Tall Amazonian forests are less sensitive to precipitation variability

Climate change is altering the dynamics, structure and function of the Amazon, a biome deeply connected to the Earth’s carbon cycle. Climate factors that control the spatial and temporal variations in forest photosynthesis have been well studied, but the influence of forest height and age on this controlling effect has rarely been considered. Here, we present remote sensing observations of solar-induced fluorescence (a proxy for photosynthesis), precipitation, vapour-pressure deficit and canopy height, together with estimates of forest age and aboveground biomass. We show that photosynthesis in tall Amazonian forests, that is, forests above 30 m, is three times less sensitive to precipitation variability than in shorter (less than 20 m) forests. Taller Amazonian forests are also found to be older, have more biomass and deeper rooting systems1, which enable them to access deeper soil moisture and make them more resilient to drought. We suggest that forest height and age are an important control of photosynthesis in response to interannual precipitation fluctuations. Although older and taller trees show less sensitivity to precipitation variations, they are more susceptible to fluctuations in vapour-pressure deficit. Our findings illuminate the response of Amazonian forests to water stress, droughts and climate change.Tall trees are less sensitive to variation in precipitation than short trees, according to analyses of photosynthetic sensitivity to drought in tall and short Amazon forests. The results demonstrate higher resilience of tall trees to drought.

[1]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.

[2]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Root distribution in an Amazonian seasonal forest as derived from δ13C profiles , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[3]  Damien Sulla-Menashe,et al.  MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets , 2010 .

[4]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  New global observations of the terrestrial carbon cycle from GOSAT: Patterns of plant fluorescence with gross primary productivity , 2011, Geophysical Research Letters.

[5]  S. Goetz,et al.  Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps , 2012 .

[6]  R. H. Brooks,et al.  Hydraulic properties of porous media , 1963 .

[7]  Susan G. Letcher,et al.  Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics , 2016, Science Advances.

[8]  Dara Entekhabi,et al.  Regionally strong feedbacks between the atmosphere and terrestrial biosphere. , 2017, Nature geoscience.

[9]  Scott J Goetz,et al.  Seasonal and interannual variability of climate and vegetation indices across the Amazon , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  R. H. Brooks,et al.  Drainage Characteristics of Soils1 , 1975 .

[11]  A. Huete,et al.  Amazon Forests Green-Up During 2005 Drought , 2007, Science.

[12]  J. Susskind,et al.  Global Precipitation at One-Degree Daily Resolution from Multisatellite Observations , 2001 .

[13]  Y. Malhi,et al.  Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon starvation , 2015, Nature.

[14]  A. Baccini,et al.  Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar , 2011 .

[15]  O. Phillips,et al.  Drought impact on forest carbon dynamics and fluxes in Amazonia , 2015, Nature.

[16]  Alfredo R. Huete,et al.  Leaf development and demography explain photosynthetic seasonality in Amazon evergreen forests , 2016, Science.

[17]  Pierre Gentine,et al.  Global variations in ecosystem‐scale isohydricity , 2017, Global change biology.

[18]  David J. Harding,et al.  Amazon forests maintain consistent canopy structure and greenness during the dry season , 2014, Nature.

[19]  Piet Stammes,et al.  Effective cloud fractions from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: Theoretical framework and validation , 2008 .

[20]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: mechanisms and challenges. , 2014, Journal of experimental botany.

[21]  S. Ganguly,et al.  Amazon forests did not green‐up during the 2005 drought , 2009 .

[22]  Jordi Martínez-Vilalta,et al.  Water potential regulation, stomatal behaviour and hydraulic transport under drought: deconstructing the iso/anisohydric concept. , 2017, Plant, cell & environment.

[23]  Daniel M. Johnson,et al.  Does homeostasis or disturbance of homeostasis in minimum leaf water potential explain the isohydric versus anisohydric behavior of Vitis vinifera L. cultivars? , 2012, Tree physiology.

[24]  Arief Wijaya,et al.  An integrated pan‐tropical biomass map using multiple reference datasets , 2016, Global change biology.

[25]  B. Barkstrom,et al.  Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES): An Earth Observing System Experiment , 1996 .

