Finite element prediction of endosteal and periosteal bone remodelling in the turkey ulna: Effect of remodelling signal and dead-zone definition

Abstract Bone remodelling is the adaptation of bone mass in response to localized changes in loading conditions. The nature of the mechanical signal governing remodelling, however, remains the subject of continued investigation. The aims of this study were to use an iterative finite element (FE) bone remodelling technique to explore the effect of different remodelling signals in the prediction of bone remodelling behaviour. A finite element model of the turkey ulna, following that of Brown et al., was analysed using the ABAQUS package. The model was validated against the static predictions of the Brown et al. study. A bone remodelling technique, based on swelling algorithms given by Taylor and Clift, was then applied to predict the dramatic change in loading conditions imposed. The resulting changes in FE mid-shaft bone geometry were compared with the remodelling observed experimentally and showed good agreement. The tensile principal stress was found to be the best remodelling signal under the imposed conditions. Localized sensitivities in the remodelling patterns were found, however, and the definition of the dead zone was modified as a result. Remodelling with the new dead-zone definition showed that both the tensile principal stress and the tensile principal strain produced the remodelling patterns that agreed most closely with experiment.

[1]  J J Hamilton,et al.  Bone remodeling and structural optimization. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  C. Gentz,et al.  Mechanical loosening of the femoral head prosthesis in the Charnley total hip arthroplasty. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  R. Brand,et al.  Toward an identification of mechanical parameters initiating periosteal remodeling: a combined experimental and analytic approach. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Hwj Rik Huiskes Bone remodeling around implants can be explained as an effect of mechanical adaptation , 1995 .

[5]  D. Carter The relationship between in vivo strains and cortical bone remodeling. , 1982, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[6]  A. Amis,et al.  Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis Research Society. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  Carter Dr The relationship between in vivo strains and cortical bone remodeling. , 1982 .

[9]  S. Cowin,et al.  Candidates for the mechanosensory system in bone. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  R. Brand,et al.  Testing the daily stress stimulus theory of bone adaptation with natural and experimentally controlled strain histories. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Computer predictions of bone remodeling around porous-coated implants. , 1990, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  C T Rubin,et al.  Functional strains and cortical bone adaptation: epigenetic assurance of skeletal integrity. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  D R Sumner,et al.  Adaptive bone remodeling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: A comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  H. Frost Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal , 1987, The Anatomical record.

[15]  P. Smolinski,et al.  Bone remodeling around total hip implants. , 1992, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[16]  A. Terrier,et al.  Adaptation Models of Anisotropic Bone. , 1997, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[17]  N. Rushton,et al.  Bone remodelling in the proximal femur after Charnley total hip arthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  L. Lanyon,et al.  The influence of strain rate on adaptive bone remodelling. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  J. Galante,et al.  ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  S C Cowin,et al.  Implementation of strain rate as a bone remodeling stimulus. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  B. Reddy,et al.  A three-dimensional finite analysis of adaptive remodelling in the proximal femur. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  H B Skinner,et al.  Correlation of Computed Finite Element Stresses to Bone Density After Remodeling Around Cementless Femoral Implants , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  S C Cowin,et al.  Bone stress adaptation models. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.