Implementation of the LPS using an excel spreadsheet: A case study from the New Zealand construction industry

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the implementation challenges of one of lean construction’s recent tools, the last planner system (LPS), by exploring issues in the New Zealand construction sector to identify potential areas for improvement. To achieve this aim, the study formulated two objectives: to present the challenges in LPS use and to explore solutions by using an Excel spreadsheet for facilitating LPS applications. Design/methodology/approach The study drew primarily upon a case study approach. A fieldwork study and document analysis of a New Zealand construction project were conducted with an extensive literature review undertaken on the LPS concept. Findings The findings revealed that although an automated spreadsheet could be a simple and inexpensive option for using the LPS, data collection, storage and transfer into the spreadsheet could significantly influence the reliability of the LPS outcomes. Most data utilisation challenges were found to occur around the three data sets included in the weekly work plan (WWP). The study presented several automation solutions which had been applied to overcome data utilisation challenges. Originality/value Among the first of its kind in the construction industry, this study, with its first-hand account of an organisation which uses the lean paradigm, provides an in-depth insight into LPS tool implementation. The study extends the current body of knowledge by unearthing the challenges of LPS integration into construction activities and presenting efforts undertaken in a construction case project to overcome relevant issues. This adds value by enhancing the reliability of the LPS and, consequently, the effectiveness of its implementation in practical terms.

[1]  Thomas Froese,et al.  The impact of emerging information technology on project management for construction , 2010 .

[2]  Sui Pheng Low,et al.  The Last Planner System in China's construction industry — A SWOT analysis on implementation , 2014 .

[3]  Farook Hamzeh,et al.  Improving Construction Workflow- The Role of Production Planning and Control , 2009 .

[4]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Improving construction management practice with the Last Planner System: a case study , 2014 .

[5]  Scott Fernie,et al.  Making sense of supply chain management: a comparative study of aerospace and construction , 2005 .

[6]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Factory physics : foundations of manufacturing management , 1996 .

[7]  Kiyoung Son,et al.  Survey of Motivations, Benefits, and Implementation Challenges of Last Planner System Users , 2013 .

[8]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[9]  Abdulsalam A. Al-Sudairi Evaluating the effect of construction process characteristics to the applicability of lean principles , 2007 .

[10]  Herman Glenn Ballard,et al.  THE LAST PLANNER SYSTEM OF PRODUCTION CONTROL , 2000 .

[11]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[12]  Glenn A. Bowen Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method , 2009 .

[13]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  SHIELDING PRODUCTION: ESSENTIAL STEP IN PRODUCTION CONTROL , 1998 .

[14]  Glenn Ballard,et al.  The Lean Project Delivery System: An Update , 2008 .

[15]  Sven Bertelsen,et al.  BRIDGING THE GAPS - TOWARDS A COMPREHENSIVE UNDERSTANDING OF LEAN CONSTRUCTION , 2002 .

[16]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Competing Construction Management Paradigms , 2003, Lean Construction Journal.

[17]  Glenn Ballard,et al.  LOOKAHEAD PLANNING: THE MISSING LINK IN PRODUCTION CONTROL , 1997 .

[18]  Chris Donghyun Kim An Analysis Of The Last Planner® System In A Construction Project , 2014 .

[19]  Piet Verschuren,et al.  Case study as a research strategy: Some ambiguities and opportunities , 2003 .

[20]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[21]  Luis F. Alarcón,et al.  Assessing the Impacts of Implementing Lean Construction , 2008 .

[22]  Christine Pasquire,et al.  Exploring the implementation of the Last Planner® System through IGLC community: twenty one years of experience , 2015 .

[23]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  The four roles of supply chain management in construction , 2000 .

[24]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[25]  Greg Howell,et al.  Implementing Lean Construction: Stabilizing Work Flow , 1997 .

[26]  Stephen Emmitt,et al.  Investigating the integration of design and construction from a “lean” perspective , 2009 .

[27]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Workplan: Database for Work Package Production Scheduling , 1998 .

[28]  Nicholas Chileshe,et al.  Adopting global virtual engineering teams in AEC projects : a qualitative meta-analysis of innovation diffusion studies , 2015 .

[29]  Michael Hammer,et al.  Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate , 1990 .

[30]  Glenn Ballard,et al.  Improving Labor Productivity Through Production Control , 2008 .

[31]  Rafael Sacks,et al.  Impacts of the Social Subcontract and Last Planner System Interventions on the Trade-Crew Workflows of Multistory Residential Construction Projects , 2016 .

[32]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  Improving Construction Work Flow – The Connective Role of Lookahead Planning , 2008 .