[26]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Amazon forest response to repeated droughts , 2016 .

[27]  D. A. King,et al.  Height-diameter allometry of tropical forest trees , 2010 .

[28]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Global monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from moderate-spectral-resolution near-infrared satellite measurements: methodology, simulations, and application to GOME-2 , 2013 .

[29]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Satellite observation of tropical forest seasonality: spatial patterns of carbon exchange in Amazonia , 2015 .

[30]  N. Holbrook,et al.  Relations between stomatal closure, leaf turgor and xylem vulnerability in eight tropical dry forest trees , 2003 .

[31]  E. Middleton,et al.  Filling-in of near-infrared solar lines by terrestrial fluorescence and other geophysical effects: simulations and space-based observations from SCIAMACHY and GOSAT , 2012 .

[32]  Hartmut H. Aumann,et al.  Atmospheric Infrared Sounder on the Earth Observing System , 1994 .

[33]  Paolo De Angelis,et al.  Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance , 2011 .

[34]  David Medvigy,et al.  Diversity in plant hydraulic traits explains seasonal and inter-annual variations of vegetation dynamics in seasonally dry tropical forests. , 2016, The New phytologist.

[35]  Kelly K. Caylor,et al.  Photosynthetic seasonality of global tropical forests constrained by hydroclimate , 2015 .

[36]  Urs Wegmüller,et al.  Forest growing stock volume of the northern hemisphere: Spatially explicit estimates for 2010 derived from Envisat ASAR , 2015 .

[37]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Forest productivity and water stress in Amazonia: observations from GOSAT chlorophyll fluorescence , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  J. Espinoza,et al.  Climate variability and extreme drought in the upper Solimões River (western Amazon Basin): Understanding the exceptional 2010 drought , 2011 .

[39]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[40]  Sylvain Delzon,et al.  Weak tradeoff between xylem safety and xylem-specific hydraulic efficiency across the world's woody plant species. , 2016, The New phytologist.

[41]  Pierre Gentine,et al.  Sensitivity of grassland productivity to aridity controlled by stomatal and xylem regulation , 2017 .

[42]  L. Guanter,et al.  Consistency Between Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Gross Primary Production of Vegetation in North America , 2016 .

[43]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Drought Sensitivity of the Amazon Rainforest , 2009, Science.

[44]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Role of tree size in moist tropical forest carbon cycling and water deficit responses. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[45]  O. Phillips,et al.  The 2010 Amazon Drought , 2011, Science.

[46]  Luana S. Basso,et al.  Drought sensitivity of Amazonian carbon balance revealed by atmospheric measurements , 2014, Nature.

[47]  J. Hovenier,et al.  A fast method for retrieval of cloud parameters using oxygen A band measurements from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment , 2001 .

[48]  R. Seager,et al.  Temperature as a potent driver of regional forest drought stress and tree mortality , 2013 .

[49]  Nicholas C. Parazoo,et al.  Interpreting seasonal changes in the carbon balance of southern Amazonia using measurements of XCO2 and chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT , 2013 .

[50]  P. Blanken,et al.  The increasing importance of atmospheric demand for ecosystem water and carbon fluxes , 2016 .

[51]  T. Oki,et al.  Disruption of hydroecological equilibrium in southwest Amazon mediated by drought , 2015 .

[52]  Rafael Poyatos,et al.  A new look at water transport regulation in plants. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[53]  R. Betts,et al.  The role of ecosystem-atmosphere interactions in simulated Amazonian precipitation decrease and forest dieback under global climate warming , 2004 .

[54]  L. Aragão,et al.  Exploring the likelihood and mechanism of a climate-change-induced dieback of the Amazon rainforest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  L. Guanter,et al.  The seasonal cycle of satellite chlorophyll fluorescence observations and its relationship to vegetation phenology and ecosystem atmosphere carbon exchange , 2014 .

[56]  A. Sobel,et al.  Fog and rain in the Amazon , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  José A. Sobrino,et al.  Record-breaking warming and extreme drought in the Amazon rainforest during the course of El Niño 2015–2016 , 2016, Scientific Reports.