Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focussed ultrasound for the primary and salvage treatment of prostate cancer.

CONTEXT High-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging minimally invasive treatment option for prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of HIFU in both primary treatment of men with localised and locally advanced prostate cancer as well as salvage treatment of men with recurrent prostate cancer following treatment failure of radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We conducted a systematic literature search for studies conducted on humans and published in either English or German in several databases from 2000 to 2010. In addition, we screened several Web sites for assessments on HIFU in prostate cancer and contacted the manufacturers of the two currently available HIFU devices for supplemental information on HIFU. We included all prospective studies with >50 study participants and assessed their quality using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We identified 20 uncontrolled prospective case series, each of which treated between 58 and 517 patients. These studies were all conducted within the past decade. In total, 3018 patients were treated with HIFU, 93% for primary therapy and 7% for salvage HIFU. For all HIFU procedures, the biochemical disease-free survival rate at 1, 5, and 7 yr, respectively, was 78-84%, 45-84%, and 69%. The negative biopsy rate was 86% at 3 mo and 80% at 15 mo. Overall survival rates and prostate cancer-specific survival rates were 90% and 100% at 5 yr and 83% and 98% at 8 yr, respectively. Adverse events concerned the urinary tract (1-58%), potency (1-77%), the rectum (0-15%), and pain (1-6%). Quality-of-life assessment yielded controversial results. CONCLUSIONS Applying the GRADE approach, the available evidence on efficacy and safety of HIFU in prostate cancer is of very low quality, mainly due to study designs that lack control groups. More research is needed to explore the use of HIFU in prostate cancer.

[1]  T. Uchida,et al.  Transrectal high‐intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: Eight‐year experience , 2009, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[2]  H. Choi,et al.  High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer , 2006, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[3]  M. Menon,et al.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. , 2009, European urology.

[4]  Guy Vallancien,et al.  High-intensity focused ultrasound and localized prostate cancer: efficacy results from the European multicentric study. , 2003, Journal of endourology.

[5]  T. Uchida,et al.  Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a multicenter study. , 2005, Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica.

[6]  G. Muto,et al.  Visually directed transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of prostate cancer: a preliminary report on the Italian experience. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[7]  Bernhard Walter,et al.  First analysis of the long-term results with transrectal HIFU in patients with localised prostate cancer. , 2008, European urology.

[8]  Stefano Cavalleri,et al.  Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. , 2007, European urology.

[9]  Markus Graefen,et al.  Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications. , 2010, European urology.

[10]  Bernhard Walter,et al.  High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 5-year experience. , 2004, Urology.

[11]  J. Chapelon,et al.  Transrectal High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: Factors Influencing the Outcome , 2001, European Urology.

[12]  J. Mohler The 2010 NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology on prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[13]  Toyoaki Uchida,et al.  Treatment of localized prostate cancer using high‐intensity focused ultrasound , 2006, BJU international.

[14]  M. Emberton,et al.  Sonablate®-500: transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of prostate cancer , 2006, Expert review of medical devices.

[15]  C. Chaussy,et al.  Results and side effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound in localized prostate cancer. , 2001, Journal of endourology.

[16]  L. Curiel,et al.  Local recurrence of prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy: early experience of salvage therapy using high-intensity focused ultrasonography. , 2004, Urology.

[17]  C. Chaussy,et al.  High-intensive focused ultrasound in localized prostate cancer. , 2000, Journal of endourology.

[18]  L. Feldman,et al.  Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations , 2009, The Lancet.

[19]  Anthony D'Amico,et al.  Prostate cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. , 2007, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[20]  V. Laudone,et al.  Comprehensive standardized report of complications of retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2010, European urology.

[21]  X. Rébillard,et al.  High‐intensity focused ultrasound in prostate cancer; a systematic literature review of the French Association of Urology , 2008, BJU international.

[22]  J M Dubernard,et al.  Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound: minimally invasive therapy of localized prostate cancer. , 2000, Journal of endourology.

[23]  C. Chaussy,et al.  The status of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer and the impact of a combined resection , 2003, Current urology reports.

[24]  Laura Curiel,et al.  Control of prostate cancer by transrectal HIFU in 227 patients. , 2007, European urology.

[25]  K. Palmer,et al.  Early complication rates in a single-surgeon series of 2500 robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies: report applying a standardized grading system. , 2010, European urology.

[26]  J. J. de la Rosette,et al.  Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound devices: a critical appraisal of the available evidence. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[27]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[28]  V. Ficarra,et al.  Prospective evaluation with standardised criteria for postoperative complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2010, European urology.

[29]  J. Eastham,et al.  High‐intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: comparative definitions of biochemical failure , 2009, BJU international.

[30]  G. Guyatt,et al.  How Strong Is the Evidence? , 2008, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[31]  S. Horie,et al.  Focal therapy with high-intensity-focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. , 2008, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[32]  Toyoaki Uchida,et al.  Five years experience of transrectal high‐intensity focused ultrasound using the Sonablate device in the treatment of localized prostate cancer , 2006, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[33]  Hans Garmo,et al.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  A. Chapman,et al.  The clinical applications of high intensity focused ultrasound in the prostate , 2007, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[35]  Jane M Blazeby,et al.  Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation , 2009, The Lancet.

[36]  M Emberton,et al.  High-intensity-focused ultrasound in the treatment of primary prostate cancer: the first UK series , 2009, British Journal of Cancer.

[37]  David W. Taggart,et al.  No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations , 2009, The Lancet.

[38]  M. Colombel,et al.  Clinical Results of the Prostate HIFU Project , 2006 .