Ambulatory Assessment - Monitoring Behavior in Daily Life Settings A Behavioral-Scientific Challenge for Psychology

Ambulatory assessment refers to the use of computer-assisted methodology for self-reports, behavior records, or physiological measurements, while the participant undergoes normal daily activities. Since the 1980s, portable microcomputer systems and physiolog- ical recorders/analyzers have been developed for this purpose. In contrast to their use in medicine, these new methods have hardly entered the domain of psychology. Questionnaire methods are still preferred, in spite of the known deficiencies of retrospective self-reports. Assessment strategies include: continuous monitoring, monitoring with time- and event-sampling methods, in-field psychological testing, field experimentation, interactive assessment, symptom monitoring, and self-management. These approaches are innovative and address ecological validity, context specificity, and are suitable for practical applications. The advantages of this methodology, as well as issues of acceptance, compliance, and reactivity are discussed. Many technical developments and research contributions have come from the German-speaking countries and the Netherlands. Nonetheless, the current Decade of Behavior (APA) calls for a more widespread use of such techniques and developments in assessment. This position paper seeks to make the case for this approach by demonstrating the advantages - and in some domains - necessities of ambulatory monitoring methodology for a behavioral science orientation in psychology.

[1]  K. Lewin Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[2]  W. Mischel,et al.  Continuity and change in personality. , 1969, The American psychologist.

[3]  K. Pawlik,et al.  Inter-Setting-Korrelationen und Setting-Persönlichkeit-Wechselwirkungen: Ergebnisse einer Felduntersuchung zur Konsistenz von Verhalten und Erleben1 , 1984, 1984.

[4]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Validity and Reliability of the Experience‐Sampling Method , 1987, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[5]  M. Myrtek,et al.  Detection of emotionally induced ECG changes and their behavioural correlates: a new method for ambulatory monitoring. , 1988, European heart journal.

[6]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement , 1988 .

[7]  G. Cohen Memory In The Real World , 1989 .

[8]  Gillian Cohen,et al.  Memory for medical history: Accuracy of recall , 1995 .

[9]  M. Perrez,et al.  A computer-assisted self-monitoring procedure for assessing stress-related behavior under real life conditions , 1996 .

[10]  Umwelt und Verhalten , 1997 .

[11]  H. Bussmann,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of mobility-related activities in rehabilitation medicine , 1998 .

[12]  T. Leffingwell,et al.  Can people remember how they coped? Factors associated with discordance between same-day and retrospective reports , 1999 .

[13]  J. Fahrenberg,et al.  Ambulatory assessment : computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies , 1999 .

[14]  M. Perrez,et al.  How to assess social regulation of stress and emotions in daily family life? A computer-assisted family self-monitoring system (FASEM-C) , 2000 .

[15]  Control psychology under the control of questionnaires? The search for an alternative assessment procedure , 2000 .

[16]  Friedrich Foerster,et al.  Motion pattern and posture: Correctly assessed by calibrated accelerometers , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[17]  R. Stieglitz,et al.  Psychodiagnostik in Klinischer Psychologie, Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie , 2001 .

[18]  J. Fahrenberg,et al.  Pocketcomputer-unterstütztes Assessment mit MONITOR , 2001 .

[19]  Daniel J. Barrett,et al.  An Introduction to Computerized Experience Sampling in Psychology , 2001 .

[20]  C. Thiele,et al.  Diaries in clinical psychology and psychotherapy: a selective review , 2002 .

[21]  S. Meldrum Progress in Ambulatory Assessment: Computer Assisted Psychological and Psychophysiological Methods in Monitoring and Field Studies , 2002 .

[22]  Alltagsnahe Psychologie mit hand-held PC und physiologischem Mess-System. , 2002 .

[23]  Robert B. Bechtel,et al.  Handbook of environmental psychology , 2002 .

[24]  S. Armeli,et al.  Do we know how we cope? Relating daily coping reports to global and time-limited retrospective assessments. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  M. Myrtek,et al.  Heart and Emotion: Ambulatory Monitoring Studies in Everyday Life , 2004 .

[26]  M. Perrez,et al.  How is My Partner Feeling in Different Daily-Life Settings? Accuracy of Spouses' Judgements about Their Partner's Feelings at Work and at Home , 2004 .

[27]  R. Pohl Cognitive illusions : a handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory , 2004 .

[28]  Ambulantes psychophysiologisches Monitoring - neue Perspektiven und Anwendungen , 2006 .

[29]  J. Fahrenberg Assessment in daily life. A Review of Computer-assisted Methodologies and Applications in Psychology and Psychophysiology, years 2000-2005 , 2006 .

[30]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life , 2006 .

[31]  Tine Willum Hansen,et al.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and risk of cardiovascular disease: a population based study. , 2006, American journal of hypertension.

[32]  Meinrad Perrez Plädoyer für eine theorieadäquatere Methodik in gewissen Domänen der Psychologie , 2006 .

[33]  Audie A Atienza,et al.  The Science of Real-Time Data Capture: Self-Reports in Health Research , 2007 .

[34]  G. Michel Daily patterns of symptom reporting in families with adolescent children. , 2007, British journal of health psychology.