift.

[38]  J. Ashton.  Animal health and welfare , 2009 .

[39]  H. Spoolder,et al.  Motivation for additional water use of growing-finishing pigs , 2009 .

[40]  L. Green,et al.  Impact of flooring on the health and welfare of pigs , 2009, In Practice.

[41]  Jon E. L. Day,et al.  A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems , 2009 .

[42]  Giovanna Martelli,et al.  Assessment of welfare in pigs , 2009 .

[43]  M. Guarino,et al.  Effect of group size-floor space allowance and floor type on growth performance and carcass characteristics of heavy pigs , 2008 .

[44]  I. Lean,et al.  Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs. , 2008, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[45]  A. Douard.  The protected designation of origin , 2008 .

[46]  A. Osterhaus,et al.  Animal health and welfare in fattening pigs in relation to housing and husbandry , 2008 .

[47]  C. Gusmara,et al.  Pneumonia disease assessment using a slaughterhouse lung-scoring method. , 2007, Journal of veterinary medicine. A, Physiology, pathology, clinical medicine.

[48]  Francesco Maria Tangorra,et al.  Static spatial requirements of growing-finishing and heavy pigs , 2006 .

[49]  A. Aarnink,et al.  Temperature and body weight affect fouling of pig pens. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[50]  G. Martelli,et al.  The Effects of the Duration of the Artificial Photoperiod on the Growth Parameters and Behaviour of Heavy Pigs , 2005, Veterinary Research Communications.

[51]  John Webster,et al.  Animal Welfare: Limping Towards Eden: A Practical Approach to Redressing the Problem of Our Dominion Over the Animals , 2005 .

[52]  M. Choct,et al.  Effect of liquid to feed ratio, steeping time, and enzyme supplementation on the performance of weaner pigs , 2004 .

[53]  A. Tamburini,et al.  Energy and nitrogen balance in heavy pigs fed different fibre sources , 2004 .

[54]  R. Friendship.  Gastric ulceration in swine , 2004 .

[55]  Christine J Nicol,et al.  A case control study of on-farm risk factors for tail biting in pigs , 2003 .

[56]  L. Désiré,et al.  Emotions in farm animals: a new approach to animal welfare in applied ethology , 2002, Behavioural Processes.

[57]  Sandra A. Edwards,et al.  Effect of social group size on aggressive behaviour between unacquainted domestic pigs , 2001 .

[58]  S. Edwards,et al.  Legislative methods for specifying stocking density and consequences for the welfare of finishing pigs. , 2000 .

[59]  S. Edwards,et al.  Behaviour, social interactions and lesion scores of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance , 1998 .

[60]  D. B. Anderson,et al.  Changes in pars esophageal tissue appearance of the porcine stomach in response to transportation, feed deprivation, and diet composition. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[61]  R. Ball,et al.  Effect of dietary particle size on gastric ulcers, assessed by endoscopic examination, and relationship between ulcer severity and growth performance of individually fed pigs , 1996 .