Optimal Sensor Position for a Computer Mouse

Computer mice have their displacement sensors in various locations (center, front, and rear). However, there has been little research into the effects of sensor position or on engineering approaches to exploit it. This paper first discusses the mechanisms via which sensor position affects mouse movement and reports the results from a study of a pointing task in which the sensor position was systematically varied. Placing the sensor in the center turned out to be the best compromise: improvements over front and rear were in the 11-14% range for throughput and 20--23% for path deviation. However, users varied in their personal optima. Accordingly, variable-sensor-position mice are then presented, with a demonstration that high accuracy can be achieved with two static optical sensors. A virtual sensor model is described that allows software-side repositioning of the sensor. Individual-specific calibration should yield an added 4% improvement in throughput over the default center position.

[1]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  AutoGain: Adapting Gain Functions by Optimizing Submovement Efficiency , 2016, ArXiv.

[2]  Daniel Vogel,et al.  Giving a hand to the eyes: leveraging input accuracy for subpixel interaction , 2012, UIST '12.

[3]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  How low can you go?: human limits in small unidirectional mouse movements , 2013, CHI.

[4]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  P. Fitts.  The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  L Finsen,et al.  Job demands, muscle activity and musculoskeletal symptoms in relation to work with the computer mouse. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[7]  Chih-Hsiu Cheng,et al.  The weight of computer mouse affects the wrist motion and forearm muscle activity during fast operation speed task , 2011, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[8]  Jack Tigh Dennerlein,et al.  Providing Training Enhances the Biomechanical Improvements of an Alternative Computer Mouse Design , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Peter W Johnson,et al.  Children computer mouse use and anthropometry. , 2012, Work.

[10]  E. Williams.  Experimental Designs Balanced for the Estimation of Residual Effects of Treatments , 1949 .

[11]  M Hagberg,et al.  Differences between work methods and gender in computer mouse use. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[12]  Byungjoo Lee,et al.  A Mouse With Two Optical Sensors That Eliminates Coordinate Disturbance During Skilled Strokes , 2015, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Bill Moggridge,et al.  Designing interactions , 2006 .

[14]  Mark Apperley,et al.  The orienting mouse: An input device with attitude , 2013 .

[15]  Han-Ming Chen,et al.  The effect on forearm and shoulder muscle activity in using different slanted computer mice. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  Jeremy R. Cooperstock,et al.  On the Limits of the Human Motor Control Precision: The Search for a Device's Human Resolution , 2011, INTERACT.

[17]  LeeByungjoo,et al.  A Mouse With Two Optical Sensors That Eliminates Coordinate Disturbance During Skilled Strokes , 2015 .

[18]  Mats Hagberg,et al.  Computer mouse use in two different hand positions: exposure, comfort, exertion and productivity. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  Jacob Cohen.  Measurement Educational and Psychological Educational and Psychological Measurement Eta-squared and Partial Eta-squared in Fixed Factor Anova Designs Educational and Psychological Measurement Additional Services and Information For , 2022 .

[20]  Poika Isokoski,et al.  Speed-accuracy measures in a population of six mice , 2002 .

[21]  I.,et al.  Fitts' Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  Daniel Vogel,et al.  The Impact of Control-Display Gain on User Performance in Pointing Tasks , 2008, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[23]  Susumu Harada,et al.  The angle mouse: target-agnostic dynamic gain adjustment based on angular deviation , 2009, CHI.

[24]  Alireza Choobineh,et al.  Designing a new computer mouse and evaluating some of its functional parameters. , 2014, Journal of research in health sciences.

[25]  Tek-Jin Nam,et al.  Inflatable mouse: volume-adjustable mouse with air-pressure-sensitive input and haptic feedback , 2008, CHI.

[26]  José Martin Miquel Cabeças.  The Friction Force Mouse-Pad and the Forearm Muscles Efforts , 2009 .

[27]  Alan Hedge,et al.  Ergonomic Comparison of Slanted and Vertical Computer Mouse Designs , 2010 .

[28]  P. Quemelo,et al.  Biomechanics and performance when using a standard and a vertical computer mouse , 2013, Ergonomics.

[29]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  Taking the Human Out of the Loop: A Review of Bayesian Optimization , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[30]  Pierre Cubaud,et al.  Supporting 3D window manipulation with a yawing mouse , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[31]  A Plooy,et al.  Wrist posture during computer pointing device use. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[32]  Nicolas Roussel,et al.  No more bricolage!: methods and tools to characterize, replicate and compare pointing transfer functions , 2011, UIST.

[33]  Sheng Kai Tang,et al.  Adaptive mouse: a deformable computer mouse achieving form-function synchronization , 2010, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[34]  Jacob O. Wobbrock,et al.  The effects of task dimensionality, endpoint deviation, throughput calculation, and experiment design on pointing measures and models , 2011, CHI.

[35]  Jacqui Hannagan.  TwistMouse for simultaneous translation and rotation , 2007 .

[36]  Björn Yttergren,et al.  The Design of a Computer Mouse Providing Three Degrees of Freedom , 2007, HCI.

[37]  Christopher Joseph Pal,et al.  A two-ball mouse affords three degrees of freedom , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[38]  Kentaro Kotani,et al.  Alternative Computer Mouse Design and Testing to Reduce Finger Extensor Muscle Activity During Mouse Use , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[39]  D. Rempel,et al.  Effects of computer mouse design and task on carpal tunnel pressure. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[40]  I. Scott MacKenzie.  User studies and usability evaluations: from research to products , 2015, Graphics Interface.

[41]  Yoshifumi Kitamura,et al.  Two-Part Models Capture the Impact of Gain on Pointing Performance , 2012, TCHI.

[42]  Alex Chaparro,et al.  Range of motion of the wrist: implications for designing computer input devices for the elderly , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.