Does liberalization of the railway industry lead to higher technical effectiveness?

Abstract The European Commission places increasing pressure on EU member states and forces national governments to liberate railway transportation and enable new operators to enter the rail industry. From an economic perspective, liberalization should lead to higher train performance and result in increased passenger flow. Most research papers examine the impact of rail reform by measuring the railway undertaking's performance and focus on efficiency of the intermediate railway outputs such as passenger/freight train kilometer. However, this paper aims to estimate railway performance from the view of demand and thus concentrates on the number of passengers and volume of goods transported, i.e., factors that indicate the ultimate success of the liberalization process. Therefore, in our analysis, we focused on technical effectiveness, which was estimated by a data envelopment analysis (DEA). In the next step, we studied what factors determine this effectiveness indicator, and we examined the significance of IBM's Liberalization Index in the adopted model.

[1]  José Manuel Pastor,et al.  Evaluating European railway deregulation using different approaches , 2012 .

[2]  Chris Nash,et al.  Benchmarking of train operating firms – a transaction cost efficiency analysis , 2010 .

[3]  Christian Growitsch,et al.  Testing for Economies of Scope in European Railways: An Efficiency Analysis , 2006 .

[4]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[5]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[6]  Pedro Cantos,et al.  REGULATION AND EFFICIENCY: THE CASE OF EUROPEAN RAILWAYS , 2001 .

[7]  Marc Ivaldi,et al.  Railway (De)Regulation: A European Efficiency Comparison , 2004 .

[8]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[9]  Christine Laabsch,et al.  The impact of vertical separation on the success of the railways , 2012 .

[10]  Ali Kabasakal,et al.  Determination of the efficiency of the world railway companies by method of DEA and comparison of their efficiency by Tobit analysis , 2013 .

[11]  Lawrence W. Lan,et al.  Performance Measurement for Railway Transport: Stochastic Distance Functions with Inefficiency and Ineffectiveness Effects , 2006 .

[12]  Martin Kvizda,et al.  Role of railways in empowering travelers: A case study from the Czech Republic , 2015, J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manag..

[13]  Fabio Sciancalepore,et al.  Using a DEA-cross efficiency approach in public procurement tenders , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[15]  Sergio Perelman,et al.  Technical efficiency of European railways: a distance function approach , 2000 .

[16]  F. Zeuthen Economic Theory and Method , 2014 .

[17]  Martin Kvizda,et al.  Modely a metody regulace konkurenčního prostředí na trhu železničních dopravních služeb. , 2013 .

[18]  Pedro Cantos-Sánchez,et al.  Vertical and Horizontal Separation in the European Railway Sector and its Effects on Productivity , 2010 .

[19]  V. Pham,et al.  The Liberalization of Rail Transport in the European Union , 2013 .

[20]  Ming-Miin Yu,et al.  Assessing the technical efficiency, service effectiveness, and technical effectiveness of the world's railways through NDEA analysis , 2008 .

[21]  J. M. Pastor,et al.  Productivity, efficiency and technical change in the European railways: A non-parametric approach , 1999 .

[22]  Jakub Taczanowski,et al.  The Effects of Liberalisation of the Passenger Railway Market on the Situation of Regional Rail Connections in Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Austria , 2015 .

[23]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .