Differential evolution based on ε-domination and orthogonal design method for power environmentally-friendly dispatch

This paper proposes a differential evolution algorithm based on @e-domination and orthogonal design method (@e-ODEMO) to solve power dispatch problem considering environment protection and saving energy. Besides the operation costs of thermal power plant, contaminative gas emission is also optimized as an objective. In the proposed algorithm, @e-dominance is adopted to make genetic algorithm obtain a good distribution of Pareto-optimal solutions in a small computational time, and the orthogonal design method can generate an initial population of points that are scattered uniformly over the feasible solution space, these modify the differential evolution algorithm (DE) to make it suit for multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems and improve its performance. A test hydrothermal system is used to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. Compared with other methods, the results obtained demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm for solving the power environmentally-friendly dispatch problem.

[1]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[2]  R. Naresh,et al.  Two-phase neural network based solution technique for short term hydrothermal scheduling , 1999 .

[3]  R. Chakrabarti,et al.  An improved PSO technique for short-term optimal hydrothermal scheduling , 2009 .

[4]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  Combining Convergence and Diversity in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization , 2002, Evolutionary Computation.

[5]  Weiyi Qian,et al.  Adaptive differential evolution algorithm for multiobjective optimization problems , 2008, Appl. Math. Comput..

[6]  Hirotaka Nakayama,et al.  Theory of Multiobjective Optimization , 1985 .

[7]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Towards a Quick Computation of Well-Spread Pareto-Optimal Solutions , 2003, EMO.

[8]  M. A. Abido Environmental/economic power dispatch using multiobjective evolutionary algorithms , 2003 .

[9]  Leandro dos Santos Coelho,et al.  Improved differential evolution algorithms for handling economic dispatch optimization with generator constraints , 2007 .

[10]  Yuping Wang,et al.  An orthogonal genetic algorithm with quantization for global numerical optimization , 2001, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[11]  C. Fonseca Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization : Second International Conference, EMO 2003, Faro, Portugal, April 8-11, 2003 : proceedings , 2003 .

[12]  Arthur C. Sanderson,et al.  Pareto-based multi-objective differential evolution , 2003, The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2003. CEC '03..

[13]  H. Abbass The self-adaptive Pareto differential evolution algorithm , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).

[14]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: classifications, analyses, and new innovations , 1999 .

[15]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution - A simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces , 2004 .

[16]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[17]  Bogdan Filipic,et al.  DEMO: Differential Evolution for Multiobjective Optimization , 2005, EMO.

[18]  Xianzhong Duan,et al.  Study of differential evolution for optimal reactive power flow , 2007 .

[19]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm , 2001 .

[20]  N. Madavan Multiobjective optimization using a Pareto differential evolution approach , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).