Building Group Recommendations in E-Learning Systems

Building groups of students of similar features enables to suggest learning materials according to their member needs. The paper presents an agent-based recommender system, which, for each new learner, suggests a student group of similar profiles and consequently indicates suitable learning resources. It is assumed that learners can be characterized by cognitive styles, usability preferences or historical behavior, represented by nominal values. Building recommendations by using a Naive Bayes algorithm is considered. The performance of the technique is validated on the basis of data of learners, who are described by cognitive traits such as dominant learning style dimensions or by usability preferences. Tests are done for real data of different groups of similar students as well as of individual learners.

[1]  Grigorios N. Beligiannis,et al.  Integrating E-learning Environments with Computational Intelligence Assessment Agents , 2008 .

[2]  Giuseppe M. L. Sarnè,et al.  EFFICIENT PERSONALIZATION OF E‐LEARNING ACTIVITIES USING A MULTI‐DEVICE DECENTRALIZED RECOMMENDER SYSTEM , 2010, Comput. Intell..

[3]  Harry Zhang,et al.  The Optimality of Naive Bayes , 2004, FLAIRS.

[4]  Osmar R. Zaïane,et al.  Web Usage Mining for a Better Web-Based Learning Environment , 2001 .

[5]  Mohammad Issack Santally,et al.  Personalisation in Web-Based Learning Environments , 2006, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[6]  Wilhelmiina Hämäläinen,et al.  Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[7]  A. Wojciechowski,et al.  Identifying students usability needs in collaborative learning environments , 2008, 2008 Conference on Human System Interactions.

[8]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Inferring learning and attitudes from a Bayesian Network of log file data , 2005, AIED.

[9]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Personalized Links Recommendation Based on Data Mining in Adaptive Educational Hypermedia Systems , 2007, EC-TEL.

[10]  Fang Liu,et al.  A Comparison of Learning Style Theories on the Suitability for elearning , 2005, Web Technologies, Applications, and Services.

[11]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Detecting Student Misuse of Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[12]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[13]  E. Sutinen,et al.  Data Mining In Personalizing DistanceEducation Courses , 2006 .

[14]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005 , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Sotiris B. Kotsiantis,et al.  Supervised Machine Learning: A Review of Classification Techniques , 2007, Informatica.

[16]  Danuta Zakrzewska Validation of Clustering Techniques for Student Grouping in Intelligent E-learning Systems , 2012, Int. J. Organ. Collect. Intell..

[17]  Martin Gonzalez-Rodriguez,et al.  Improving accessibility with user-tailored interfaces , 2009, Applied Intelligence.

[18]  Danuta Zakrzewska Student Groups Modeling by Integrating Cluster Representation and Association Rules Mining , 2010, SOFSEM.

[19]  Osmar R. Zaïane,et al.  Building a Recommender Agent for e-Learning Systems , 2002, ICCE.

[20]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  An architecture for making recommendations to courseware authors using association rule mining and collaborative filtering , 2009, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[21]  Fan Yang,et al.  Data Mining and Case-Based Reasoning for Distance Learning , 2003, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[22]  Gordon I. McCalla,et al.  Smart Recommendation for an Evolving E-Learning System: Architecture and Experiment , 2005 .

[23]  Fan Yang,et al.  A Novel Resource Recommendation System Based on Connecting to Similar E-Learners , 2005, ICWL.

[24]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[25]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Adaptive Hypermedia , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[26]  Maria De Marsico,et al.  Evaluating web sites: exploiting user's expectations , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  Philip M. Long,et al.  Performance guarantees for hierarchical clustering , 2002, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[28]  Natalia Stash,et al.  Authoring of learning styles in adaptive hypermedia: problems and solutions , 2004, WWW Alt. '04.

[29]  David B. Shmoys,et al.  A Best Possible Heuristic for the k-Center Problem , 1985, Math. Oper. Res..

[30]  Analía Amandi,et al.  Evaluating Bayesian networks' precision for detecting students' learning styles , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Jens Liegle,et al.  The effect of learning styles on the navigation needs of Web-based learners , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Huaiqing Wang,et al.  Intelligent student profiling with fuzzy models , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[33]  Jiawei Han,et al.  Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques , 2000 .

[34]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  Naive Bayes models for probability estimation , 2005, ICML.